Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama has nobody but himsefl to blame for his current situation if he loses the general election

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Herman Munster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 07:47 PM
Original message
Obama has nobody but himsefl to blame for his current situation if he loses the general election
Obama had 3 opportunities to finish Hillary off.

1) New Hampshire

2) Super Tuesday where polls had him ahead in California

3) Texas and Ohio where a win in either could have finished her off

The fact that he failed to do so with all his advantages with the media, organization, and outspending Hillary 3:1, says a hell of a lot about how weak a candidate he would be in the general election.

He is not connecting with large segments of he democratic party - working class whites, older voters, women, and latinos.

And that is a problem and whining that Hillary should quit doesn't change the fact that half the party does not like Obama and there will be massive defections if he is to win the nomination. How arrogant. Politics isn't a charity and there shouldn't be special Obama rules like he's some kind of affirmative action candidate because he's black and can't finish Hillary off.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's ridiculous...
If he wasn't connecting, he wouldn't be leading in EVERY way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Herman Munster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. you call winning 51-49 connecting?
when more than half of clinton supporters will either vote mccain or sit on their ass at home if he wins?

Yeah, that's connecting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mooney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
41. Right, the person getting the smaller share of that vote is the one who's connecting.
OBAMA HAS GOTTEN MORE VOTES. Jesus Christ!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. He's not leading in every way
The states Hillary won actually carry more electoral weight than those Obama's won, and I suspect that's how it will remain going into the convention.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. We're not in the GE - he's winning the race being run NOW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. If the superdelegates thought he was a winner they would have handed it to him already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Herman Munster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. what's the point if he wins now and loses to mccain in the general
It's all about the general.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. Fact remains
he's not leading in every way- and the states he's had some trouble in and lost are pretty important ones for the general election.

Ohio and Pennsylvania, for instance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. His leads are small, which is why the SDs aren't just giving it to him.
This could be over RIGHT NOW if the SDs picked him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bellasgrams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
25. BO is not leading in 'every way'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polpilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
27.  Bill Clinton's race baiting has to be outed. This takes time. Obama is patient.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBInMaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. You are ABSENT complex demographic, historical, and machine dynamics. Try PoliSci101.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YankmeCrankme Donating Member (576 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. Everything you say applies equally to Hillary Clinton. What's the point? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
20. Wrong. Clinton wins the usual level of Dem support against McCain
90% of Obama supporters will vote for her, which is typical for any decent major party nominee. 25% of Clinton supporters and 20% of white Democrats won't vote for Obama. These are numbers that are approaching Mondale territory. Even Dukakis won something like 87% of Dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slick8790 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. Your "3 opportunities" are bullshit.
1) maybe if your girl didn't cry and have her little "i'm such a poor woman" moment, and actually talked about the issues instead, things would be different.

2) that was precisely one poll which had him ahead, and you judge him performance on one outlier? you're ridiculous.

3) That's rich. Does your back hurt from moving those goalposts so far? Those were states TAILOR MADE for her demographically, where she had huge leads less than a month before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
7. Where to begin
You say that "He is not connecting with large segments of he democratic party - working class whites, older voters, women, and latinos."

Let's concede the point, but your candidate is having the same problem with independents, young people and blacks. The door swings both ways.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bellasgrams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
28. I don't think you will be seeing as many people voting for him
now that it's been proven he can't walk on water. The kids may still be fooled, but the adults recognize his fatal flaws, and I would be willing to bet there's more to come. He's never been vetted like most politicos but things are starting to emerge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. You can count on it.........there will be mass defections
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
8. Reminder; LET IT SINK! (NT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
splat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
11. Internet discussion is a distorted demographic -- lots of young, more men, techies, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thevoiceofreason Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
14. Your posts sound more and more desperate
Obama has not once said those things. His staff are supposed to say those things -- think before you speak.

Hillary should go into a closed room, with whatever advisors will accompany her, and determine if she can win. If not, she should get the hell out of the way.

And by the way, he connects fine with those segments you mention. She may connect better with them from time to time -- that's ok. No one has said that she does not have her strengths. They just aren't enough. That's why she should, once she bows out, redouble her efforts to get those traditional democratic strongholds to commit to Obama. In my Texas, for example, she could help turn out the hispanic vote for Obama -- noting to the hispanic districts that it is in their best interest (since they had low delegate entitlements because of their massive defection to BUSH in 2000 and 2004). She could, for the first time, be a Clinton who gave a shit about the party instead of herself .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
splat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. 'Desperate' is like 'hysterical' -- for all you know, Hillary will win; events happen
The convention chooses the candidate. Why so anxious to make her quit? Can't your candidate win a long race? If you think he can, no worries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. it's over, give it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bellasgrams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #23
33. Why ARE you folks so anxious to end the race when there are
still several states and millions of people to vote. For one thing BO could very possibly go down in flames in the next couple of months with the trial in IL and his persoal life now being looked into and his continuing racial remarks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #14
44. Think he'd do that for Hillary if roles were reversed?
No way in hell. I love how so many on this board want Hillary to play good lil woman to big man BO. If he gave a damn about the country, he'd support counting FL and MI votes - he doesn't because all he cares about is himself being the winner. His stance on superdelegates absolutely proves that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
panader0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
15. He won Texas
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #15
35. Yup. Against the will of the people n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
against all enemies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
16. Hillary had three opportunities to finish off Obama for the Repubs.

1. By saying McCain was ready for Commander in Chief, and Obama wasn't

2. By having Bill say McCain loved his country and Obama didn't.

3. I can't think of three but by tomorrow she'll screw Obama a couple more times for the Republicans. and it will be reported by Fox News and Hillary supporters will post a link to Fox News like it was some type of progressive media site.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
18. I agree...which is why Hillary has no one to blame but herself for not even beating such a loser.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ej510 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. He lost to Hillary in Ca because of early voting he got more votes...
at the polls on feb 5th than she did. Today he would trounce Hillary here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #21
30. There were also voting discrepancies that kept many votes from being counted until later...
Edited on Sun Mar-23-08 08:39 PM by calipendence
Obama picked up a number of delegates later when the counting finished making the California victory not as big as it once seemed...

Obama actually won in Texas as stated here by getting more delegates when caucuses were added to primary results.

New Hampshire there is still a big question on whether the voting machines integrity were really in order too. By comparison, caucuses, which she likes to dismiss as not as good a measure are a LOT harder for someone to commit election fraud with. They might not be as amenable to getting some people to the polls and also aren't necessarily as desirable from some points of view from the perspective of privacy of one's vote, but they do have their positives too. In addition to not being as "cheatable", they also serve to help get the voter more informed, when people talk in a group setting about why they are voting the way they are, in order to get to resolution on how the commitments should be divided up between the delegates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
22. Wow. What a ridiculous post.
I have never seen anyone so wrong about so much so often.

Face it, your queen has had her obnoxious ass handed to her. It's over, She never had a shot. She'll never be president. If she had been able to steal the nomination, McCain would have crushed her in the GE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoldieAZ49 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
24. He thinks he is going to get the voters because he has the D after his name
rude awakening and the voter blocks you have listed are not all that will not support him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
26. List of answers...

1) Obama got the same amount of delegates from NH as Hillary

2) Obama won more states, more votes, and more delegates on Super Tuesday than Hillary

3) Obama got more delegates out of Texas than Hillary did.


Nice try, Herman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #26
32. And he will still lose the GE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #32
36. Thank you , Nostradamus..... your "opinion" is no more valid than mine....


Hillary is a MUCH bigger liability in the GE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
29. I've heard it all now!
Some fail to give credit to Obama where credit is deserved.

A year ago it was Obama who?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wileedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
34. HIllary was up 30 points in every category 3 months ago
If anyone should be looking in the mirror and blaming themselves for completely brainfarting an election, it ain't Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
37. I don't disagree with everything you said, but the California thing is ridiculous
Half the people there voted early, many before Obama even burst onto the radar screen after winning Iowa. When I saw that Zogby poll that had him ahead by 13 in California a couple days before I knew it was ridiculous.

That being said, I am a little worried about the fact that day-of deciders have tended to break for Clinton in most places, though he had made progress in that area until March 4. I am a little afraid that he will be leading in the general election polls but people will get skittish about his perceived lack of experience or there will be a Bradley effect and he will lose the last-minute deciders. I hope I am wrong but I am concerned about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeaLyons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
38. Agree......Obama will not win the GE
Hillary is still in the race because he has not taken her out, and he cannot beat McCain. That's just a fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mooney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
39. I can't believe the shit you say sometimes.
"Politics isn't a charity and there shouldn't be special Obama rules like he's some kind of affirmative action candidate because he's black and can't finish Hillary off."

What an unbelievably ignorant and off-base thing to say.

This was never a level playing field, but if anyone is benefiting from special rules, it's Hillary. If Obama had lost 11 contests in a row he would have dropped out. In fact, if he had lost five contests in a row, he would have dropped out. Hillary owes the entire fact that she's still in the race to 16 years of name recognition. The fact that she now trails Obama says a hell of a lot more about what a weak candidate she is, not the other way around.

She went into this race with every advantage imaginable --- she was the presumptive nominee before she even announced her candidacy, she has been a household name for the better part of two decades, and she was ahead in some polls by as much as 30%. With all those advantages, she should have put everyone away by Super Tuesday if she had been even halfway competent.

If you see someone blowing those advantages, then you know who the weaker candidate is. (Hint: It's Hillary)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. lets count the votes
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mckeown1128 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
40. Just start the boycott already... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
43. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC