Obama Supporters: Post Your Best Response to the Threatened Invasion !

[K Gardner]

Here's Mine:

[azmouse]

1. My response to them:

:boring:

[blogslut]

2. The best response is no response

Not saying I am strong enough to resist. Just saying the best response is no response.

[K Gardner]

5. I agree :-) Found the pics tho and couldn't resist wasting a post on 'em !

[blogslut]

8. Ahhh, you give me an excuse to post my awesome, cool graphic

;)

[K Gardner]

11. Another keeper.. I'm going to have to bookmark this for awesome pics !

[Cessna Invesco Palin]

12. Yay, wombat! n/t

[TheDoorbellRang]

3. My best response is this is all the height of absurdity

Who are these people posting supposed "lists" from both sides?

The trolls have turned into agents provocateur. I cannot believe supporters from both sides are falling for it. Absolute garbage.

[Mz Pip]

4. Ignore is your friend

maybe that's the best way to handle it.

They can have their own circle jerk threads if they want. Responding to them is a choice.

[Citizen Kang]

6. Hillbot Fail

fail

[K Gardner]

7. ROFL... love that pic :-)

[backscatter712]

9. Give them the *plonk*!

Why should I be part of their audience?

[myrna minx]

10. And for no reason here's Apu:

Apu: A Mounds bar is not a sprinkle. A twizzler is not a sprinkle. A Jolly Rancher is not a sprinkle, sir. Perhaps in Shangri-La they are, but not here.





I honestly don't care one way or the other.

[K Gardner]

13. oh man, I'm over the hill.. going to have to get my grandson to explain this one to me !

[myrna minx]

19. Oh, it doesn't mean anything.

Much like this much ado about nothing "boycott". :hi: It's just a dumb Simpson's reference. :hi: Homer Simpson tries to disguise candy as "sprinkles" on a doughnut, causing Apu to chastise him.

[4_Legs_Good]

21. Who needs the Kwik-E-Mart?

LMAO!

Love it!

David

[LTR]

31. Somebody say "sprinkle?"

Sorry, couldn't resist.

:evilgrin:

[hedgehog]

14. I thought you were referring to an invasion of Iran!

We need to remember what's at stake here!

[NYCGirl]

15. ....

[Recursion]

16. Just go to failblog.wordpress.com

Or



or even

[K Gardner]

17. Awesome link and pics.. thanks !

[tabasco]

18. .

[theredpen]

20. My response

Followed by a *PLONK*

[mckeown1128]

22. self delete

[City Lights]

23. "You are ignoring the author of this thread" is my response to them.

Most of the invaders are already on my ignore list. They're attention-seeking disruptors, and nothing will frustrate them more than being ignored.

[grantcart]

24. better they are in here waisting than actually doing something productive for Clinton

[olkaz]

29. This is the correct answer.

Righteous indignance does not a primary win make.

I make at least as many calls for Obama as I make posts here.

[Ysabel]

25. they are legion their number is 12...

- they really know how to sock it to obama in the DU polls...

:rofl:

[angie_love]

26. "Kiss my Obama supporting ass"

[JoFerret]

27. Oh you POOR POOR things. How will you cope?

How will you possibly cope with an invasion of different points of view?

[clevbot]

28. .

[Tatiana]

30. I'm not happy about it. But more power to them if they actually follow through.

It's sad that this is what things have come to. Even at the height of the Dean vs. Clark vs. Kerry wars, there was usually a certain level of respect for both the poster and the candidate. Now there is just derision and irrational personal hatred.

It would be very interesting to see what the level of discourse looks like during the proposed boycott. If it's the same, then I think the Hillary supporters will have proved their point: namely that they are not the source of the gutter-mentality of this forum.

[LTR]

32. Somebody needs to fill me in

Most of the alleged invaders are already on my ignore list.

Quite a few of them I notice have already been TS'ed.