Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary discussed a "graceful exit" with Dem bigwigs this weekend?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Cheney Killed Bambi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 03:22 PM
Original message
Hillary discussed a "graceful exit" with Dem bigwigs this weekend?
Edited on Sun Mar-23-08 03:32 PM by Cheney Killed Bambi
I am hearing that Hillary, Bill, and her inner circle are finishing up marathon meetings conducted over this weekend with Democratic bigwigs and other beltway honchos where her exit from the race was topic #1. She and Bill have been discussing how their people would have some kind of role in an Obama administration.

I know I am just an anonymous person on a blog, and I can't give anyone a link, so take this with a grain of salt. But this is what I have been told. Also note that the blogger Booman suggests that something like this is afoot:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/3/22/225857/300/610/482459

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. Make it so Number 1
PUH-LEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASE!!!

But I think Clinton will drop after PA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Madam Mossfern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. My magic 8 ball says no.
I think she's going to stay in much longer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 01:43 AM
Response to Reply #4
140. She's waiting for Puerto Rico to put her over the top
But then Obama is rumored to be currently vacationing in the Caribbean. Could he be one step ahead of her, lobbying for votes in that ever important moving goalpost territory?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #140
221. Guam!
We Guamanians count too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trained specialist Donating Member (40 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #221
259. Daily Kos is nothing but Obama SPAM
There is not one credible person left in that blog.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #259
263. So that's why the Clinton supporters put in such effort to try and take it over?
Yes, clearly it's worthless. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #259
269. and this relates to Guam HOW?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #221
266. Bat Guam-o.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 04:40 AM
Response to Reply #4
149. She's proved she craves humiliation
with her marriage to Bill. She still wants more?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Red Zelda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #149
184. Whoa ... that's a really good point
nice one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
21. ill always think of her as number 2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #21
28. you rascal
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ekwhite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #21
44. Keep it clean, please. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #44
91. thanks for your input
ill consider it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #21
85. Yeah, hilary's number 2 alright...
And in those meetings they should be considering how to get a patina over that stench.

Nothing in the Obama adminisrtation for them..they blew it big time..that would be like having known spies working for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BearSquirrel2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #85
214. VP is out of the question ...

The VP slot is out of the question. If Bill wants to come on board as secretary of state ... I'm all for it. I could see Hillary holding a cabinet post, especially if it will get her to quit. Secretary of Education or Health and Human Services might be a good fit.

Though, I suspect that she would just want to remain a Senator. Defense, State and Attorney General are typically the only cabinet positions worth quitting a Senate seat over. I don't think any of these would be a fit for her.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #21
114. I Will Always Think Of You As Number 3
"Mommy, I made number 3"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #21
199. Number 2 - like Mr. Spock? ... Oh, never mind.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sudopod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
128. The LINE must be drawn HERE!
</ Picard >
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. Why would she leave now when her chances of winning are stronger than they have been since 2/5?
This is meritless speculation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. LOL
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. she can't win. That's why she should leave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. 2/5, the date she said it would be over? That didn't work well. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. Bless your heart, jackson dem --
Hillary is lucky to have you in her corner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #16
103. Nevermind
Edited on Sun Mar-23-08 06:47 PM by stevenleser
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #103
115. I can only guess...
but I meant it sincerely. It must be tough on DU these days to be a Hillary supporter. I'd be the same way if Biden was still in the running.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ekwhite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
49. Her chances may indeed be stronger than since 2/5
Edited on Sun Mar-23-08 03:59 PM by ekwhite
But that doesn't mean her chances are good. I would not expect her to drop out before the Pennsylvania primaries, but she will be forced to drop out by her finances soon after that.

Edit: I agree that she is lucky to have you in her corner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 04:42 AM
Response to Reply #49
150. She doesn't even have money for ads in PA.
I wonder how much she blew on the pitiful phone call ad.

She is so out of balance and out of touch with humanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 07:19 AM
Response to Reply #150
168. she doesn't need money for ads
when she has the local press in PA give her free media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BumRushDaShow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #168
170. Ain't that the truth? Free ads from the local media, Fast Eddie the governator, Mixmaster Mike.
She's never had to spend a dime except on Mark Penn and luxury hotels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BearSquirrel2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #49
215. She lost delegates ...
Geesh, all her gains from Ohio have been wiped out. She has not chance.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FatDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
112. Well, I can think of three reasons
1. There will be no Florida revote
2. There will be no Michigan revote
3. Bill Richardson has endorsed Obama

Getting FL and MI revotes was really her last hope. Richardson defecting was a kick while she was down. It is now unwinnable for Hilary and everyone (except for her most ardent supporters) know it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BearSquirrel2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #112
216. Michigan revote would have hurt ...

I think Hillary would have gained in Florida. I don't think Michigan would have helped her much if she could could only beat "Undecided" by 15 points.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevietheman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 05:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
159. Wow. ROFLMAO! n/t
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #2
201. You can still call it "winning?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky 13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
212. Her chances are stronger than they've been since 2/5... so they are only NEXT to impossible now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ksquire Donating Member (110 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
230. Where do you get your drugs? i need some to deal with FOX news nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
239. TRANSLATION: I FAILED MATH
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
254. "EVACUATE? In her Moment of Triumph!?"
Edited on Mon Mar-24-08 03:29 PM by Leopolds Ghost
"I think you underestimate our chances!"



"Mr. Penn, we've evaluated Sen. Obama's attack plan, and there IS a danger.
Shall I have your shuttle waiting for you?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #254
276. Ooo, good one. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. who told you?
Hillary's schedule for tomorrow shows her and Bill doing a lot of campaigning, so I don't think she's going to drop out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Hillary's schedule for tomorrow shows her and Bill doing a lot of campaigning
Remember Edwards had campaign stops planned for the day after he dropped out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I don't remember that at all
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. I do --
Had to do some canceling and re-shuffling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheney Killed Bambi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. Tomorrow is not the weekend
I will edit to make it clear, she's already HAD those meetings, for the most part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #14
24. if so, it would explain the long weekend she had in NY
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. Obama torn down? McCain winning? Her work here is done
Personally, I hope she goes to hell and stays there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ekwhite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
53. It is time to put the Hillary hate to bed.
If she drops out, I will praise her for a hard-fought campaign. Her and Bill could serve very well as surrogate campaigners for Obama. We are all Democrats - if she drops out, it will be time to let bygones be bygones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #53
63. It's not hatred -- it's anger. I don't put anger to "bed" -- that leads to depression
This isn't about Obama -- this is about what she did to the party -- my party. Goddamned right, I'm mad.

I don't care if Obama turned into Satan tomorrow, I'd still be mad at her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #63
86. Thanks, Melody...you have every
right to feel that(as if you needed me to tell you).. Nobody better ever tell me from up on their pedestal to put my "hilary hate" to bed! Try and tell that to the families and friends of the victims of the War On Iraq that she voted for and pandered to when the bushits were ridin' high.

And, then when it wasn't so popular anymore..another one of her many personalities came out to cover up and lie some more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #86
89. Precisely n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hutzpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #63
241. Thank you Thank you,
thats my beef with her, its not about Obama, its about what
she has done to the party, my anger comes from the damages
she has created.

She has given those thugs a lot of ammunition to tore us
apart, just take a look at Joe Scarborough and Pat
Buchanan listen to their talking point, its about the race
bait and division that her camp has thrown out there, thats
what those two have made their talking point.

This morning it was Chris Matthews that stepped in to stop
Mika and Pat from talking about Obama and the Pastor. They
spent two hours just on that topic alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blayne Donating Member (341 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #63
245. The hateful discourse here makes me depressed.
I think what ekwhite was saying is that we are trying to clean it up around here. Maybe the end is near, and we are going to have to come together as a party when it does get here. We don't mind if you hate someone and want then to go to hell, but don't ruin a great thread with hateful rhetoric.

I was so happy reading the peaceful back and forth in this thread. The talk about real options and "what ifs." Maybe we have turned a corner here, and I know yall love hearing that from someone who has only been here a year. Keep up the good work :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #245
257. It's not hateful rhetoric ... it's legitimate anger
This is what happens when dysfunctional families explode --

The bully bullies and the enablers try to explain the bullies actions and then when the bullied people
finally getting angry and fight back, the enablers blame the victims for rising up ... making a scene ...
trying to not "make peace" and "play nice".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blayne Donating Member (341 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #257
262. I don't think your rational fits the context of this forum.
We can have a fun and constructive debate about the candidates and other issues, but hate breeds hate. We come here with the expectation that this forum isn't full of bullies and victims. We are supposed to be Democrats who can exchange ideas rationally. I know Hillary threw the kitchen sink, but that doesn't mean we have to throw it at each other. Playing nice isn't such a bad thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #262
265. I don't see expressing anger at a candidate as an attack on each other
Anger is perfectly rational if expressed that way.

In fact, a suppression of anger can be far less rational.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 04:46 AM
Response to Reply #53
152. Not from where I'm sitting.
No. Not ever. I hope she disappears forever. It has been a horrible mugging, and the only thing she deserves is to suffer the consequences. I will be MAD at Obama if he lets that bitch any where near our new administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riskpeace Donating Member (382 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #152
173. I regret the personalization by both sides.
In just this thread, you've called Senator Clinton a bitch and made fun of her marriage. You've also speculated that she likes to be humiliated. That is very dangerous and demeaning rhetoric in my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pollo poco Donating Member (286 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #173
207. agreed riskpeace
People who hate Hillary (for good reason, I might add) should not allow this kind of language to pollute our process. It doesn't just put Hillary down. It is hate speech against women. It harms all women.

People who use this kind of woman hating language are no different from the people on the right who will attack Obama for being black. But, since we here say it's OK to use hate speech, I hope it's not a problem for us in the GE.

"Woman is the nigger of the world."-John Lennon

Too bad we prove him right every day on DU. In fact- if John Lennon was a poster on DU, he might get reported or ignored for using that word. He should have used bitch. That's OK here.

Stick to the issues. Your ill disguised gender based hatred is offensive, and should not be a part of any election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riskpeace Donating Member (382 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #207
219. Thanks for your reply.
I do not agree with Senator Clinton, or Senator Obama, about everything. I have my preferred candidate, but I'd vote for either one in November and respect both of their public service.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Daemonaquila Donating Member (413 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #173
250. Agreed
She is so wrong for this country for so many reasons, but her family life is beside the point. There are so many of her actual actions to make the point with - why stoop to the level of silly personal taunts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DWilliamsamh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #152
256. Ok I am as angry as hell about what her tactics have done to Obama
and hence the prospect of a Democratic victory in the fall... but I seriously think you are going over the top here. It always worries me when folks on my side of the aisle start sounding like hard core bible belt conservatives when they are speaking of someone in our party. Don't get me wrong she has gone a LOoooooooong way to losing any shred of respect I once had for her but i just don't think we should literally be joining rabid republicans in espousing actual personal hatred of her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #53
205. Yes, and many were taken-in by her conciliatory close at the Texas debate ...
... immediately after which she rolled-out the "kitchen sink" attack strategy. She needs to be fought until she formally concedes the race.

And I think "hate" never had a place, but distrust, resistance and anger certainly are understandable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BearSquirrel2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #53
217. No thank you ...

If he helps Obama the way he helped Hillary, no thank you.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Not the Only One Donating Member (617 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
10. sounds like a reasonable solution
Hillary has leverage and there is a ton of value to Obama for her to end this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
12. I support this message!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
13. If the Clintons manage to go positive, I'd be so relieved.
And it's not really a matter of her dropping our or staying in but more, the impact on our party.

Or, YOUR party because my reg hasn't been switched back yet. In any case, a positive solution would be so great.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InAbLuEsTaTe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 07:11 AM
Response to Reply #13
164. Isn't that supposedly one one of the seven signs of the Apocolyse?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
15. This could be fantastic news... it's not a zero-sum game
It doesn't have taken to an unfortunate Obama wins / Hillary loses ending.
Together we are much stronger than divided.. and that means all of us here at DU.
This could be the news that will help us unite and kick McCain's ass,
take back Congress (overwhelmingly) and restore the Supreme Court.

This could be the best thing for ALL of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #15
25. hopefully so
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BklynChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
17. from your lips to god's ears.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Citizen Kang Donating Member (424 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
19. May 6
Thats the night she calls it quits.

Let her have Penn. Obama puts it away in NC and Indy. Please exit gracefully stage right. Maybe have Senate Majority Leader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #19
29. Why would you think she would WANT Majority Leader? It's a SHITTY job.
You spend all your time herding cats and carping. It's the most thankless job in the Senate.

It hasn't been a "good gig" since LBJ had it--he was the last guy who really knew how to lean on people and bend them to his will via that job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. LBJ was Senate majority leader?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #33
68. Yes, he was. They called him the MASTER OF THE SENATE. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #68
192. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #33
193. I recommend
Robert Caro's Pulitzer winning biography of Johnson, if only the Master of the Senate Volume.
( there are 3 volumes and Caro is working on a 4th, everyone is hoping he finishes before he passes away)
First volume talks about how Johnson stole election for Senate..the infamous Box 13.
Great political education in those books.
Having a grasp of political history really does help in understanding current politics...ahem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ekwhite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #29
54. You don't think Hillary Clinton would be a good majority leader?
She would be a great one. The best Senate Majority Leader since LBJ himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #54
67. She'd be WASTED in that role. The system doesn't work the way it used to.
Read Caro.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 04:46 AM
Response to Reply #54
151. No. I don't think she has shown the judgment or temperment to be a good leader period. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 04:50 AM
Response to Reply #151
154. She should volunteer for a space flight. A LONG one.
I don't even like her on my planet. There is NOTHING redeeming about her. She is a ZERO, by her own hand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #151
189. I agree, she's shown her true colors during this campaign
Senate Majority Leader?? I think not. In fact I am 100% done with ANY Dem who appears on the list of DLC members. Vote them all out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #29
120. All I know is, Harry Reid has got to fucking GO.
I'd be happy to see HRC in that job if she was interested in it.

Other ideas? How about Secretary of State?

I also think the Supreme Court is not a bad idea, at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #120
124. I kinda like her in the POTUS slot, myself. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #124
131. That is highly unlikely at this juncture.
Personally, if you had said the words "Hillary Clinton for President 2008" to me in 1992, or even in 1999, I would have been all for it. She started to lose me once she got in the Senate and began neo-con pandering. Her vote for the IWR, her subsequent refusal to admit it was a mistake... BIG problems with this Democrat.

Ancillary crap like video games and banning flag burning were certainly annoyances, too.

However, the way she has run her campaign in these primaries- beginning with her reliance on assertions of inevitability instead of doing the work on the ground and making the sale to the voters; moving rapidly downhill to the cheap, snide, sleazy and downright weak shit she has pulled in recent months... all I can say is, as someone who used to like HRC quite a bit--- in the unlikely event that she is our nominee I will vote for her, but I won't be enthusiastic about it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #131
133. We'll see.
You apparently don't understand that the "flag burning crap" was very targeted (it only dealt with federal property, where setting fires and demonstrating are prohibited ANYWAY) and was designed to STOP a GOP-dominated Congress from introducing a Constitutional amendment against the practice.

What she cleverly did was make up a law that already applied, to shut up the GOP. Only those who didn't pay attention to her clever trick would think that she was doing any abrogating of rights. The GOP knew it, too, but it made them look like jerks to press on when there was so much other business at hand--and how could they vote AGAINST it? People make fun of triangulation, but that was a brilliant instance where she stopped the GOP from fucking with the Constitution....and if you do it once, it's easier to do it the next time.

People who don't like her, don't like her. Nothing to be done about that, I suppose. She's pretty frigging smart. IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #133
136. I agree that she's smart.
Edited on Mon Mar-24-08 01:26 AM by impeachdubya
But frankly, I'm tired of triangulation, I'm tired of political calculations based on this particularly tired brand of "conventional wisdom" about the American People which is, more often than not, wrong.

What I think Bill Clinton would have done, at least back in the day, is come out and explained, with wit and eloquence, WHY protecting the right to unpopular speech -like flag burning- is MORE patriotic than passing laws that even give the impression of fucking with the First Amendment. THAT would have been the way to protect the Constitution. THAT would have real leadership.

That's the sort of thing Barack Obama does, in case you haven't noticed.

Instead, from Hillary we get political games. But on this, even with the implied First Amendment issues- I would agree that it wasn't such a big deal. Triangulation on the Iraq War, bowing to "conventional wisdom" which said she needed to play the hawk... that's way tougher to stomach.

As far as "people who don't like her, don't like her". Funny, I seem to remember standing in a huge crowd in front of the State of Illinois Bldg in October of 1992 when she was on stage with Bill and Al and Tipper, I liked her then. I even still liked her in April 2004 when I was in DC for the March for Womens' Lives, and she spoke onstage, even though I was deeply disappointed that she, unlike many brave Senators including one of my own, had voted for the IWR...

I don't "hate" her, but I do think she's run a particularly objectionable campaign. If it was just about me "not liking" her, I wouldn't have liked her 16 years ago, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 01:46 AM
Response to Reply #136
141. You didn't read what I wrote.
It was a GOP congress. They wanted to CHANGE THE CONSTITUTION.

She prevented that, by writing a law that CHANGED NOTHING. It protected speech. It protected demonstrators. Changing the constitution, like the GOP wanted to do, would have criminalized their actions.

You can't demonstrate on Federal property, and you can't light fires there either. You NEVER COULD. Either situation, and you're arrested. She wrote a law outlawing something that you cannot do ANYWAY.

And you sit there and tell me what Barack Obama would have done? Barack Obama wouldn't have been able to get his bill out of committee in a GOP-majority Senate, never mind get it passed. He didn't have the connections--he still would have been looking to his assigned mentor Joe Lieberman for guidance on where the best restrooms are in the Senate, best time to visit the POAC, and the times when the dining room is least crowded.

Clinton took the time to really get to know Robert Byrd, and he was very helpful to her as well as others in dealing with those bastards on the right side of the aisle. She also had more familiarity with the Hill, having been there years back and through osmosis when she lived at the other end of the street. She knew how to move legislation, and she gamed those bums six ways to Sunday.

It's only here on DU that I hear this bullshit theme about how TERRIBLE it is that she put forth a "Potemkin" flag burning law. She was the one that did it, because she was the one from 911 New York State who COULD do it, and because she, like anyone with a brain, didn't want a flag burning AMENDMENT to our Constitution.

And that's what we might have gotten had she not jumped in with a practical "faux solution."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 02:37 AM
Response to Reply #141
145. Operative words being "might have gotten". Surely you know the process for amending the Constituion.
Edited on Mon Mar-24-08 02:38 AM by impeachdubya
It takes more than a vote in Congress. If idiotic Amendments are so easy to come by, how come the GOP congress never got that HLA thing off the ground- you know, the one they advocate every 4 years in the platform, the one which would outlaw the Birth Control Pill?

Oh, yeah- because they're terrified that by pushing it too hard, people -even allegedly "pro life" ones- might actually THINK about it, because most Americans do actually know that Amending the Constitution isn't something that is supposed to be done lightly. And real debate would illuminate the fact that the American People are overwhelmingly pro-choice. The American People CERTAINLY don't want oral contraceptives outlawed, as much as the GOP base may.

Same with flag burning- so the GOP congress might have sent the stupid thing out to the states? Fine. Let's have that debate.

One problem with the Hillary Conventional Wisdom crowd, they don't give the American People any intellectual credit. So they pander to where they think the voters are, and wonder why they aren't trusted.

Perhaps Hillary was bravely protecting the right to free speech with her law. Perhaps.

I understand why you'd rather talk about that than her IWR vote, certainly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 03:57 AM
Response to Reply #145
146. And that would have been a FINE distraction during an election year, wouldn't it have?
It's not bad enough that the candidates were, and are, talking about stupid nonsensical faux issues, we'd have to have dealt with that flag burning crap through the last Senate contests AND this election had Clinton not neutralized the discussion. How unhelpful would that have been?

Birth control and flag burning aren't on the same plane. The GOP actually like birth control, because they don't want their mistresses to get pregnant.

Flag burning, though, they like stomping on that as much as they like hiding behind the flag. It actuallly DOES bring the mouth breathers out to vote--and it could have motivated the GOP base in 06, to say nothing of 08. Look at the slender thread we hold the Senate by, and think back to those close Senate contests. Something like that amendment push might have flipped a close race or two against our favor.

Your last line was a lame little dig. Nowhere were we DISCUSSING her IWR vote, were we?

Yet you toss that bomblet in an effort to falsely suggest that I was "avoiding" the subject. When it wasn't even on the radar in the context of this conversation.

Cheap shot. It's the mark of a poor debater who can't support his own argument, too, when you make untrue assertions as to the content of the discussion solely to try to wriggle out of a tough spot. Firing for effect with a "Yeah BUT" like that always misses the mark and reflects poorly on you.

I am unimpressed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #146
225. I refer you to post 131, upthread. You were the one who focused on flag burning to the exclusion
of everything else; I specifically called it "ancillary crap" and an "annoyance".

I've said my peace- I'm tired of lame political calculations. Like I said; Hillary's people seem to base their assumptions on the idea that the American People are too dumb to have mature discussions on everything from war to race to, yes, free speech. I'm tired of that approach, and I think it's misguided to boot.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #225
252. Well, you didn't mention that IWR vote in THAT post, either.
You brought up two points that you had gripes about, and I engaged you on one.

I have said my piece, too, but further discussion appears nonproductive. You have a nice day.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #252
274. I hate to be that dude who needs to get the last word, but I beg to differ. Here's a link.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=5223141&mesg_id=5229721

And the quote:

"Her vote for the IWR, her subsequent refusal to admit it was a mistake... BIG problems with this Democrat."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 01:52 AM
Response to Reply #274
278. Yep, you are right. I stand corrected. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #146
248. Do you really think that the GOP would have tried that?
As long as there is one liberal senator, like Feingold or Kennedy, a flag burning constitutional amendment would never have passed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #248
253. Didn't HAVE to pass--do you think an Anti Gay Marriage Constitutional Amendment would pass?
That "awful" Bill Clinton triangulated with DOMA (a law, and laws are EASILY repealed) in order to avoid that kind of mucking about with the Constitution on that matter.

The problem with Constitutional amendments, though, is that you can only FIRE ONCE. Afterwards, it becomes much more difficult to beat that horse again. It's why the GOP likes to THREATEN. Then, we throw them a stupid meaningless bone, and they go off in a corner and chew on it.

Who remembers the ERA? Anyone? That's one that SHOULD have passed. Like this sort of thing is so "dramatic:" http://www.equalrightsamendment.org/era.htm

THE EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT

Section 1. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex.

Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.

Section 3. This amendment shall take effect two years after the date of ratification.




We had high hopes for that, but equality wasn't a priority for Americans. Still isn't, apparently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #253
268. agree on the era
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #19
36. I would like to see her on the Supreme Court nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Umbram Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #36
50. Not a good idea.
I'd rather see her as VP or anything else she wants. For that matter, I'm an Obama supporter and I'd rather see Clinton beat Obama than see Clinton on the SCOTUS.

We need to keep putting judges on the Court, not politicians. The last thing we need is more Americans questioning the legitimacy of the Court. It isn't that Clinton wouldn't do a good job, it's simply that it would be poking a bee hive as far as a constitutional crisis goes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ekwhite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #36
56. That would be a good choice also
But it won't happen unless we win a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate. I, for one, would love to see Antonin Scalia's face the first time she shows up in black robes. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Daemonaquila Donating Member (413 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #56
251. That would be delicious!
I can think of a lot of folks who'd make a better Justice, but she'd be a passable appointee. It sure would be great to see the faces of the conservative appointees, too. Say whatever else you want, but she'd be effective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JimGinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #36
59. Kind Of Hard To Justify Since She Flunked DC Bar Exam
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BumRushDaShow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #59
78. And like Harriet Miers, she has no judicial experience.
Most if not all of the modern justices were either Federal district or appeals court judges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #36
60. Freedom of Speech does not extend to video games?
SCOTUS requires highly principled views, not politically popular ones. Check out her video games record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 04:48 AM
Response to Reply #60
153. Saving my kids from dangerous video games by sending them to the front lines. Nice record. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasquatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #153
240. You see if they're dead they can't play, distribute or create violent video games
I know this sounds cold hearted and illogical, but it's the same logic that we use for disproportionate amounts of enlistment of minorities and drugs.
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woolldog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #36
80. She isn't qualified to be on the Supreme Court
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #80
176. What qualification does she lack that would
prevent her from sitting on the Supreme Court
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #176
190. Scruples n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #190
267. Where is that requirement in the Constitution
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crankychatter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 01:24 AM
Response to Reply #36
135. Doesn't being a judge require judgement?
I mean, I'm no rocket scientist... just sayin'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #36
179. As big of a disappointment she has been in the Senate...
with her IWR and Kyl-Lieberman votes, she would probably be the one to help overturn Roe. v. Wade on the SCOTUS.

She can't be trusted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cosmocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #36
232. NEVER, NEVER, N E V E R going to happen ...
I don't know where people dream this one up to begin with, but let's be completely clear here ...

The right wing would, LITERALLY, bear arms and storm DC if Hill was a Supreme Court candidate ...

I am not joking ... There is NO group that is more invested in the Supreme Court than the religious right, and Hillary is literally the anti-christ to these people ... It would be complete and total anarchy if she was a candidate ...

AND, any D president would know that, and not even consider nominating her ...

Seriously ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kber Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #19
171. I'll bet she'd be one of the best Senate Majority Leaders in history!
And I've always (well, for the past 6 - 8 years) thought so.

I think Hillary's skills and interests are so perfectly suited to the Senate. I'd surely support her over Reid any day of the week!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #19
196. Clinton for Majority Leader? No, but Kucinich for Speaker of the House? YES
now THAT would be a major coup for progressives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
20. more than delegate math, it costs money to run her campaign and she is basically out
that really is a big deal. you can't do this for free, well, Penn, Wolfson and Grunwald won't for very long in my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. I hope she manages a good exit.
The Clintons have been important to Democrats. They have also been incredibly destructive but, maybe, that goes with the territory.

I hope they manage to bow out with dignity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #20
92. Exactly...
Haven't heard too much crowing about the fundraising numbers for March so far. Not hearing about how well they're doing and that crazy Elton John Concert where there charging between 500-2300 a ticket says something is up on that front.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ksquire Donating Member (110 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #20
231. not having them would help IMHO. shes better than them nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
22. Are you privy to inside info?
If so.... any indication of WHEN this graceful exit might occur?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #22
30. I'm not sure about original poster putting information like this on an internet forum
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #30
45. Wouldn't it be fitting? Most of the stuff they put on the internet hurts her
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #22
34. BooMan (the dkos diarist) may be.
He's been blogging for awhile and might have the necessary connections.

Coming from him, it has a little credibility to me. Only a little, because he is still only a blogger, and what he hears would not necessarily be fully ripe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
23. I don't see how she survives the First Lady Schedules and BosniaGate.
It's just awful. She really set herself up with that whopper about sniper fire and canceling welcoming ceremonies. Next up, it looks like reporters are going to dig deeper into her "I helped bring peace to Northern Ireland" claim. NAFTA = also v. bad.

The flurry of stories from the likes of Halperin and the folks at Politico are going to begin to take hold in the next news cycle. Bill Richardson was a serious blow, because he illustrated to other wavering superdelegates that you actually can cross the Clintons and live to have a political career. Yes, you can!

I don't see Hillary dropping out before PA, but it would be kind of goofy to drop out the day after a big PA win. She may very well be holed up with her inner circle, taking a cold, hard look at their finances, and they may reach the conclusion that it's better to retire her debt and go back to the Senate than continue to duke out something she has a mere 10% chance of emerging from victorious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. man......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ekwhite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #23
57. Probably even less than 10%
I don't see any way she can win the nomination that isn't divisive. A brokered convention means a McCain victory, with Senator Clinton taking the blame. She can see the handwriting on the wall. It is now a matter of how to get out with her dignity intact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woolldog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #23
81. Do you think she believes her lies?
or is she just shameless?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mythyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #81
129. that question hurt my head
.... both? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PetraPooh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
31. IF 'their people would have some kind of role" is a condition; I say NO WAY!
We need no more of "their people" in this fight; they have been a disgrace to the Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nxylas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #31
47. Might be better to have them inside pissing out
than outside pissing in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #47
52. Excellent point.
NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oilwellian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #47
58. Oh sure....can you just picture...
Bill Clinton roaming the halls of an Obama White House? No how no fucking way. Perhaps Hillary can join up with McCain and run as his VP. It's time to cut the head off of the DLC and their insidious control of the Democratic party for the past 20 years. No more DINOS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ekwhite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #58
65. Why wouldn't Obama welcome Bill Clinton to the White House?
He was the only Democratic president to be elected to a second term since JFK, and the only Democratic president to serve a second term since Truman. He would make a good adviser, but I doubt he would be interested in serving in a full-time capacity now. Senator Clinton would actually make a good AG or Secretary of State.

As far as her joining up with McCain, why in the heck would any Democrat want that to happen? That would be very bad news for our party. She would take a large chunk of voters with her, and allow McCain to distance himself from the wingnut vote he has to court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #65
109. Absolutely no on all counts
Who gives a shit if Bill was re-elected? What happened to the party during his two terms? It was severely weakened. And why the hell would we want Hillary Clinton as either Attorney General or Secretary of State? She isn't particularly qualified for either position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #65
126. I'm sorry, but Hillary is far too "hawkish" to be S.O.S....
and I want Edwards for AG. That being said, put her in a leadership role in the Senate, and forget about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
verges Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #65
183. Kennedy
was not re-elected. Johnson was, but he only served less than a term and a half. Truman served about a term and three quarters. FDR was the last Democratic President before Clinton to serve two full terms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reichstag911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #65
236. JFK was elected...
...to a second term?!? Wasn't he...um...dead? Perhaps you meant FDR? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #31
88. I agree...they can go piss
off in bloody disgrace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shayes51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
32. I hope not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intaglio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
35. Someone on this board suggested Hillary for Supreme Court
Makes sense - and would keep her out of the chain of command in the Administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. That was mentioned as a potential in the Kos piece, too --
I think she'd be an excellent Supreme Court Justice. I do believe she sincerely cares about people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #38
107. Lots of conflict of interest re any corporation which gave money to her or bill
Whether campaign donations or consulting fees. She'd have to recuse herself from a lot of cases because of the parties involved, and also any cases challenging laws she voted for or against in her years in the Senate.

Plus, she has no judicial experience at lower levels, either federal or state.

Plus, she has decades of bottled up negative emotions from what she has endured. I think she needs about 5 years of intense psychotherapy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Olney Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #38
116. I believe she does too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BumRushDaShow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #35
82. She doesn't have the qualifications...
It was noted upthread that she didn't pass the D.C. bar nor has she ever served as a federal (or any other) judge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagickMuffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #35
106. Bad idea, because of her ties with Fellowship or "the Family"


When Clinton first came to Washington in 1993, one of her first steps was to join a Bible study group. For the next eight years, she regularly met with a Christian "cell" whose members included Susan Baker, wife of Bush consigliere James Baker; Joanne Kemp, wife of conservative icon Jack Kemp; Eileen Bakke, wife of Dennis Bakke, a leader in the anti-union Christian management movement; and Grace Nelson, the wife of Senator Bill Nelson, a conservative Florida Democrat.

Clinton's prayer group was part of the Fellowship (or "the Family"), a network of sex-segregated cells of political, business, and military leaders dedicated to "spiritual war" on behalf of Christ, many of them recruited at the Fellowship's only public event, the annual National Prayer Breakfast. (Aside from the breakfast, the group has "made a fetish of being invisible," former Republican Senator William Armstrong has said.) The Fellowship believes that the elite win power by the will of God, who uses them for his purposes. Its mission is to help the powerful understand their role in God's plan.

The Fellowship's long-term goal is "a leadership led by God—leaders of all levels of society who direct projects as they are led by the spirit." According to the Fellowship's archives, the spirit has in the past led its members in Congress to increase U.S. support for the Duvalier regime in Haiti and the Park dictatorship in South Korea. The Fellowship's God-led men have also included General Suharto of Indonesia; Honduran general and death squad organizer Gustavo Alvarez Martinez; a Deutsche Bank official disgraced by financial ties to Hitler; and dictator Siad Barre of Somalia, plus a list of other generals and dictators. Clinton, says Schenck, has become a regular visitor to Coe's Arlington, Virginia, headquarters, a former convent where Coe provides members of Congress with sex-segregated housing and spiritual guidance.

We contacted all of Clinton's Fellowship cell mates, but only one agreed to speak—though she stressed that there's much she's not "at liberty" to reveal. Grace Nelson used to be the organizer of the Florida Governor's Prayer Breakfast, which makes her a piety broker in Florida politics—she would decide who could share the head table with Jeb Bush. Clinton's prayer cell was tight-knit, according to Nelson, who recalled that one of her conservative prayer partners was at first loath to pray for the first lady, but learned to "love Hillary as much as any of us love Hillary." Cells like these, Nelson added, exist in "parliaments all over the world," with all welcome so long as they submit to "the person of Jesus" as the source of their power.

http://www.motherjones.com/cgi-bin/print_article.pl?url=http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/2007/09/hillarys-prayer.html



I would rather her stay in the Senate, perhaps replacing Reid as the Majority Leader.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #35
111. She might refuse that in lieu of running for prez again in 4 or 8 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gorekerrydreamticket Donating Member (422 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #111
272. but she's going to have the "stink" of a loser after this...don't think people will be lining up to
Edited on Mon Mar-24-08 10:28 PM by gorekerrydreamticket
give money again...mainly because she's losing what was supposed to be a cake walk...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 04:51 AM
Response to Reply #35
155. Not qualified. Period. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NC_Nurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
37. I love the suggestion that she could be looking to get a Supreme Court
appointment. That would make my f*ckin' day to watch all the RW'ers howl and moan over that. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #37
46. Oh wow, I would love to see that.
Justice Roberts would pee his robes and Judge Thomas will pee his Classic coke can with the pubic hair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ORDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #37
71. The pay is awful though. SCOTUS judges get squat for the amount of work they do. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NC_Nurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #71
84. I'm sure Bill can bring in the big bucks. She can keep them in the news, and
he can keep them in the $$$. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 01:33 AM
Response to Reply #71
139. I don't think the Clintons are hurting for cash.
When you've got $25 million in the bank, even a six figure salary is just pocket change.

In the Senate, where just about everyone there is a millionaire, and this extends to much of the House, the Presidency and the SCOTUS, they've already got more money than they know what to do with - at that point, it's all about power, status, losing face...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TBF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #139
235. I don't think they are hurting either --
and I wonder where that cash comes from. Would love to see those tax returns released. Any day now...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reichstag911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #71
237. You're joking , right?
Providing your clerks with the rubber stamp for decisions drafted by corporate lobbyists for what, six months out of the year? Whatever the (majority of the) current rogues' gallery of a Supreme Court is paid (by us, the taxpayers) is too much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sudopod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #37
132. Hillary on the Supreme Court is a winner!
1) It would put her law experience to great use.
2) It would keep her from being able to participate in any more bureaucratic empire building.
3) The reichwing would do barrel rolls till doomsday.

I don't see how this can lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 04:52 AM
Response to Reply #132
156. Hillary is not qualified. She didn't pass the DC bar exam and has never been a judge. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
39. I won't believe it until something a little more official than some random blog posting
But if her campaign is really running on air (as opposed to actual money) once again, many of her contributers will begin to wonder what they're actually giving money for...if they haven't already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UALRBSofL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
40. I put no credibility in DKos
This is why many people have left them the past few weeks. They are known for there gutter reputation of being ant-Clinton. That being said, I would take this information as if it came from Faux news. This is just another attempt to brainwash the general public in thinking Hillary doesn't have a chance for the nomination. DKos has been doing everything in it's power to paint Hillary in a negative way to convince the public to vote for Obama. DKos is knows as Faux news of the left wing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 07:02 AM
Response to Reply #40
162. Booman is not just some blogger on KOS - he is the "Booman Tribune"
He has had his own highly respected blog for some time, the Booman Tribune, so while of course we should treat the story skeptically since it is unsourced, this is not just some troll cruising KOS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keep_it_real Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
41. From the article, "There is no way that Hillary will be president...
. . . or vice-president, but she might be able to negotiate something of value."

I'm speechless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #41
94. Does the Obama family have a dog? HRC can be the WH pooper scooper
Cuz that is the only valuable service she has left right about now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crankychatter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #94
137. Nope, that's MY contract tyvm
My good "service sector" career
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #94
178. Sounds as though you'd be perfect for that. You're shovelling so much shit at DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PM7nj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
42. oh please! oh please!
oh please let this be true! It probably isn't... but please let it be true!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Utopian Leftist Donating Member (204 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
43. Hoping and praying
Oh, PLEASE, make this so! Or at least let us (both camps) go back to campaigning in a friendly and professional manner like we were before the "kitchen sink." I'm so tired of all the dirt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
48. Just remember, some people will do anything to avoid re-opening their tax returns
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
writes3000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #48
51. You make a good point here. It's so bizarre they haven't released them .
Hmmmmmm......

I wonder if there are indeed a few bombs in there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
55. Can't say what's doing in the behind-the-scenes world, but
Edited on Sun Mar-23-08 04:17 PM by Old Crusoe
agree with you that the salt shaker should be kept on the table.

As for a role for the Clintons in an Obama administration, I suggest they lead a vigorous and heroic effort to revivify the mythic metropolis of New Orleans with a view toward establishing maximum vibrancy and international reclamation of position.

The Clintons have a fat Rolodex full of high-income donors. Let's see them dedicate themselves to people who were victims of both the wrath of Hurricane Katrina and the cruel negligence of George W. Bush.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #55
99. Great idea for
the Clintons..in fact brilliant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #55
127. OC, as usual, you've hit the proverbial nail on the head....
That would truly be awesome, and would go a long way towards redemption in the eyes of the party base.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
61. I think this is now being forced on her more than anything
This story speaks volumes of (maybe) why this story is out there, and why Richardson said what he said: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x5223574

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bolo Boffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
62. SECSTATE or SECDEF
I don't think she would want Vice President. But Secretary of State or Defense sounds right up her alley.

Obama's backing for Senate Majority Leader would also be
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ekwhite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
64. What role could Senator Clinton have in the Obama administration?
I don't see her running as Vice President, for the same reason I don't support her as President. She would energize the right-wing Clinton haters, who otherwise might stay home. Having Obama and Clinton together on a ticket would make them go ballistic. Would she be willing to settle for a cabinet position like AG or Secretary of State?

As far as her supporters, I couldn't think that the people running her campaign would be helpful. Penn and Wolfson have run a horrible campaign. I could see Wolfson as press spokesman, though.

Wes Clark could have the Secretary of Defense spot wrapped up. He would be the perfect person to formulate plans to get us out of Iraq.

What do others think about positions for Clinton supporters?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PM7nj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #64
66. Ambassador to Bosnia! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #66
195. Ambassador to Iraq, afterall she helped to create it ! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bolo Boffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #64
73. Edwards for AG.
I forgot about Clark and SECDEF. He'd probably get it in either administration (Obama or Clinton - McCain's BFF Lieberman is all starry eyed for this in a McCain bracket).

I say Secretary of State or Senate Majority Leader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #73
98. Clark cannot be Secretary of Defense for a couple more years
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #64
101. Clark cannot be Sec. of Defense for a couple more years n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemGa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
69. Oh good Lord, those Hillary haters at DK must be frothing at at the mouth
over this! DU is infected nearly as bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doublethink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
70. Da da da da da da da ......


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mooney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
72. Not in a million years.
The time for a gracious exit was a month ago. She's going at least as far as PA, and if she doesn't lose PA by 20 points, she'll keep going.

She won't stop until she has to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
74. "how their people would have some kind of role in an Obama administration."
I could think (*coughclark*) of some people in Clinton's camp (*coughclark*) who'd be great in an Obama administration, even for (*coughclark*) Vice President!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Miss Chybil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #74
122. I find it odd they are deciding how they will have a role in someone else's
administration. Seems that it would be the other administration's job to decide who will have a role in it. I'll wait for the story on the news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #122
224. The idea would be that it's in both camps' best interest.
Deal-making goes on all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loveangelc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
75. where exactly are you hearing this info?
she won't drop out before PA. She's going to push hard to win North Carolina AND Indiana, if she can't, then I think she maydrop out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
76. I love the Booman Tribune.
the conversation under the post is interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
77. How about we lock them in cages and cart them from town to town
as the "Clinton Petting Zoo"? That would keep them in the loop. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
79. Oh PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE!!!!
I could see a role for her in his administration - not VP, but there are several cabinet positions she'd be qualified for as well as a seat on SCOTUS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BumRushDaShow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #79
83. She's not qualified for SCOTUS
She failed the D.C. bar and has never served as a federal or other judge. The Judiciary Committee would work her over worse than they did Harriet Miers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #83
90. Hmmmm...excellent points!
Thank you for the info - I had not realized any of that!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woolldog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 02:36 AM
Response to Reply #83
144. I love that people think you can just show up
to the Supreme Court without any judicial experience and "wing it." lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BumRushDaShow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #144
177. *shco had Harriet show up
and look how that turned out! :rofl:

And they were serious!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #144
180. Hugo Black had almost no judicial experience. There are plenty of others early
in the history of the country too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
87. DailyKos - a real reliable resource
:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ksquire Donating Member (110 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #87
233. I KNOW I
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
93. Such discussions *now* would be extremely private...
...and IMO unlikely to hit the news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
95. If somehow she could win a primary somewhere, maybe some of her credibility would be restored.
But, I don't think she will play a big role in the General election now.

"Mr. DeVille, I'm ready for my closeup now."

Fade to black.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thoughtcrime1984 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
96. Did I miss something in the story? I don't get that from reading it.
I don't see Booman suggesting that Hillary is discussing her exit. If only it were true, but I don't see it just yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #96
100. You didn't miss it because it's not there. But Booman suggests that there will be some such
discussion at some point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheney Killed Bambi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #100
102. correct
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
97. "The Clintons will be there when they need you," said a Carter friend.
From OP's link

Carter, who felt he was not treated with a lot of respect by the Clintons when they were in the White House, favors Obama.


"The Clintons will be there when they need you," said a Carter friend.

---------------

Yep...just ask Bill Richardson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
104. Obama doesn't owe her ANYTHING.
I honestly don't know who she thinks she is. She lost. She's in no position to make demands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StevieM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #104
118. She hasn't lost yet. And Obama has gotten this far through reprehensible conduct
He has torn her apart on a personal level. And he has misled people--along side threats of tearing the party apart--by claiming that the so-called pledged delegates represent the will of the people (which they don't since caucuses are not elections).

He owes her an apology. As for a cabinet post, that's besides the point. The point is this arrogance on the part of the Obama people that makes them believe they will get all of her voters. Polls indicate that he'll have trouble getting a lot of them. Including my own.

Steve
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 04:59 AM
Response to Reply #118
157. What a fucking ridiculous statement. Another Opposite Day in HillaryWorld.
Obama owes Hillary an apology.

Obama ran an anything to win campaign.

Obama played the arrogance and inevitability cards.

Up is Down and Black is White.


Do you honestly look at the whole world through those glasses? Not since Bush supporters have I seen this kind of cognitive dissonance.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #157
182. It's just bizarre
Who's coming up with this crap? Could they at least try to make sense?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #182
187. This is why I have so many on my ignore list. They have completely lost touch with reality...
what is the value of even debating people like that? All that listening to their warped view of reality can do is piss me off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ksquire Donating Member (110 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #118
234. TRUE!!! HILLARY44.ORG PWN U ALL!!! EXCELLENT NEWS!! FOR HILLARY!!! NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #234
275. Did you post that from your phone?
Good grief. Why don't you just try smoke signals or simple primate grunts, next time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #104
121. No, but the sensible thing in such a close race is to look for ways to bring the party together.
I don't want her on the ticket, but I think a high profile gig or appointment in an Obama Administration might not be a bad way to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 05:01 AM
Response to Reply #121
158. There is no bad way for her to go as long as she goes away. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
105. Hillary is on quicksand
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JLuckey Donating Member (160 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
108. Hillary maybe a lot of things, but she's not stupid.
She needs to pay off her bills, which she has accomplished. Problem is does she want to fight this to the bitter end and go in the financial hole again. She could gracefully SUSPEND her campaign now and if Obama blows up between now and Denver she takes the nomination. It's a win - win situation. By the way I don't post or reply much but I'm Biden/Edwards/ Obama supporter. I also love this place every day, since 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
110. Oh, PLEASE make this be true...
...so we can get on with the necessary task of making sure that mega asshole McCain is SOUNDLY defeated in November!

Please, please, please....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mckeown1128 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
113. Hell hasn't frozen over...
No way will she just drop out. She had several opportunities to do so gracefully. After Ohio and Texas failed to give her more delegates, after Obama's killer speech, after her loss in Wisconsin(which is where I feel she really lost the nomination)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
117. Sometimes in conceding we win it all...
Edited on Sun Mar-23-08 10:41 PM by cooolandrew
I think she stands to gain so much in conceding than going any other route at this point. She will regain the full respect of the party in doing so. The Clinton name will have stronger value in a call for unity speech that would jettson us to the WH. If she shooses this path I wish her nothing but the best and good wishes for her future in the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InAbLuEsTaTe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
119. Excellent news, I give her credit for finally seeing the writing on the wall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kermit77 Donating Member (160 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #119
123. She could be Secretary of HEALTH and Human services - DUHH!
She has experience in the healthcare field. Let her be Secretary of Health and Human Services.

We can tell if this article is true or not. Tomorrow look for the Clintons to make some horrible statement about Obama not being a good CIC or not having enough experience or not loving this country.

If that doesn't happen, then maybe the Clitons are planning an exit strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crankychatter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #123
138. um... she's already a Senator?
just sayin'

but of course if she DID leave the Senate, they could elect a Democrat to replace her. We do NEED more Democrats in the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InAbLuEsTaTe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 07:07 AM
Response to Reply #123
163. There are many positions in which Hillary could serve in an Obama administration. So long as not VP.
Edited on Mon Mar-24-08 07:08 AM by InAbLuEsTaTe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sepdxdem Donating Member (21 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
125. If she really did....
bow out before PA and throw her weight behind Obama she'd again be a hero TO EVERYONE in the party and I think it would catapult the dems into both the presidency and control of the legislature.

I know this is her life's dream, and I honestly believe she feels she is the best candidate, so I can understand why she wouldn't want to give up yet, but if there was ever a time to be a team player, this is it.

From a pragmatic standpoint, bowing out is IMO her best strategy, even if she has 2012 in mind. There's a better chance that Obama loses the general election than her pulling out the nomination and beating McCain.

And even if Obama does win, if she does go the "team player" route she's guaranteed a respected and influential party elder role as long as she wants. She might even end up VP, Secretary of State, or Speaker of the House

At this point she has to ask herself what the cost of all out war is given the slim chance that she can actually reach her ultimate goal of the presidency. It could cost her her career and would likely cause a war within the party that might damage us for years.

For me, this is the point where, despite the fact that I am an Obama supporter, my years of support for the Clinton's is really going to be tested. I'd like nothing more for them to take the high road now and not shake my faith in them as that would really hurt after thinking so highly of both of them for so long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LordJFT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
130. Can you tell us who these big-wigs are?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crankychatter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
134. GSA Chief.... hm... Terry McCauliff for Postmaster?
Terry McAuliffe for Postmaster General
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #134
258. Nah, he would lobby to privatize the Postal Service and contract it to FedEx n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FatDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 01:49 AM
Response to Original message
142. If she does drop out, will Edwards then be ready to endorse somebody?
I kid, JE was my first choice way back when. Just wish he'd endorse is all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spiffarino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 02:28 AM
Response to Original message
143. If so it's great news on several levels...
Primarily that she and her people would want a major role in an Obama administration. Say what you will about the Clintons, but they have some great thinkers at their disposal. The important thing for Obama, though, would be to keep their worst corporate cronies far, far away.

If she bows out before PA it could help heal the rift in the Party, but I don't expect it to happen. I think she's in it for at least a couple more months in hopes that Obama stumbles and his campaign breaks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freedom Train Donating Member (479 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 04:37 AM
Response to Original message
147. Why would she drop out before Pennsylvania?
It doesn't make sense at all, at least from her standpoint. It'd be like when Edwards dropped out BEFORE Super Tuesday. I mean, WTF?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 05:41 AM
Response to Reply #147
160. It'd make no sense to drop right after a win.
And why would she want to stay in if she was to be delivered two losses in NC and IN?

She is in debt and depending on what the internal polls say, I could see a pre-PA drop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InAbLuEsTaTe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 07:16 AM
Response to Reply #160
166. Besides, she lost Texas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 07:13 AM
Response to Reply #147
165. Richardson Endorsement. Money. There are plenty of reasons. We are still 1 month from PA.
Edited on Mon Mar-24-08 07:20 AM by berni_mccoy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 04:38 AM
Response to Original message
148. She did go home. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
161. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
workinclasszero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 07:18 AM
Response to Original message
167. Graceful and Hillary Rodham Clinton don't belong in the same sentence
Hillary won't do the right thing. Its way past time for that now. She has done major damage to the Dem's chances to win in the GE already.

I'm sure Hillary will continue with her scorched earth/kitchen sink strategy against Obama. She is setting herself up for 2012.

Bill and Hill both are working for McCain now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
169. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SwampG8r Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
172. i hope he says yes
and then plays her in the traditional clinton style
after the election who cares what we promised them?
just send em on home
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
174. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susankh4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
175. I would be really sorry to see her concede the presidency
Edited on Mon Mar-24-08 08:42 AM by susankh4
to Mr. McCain so early in the game.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
George II Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #175
206. Is that pathetic comment coming from a Democrat or Republican?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susankh4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #206
227. Dem for 32 years
I know what I am seeing in this primary. Our only chance to whoop McCain's ass was the Clinton/ Obama ticket. And the Dem party has managed to screw us out of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
George II Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #227
279. Clinton dropping out of the race would not concede the presidency, it would ensure it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
181. When you click on a greatest thread and start reading you expect better than this
Edited on Mon Mar-24-08 08:56 AM by higher class
thread.

Some people look forward and don't go to the sewer. I applaud you.

Some poeple don't have any foresight. Perhaps because you are only 18 or so or are Republicans doing a parallel and intentional sewer dive.

If you were old enough you would know that the opponents always come out shaking hands and raising clasped hands at the Convention and after.

I hope when you see this that you learn and perhaps feel a little embarassed for the sewer contributions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
185. Much TOO LATE for a graceful exit - she has already done
extremely serious damage. I hate her for it. Hell would
have to freeze over for me to every even consider voting
for her. I'd rather write in my dog, Larry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
186. Hillary for ambassador to Tuzla. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harry Monroe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
188. A "graceful exit"???!!!
I really doubt it. But even if she were to bow out "gracefully" (I'm sure if she does it won't be pretty or "graceful"; it's simply not in her), I wouldn't give her shit in a paper bag, much less any role in an Obama Administration, after the "disgraceful" and disgusting way she has been acting these past 2 months. Please Hillary, drop out and go ahead and admit you're joining the Republican Party. Your actions speak louder than words; you're simply a closet Republican in Democrat clothing anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigDDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
191. "I am hearing"
that BO thinks HIV was invented by the govt to wipe out black people.
I don't have a link or anything so take it with a grain of salt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
humbled_opinion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
194. I guess Common Sense and Logic Kicked in.... Bye... Bye... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cd3dem Donating Member (927 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
197. Don't tell me Hillary and Bill Clinton called you personally!
sure her numbers are going up and BO's are dropping... makes sense!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kber Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
198. Maybe she just wanted to spend Easter with her family at home?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
200. In Hillary's mind, it's Obama who is making the graceful exit
She was probably really into the discussion until she realized they were talking about her taking the exit. Then I'm sure the fur started to fly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleyAppendage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
202. "Their People" meaning the CORPORATE WHORES who are worried about losing their grip on power.
Heaven forbid if our country actually makes a clean break from 20 years of Bush, Clinton, Bush Rule.

ENOUGH WITH THE BUSH-CLINTON DYNASTY. Begone spot from my eye.

J
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
parkeradison Donating Member (82 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
203. Regarding "graceful exit"
I find this very hard to believe. Hillary will not give up unless she struggles in Pa. These are the Clintons we're talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
204. With the way this campaign has gone, I wouldn't trust a Clinton surrogate in my administration n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
208. Considering the class-free, negative campaign
she's been running, it would be refreshing to see Clinton make a graceful, classy exit - but I'm not holding my breath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
209. Their people would have some kind of role in an Obama administration? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
1)cleaning toilets at the White House
2)White House lawn poop scooper patrol
3)rose garden weed termination
4)employment consultant for DLC members
5)interstate highway beautification project
6)laundry service at Guantanamo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian_rd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
210. The kitchen sink missed
Now she has nothing left but bitterness. The only tool remaining in her arsenal is a shovel with which to keep digging. I'm pleased the media has finally caught up to what anyone with a calculator has known for weeks. But unlike the "hot" story of any given moment, the math will not change. And besides, she's broke. Donors are like investors in thinking: "What will I get in return for my donation?" If the campaign is now locked in 2nd place, then why donate? The only clear-thinking people with an incentive to donate to Hillary now are Democrats or Republicans (thank you, Rush) who for one reason or another want to damage the GE for Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
211. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
213. I just want to thank all of posters above me.
Edited on Mon Mar-24-08 11:14 AM by ronnykmarshall
Your kind words have touched my heart. This is turning out to be a very sad time for me as a Hillary supporter.

The sweet things you all have said will never leave me. I shall never forget them nor forget the lovely charming people wrote.

You're all just living dolls! DOLLS I tell ya!

God Bless you all.

From the bottom of my bowels, I thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ExtraGriz Donating Member (405 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
218. this is far from over....MI and FL revotes havent been settled
Pennsylvania is on the horizon, and is richardson acting as the trojan horse in obama's camp?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1620rock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #218
220. I love Obama, but his supporters on this board disgust me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #220
222. Ya got that right - except for the part about loving obama - I don't...
They should get a room someplace so they can masturbate to this fantasy of theirs that they keep pushing...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #218
223. FL & MI have been settled.
They were settled before they held their primaries. The re-vote ain't happening. Neither the states nor the party have the money to conduct re-votes so we're back to playing by the rules that were laid out before the primaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alter Ego Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
226. Not gonna happen.
You see, this would be election news that DOESN'T give me an ulcer.

All election news must give me an ulcer.

Ergo, this cannot be real.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
228. I hope the hell so. The Hillary insanity is hillarious!
As for the role with Obama? Racist need not apply.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
windbreeze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
229. OMG....
I can't believe what I am reading....I am finally blown away...step back people, step back...Take a good hard look at yourselves and how you are behaving...don't allow yourselves to be drawn in, or encouraged to take part in character assassination of any of our candidates...can't we count on the other party to do that for us??.....I feel as though I need a shower after reading some of these posts, hard to believe they are being posted on a DEMOCRATIC WEB SITE, by fellow DEMOCRATS..wb..(who was always told, you had to be one, in order to know one)...




















Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
238. I pray this is true, we dont need to keep bleeding more money on near worthless efforrts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
242. Offer her Secretary of State and be done with it
Hell, I would simply tell her to name the job - short of VP - and give it without hesitation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baby Snooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
243. Graceful exit?
Edited on Mon Mar-24-08 01:46 PM by Baby Snooks
The only graceful exit possible in her mind will be the one from the stage when she accepts the nomination. Which she still intends to accept. And anyone who thinks different is a fool.

If she can get enough superdelegates, she will win the nomination. And she could care less what "the little people" think about it. Their votes really don't count unless they were votes for her.

She made it perfectly clear in Florida, Michigan and Texas that rules do not matter to her. Or anything else, really, including playing fair. Just winning. Winning is all.

Even if she destroys the Democratic Party in the process and loses to McCain. She still would have won the nomination. And been the candidate.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
244. You're Just Trying to Make Me Feel Better
and while the effort is greatly appreciated, think how crushing finding out this was a mistaken rumor would be....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greyghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
246. Make it so indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
247. KICK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticalAmazon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
249. NO role for Hillary in an Obama administration. She would stab him in the back in a heartbeat.
Plus, Obama would have to deal with Bill Clinton's obsession with running the country again.

If Obama were to offer her a role in his administration, I'll just stay home this election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
255. such a relief
wishful thinking
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
260. KICK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
261. She must be feeling the heat from the security breach but
if she did get out now at this moment the first weekday since the breach came out, then that would make her look that much more guilty. But the good news is that "she didn't flee the country!!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftrightwingnut Donating Member (434 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
264. It wouldn't surprise me if discussions have been going on for a week or more.
I don't watch Fox News enough to know how Clinton has been treated in the last month or so; however, my investigations early in the primaries were quite surprising. Fox seemed to like Hillary. Ann Coulter, of all people, endorsed her over McCain.

This past weekend I had the opportunity to watch Fox News for 24 hours. Obama, Obama, Obama. Virtually no mention of Clinton, except in passing. It's been a week since his Tuesday speech. The Fox and Friends escapade as reported here on DU seemed very strange to me, almost as if a change of direction were in the works. I know that Murdoch and Clinton have some sort of agreement, so it surprises me that Obama is getting all the air time. I believe that this would only happen if 1) Murdoch abandoned Clinton and made a deal with Obama (not likely), or 2) Murdoch knows about an impending deal and is paving the way for his viewers to accept it.

Just my view of the tea leaves...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
270. KICK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesEtoiles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
271. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
273. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crankychatter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 01:52 AM
Response to Original message
277. bet she did more listening than talking
bet she runs independent with her machine

it's all set up and ready to go

they know she built a machine independent of the DNC

that's what she may have TOLD THEM

nominate me or I'll give it to McCain
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC