Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gallop: Obama's numbers go down and tie with Clinton again

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
acrosstheuniverse Donating Member (224 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 01:08 PM
Original message
Gallop: Obama's numbers go down and tie with Clinton again
http://www.gallup.com/poll/105589/Gallup-Daily-Obama-Clinton-Back-Tie.aspx

PRINCETON, NJ -- The Democratic nomination battle -- having undergone significant shifts last week during the Rev. Jeremiah Wright controversy -- is now back to a virtual tie between Barack Obama (favored by 47% of national Democratic voters), and Hillary Clinton (chosen by 46%).

What a mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Prime Mover Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why is that a mess?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Because the party is split exactly in half.
Which is not looking good for uniting behind one candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
my3boyz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. Media is just pissed that their non-stop coverage of Wright
has not destroyed Obama. They will continue on and on until something else gets their attention. They are pathetic because they have been covering it for over two weeks. They go on and talk about something else. Then the next day they go right back to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. "gallop" lol
is that like a scallop?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. At this point a tie is still a win for Obama... he is to far ahead at this point for a tie to hurt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. Going back to early in March, the greatest seperation shown on that chart has been 6 points
Edited on Mon Mar-24-08 01:19 PM by Bullet1987
on March 13 (when Obama broke 50%). The numbers will natually flucuate within that 6 point range. It means no one really has clear favorability on our side. Which is likely more due to the nature of the campaign right now than anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enki23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. statistically insignificant fluctions. there was no real "lead" in the first place
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flor de jasmim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
8. The national voters don't vote until November - so it's meaningless
It's their way of keeping everyone on their seats -- he's UP, he's DOWN, it's a TIE... It creates a bit of excitement but otherwise means nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
9. Try Rasmussen today......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woolldog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. It seems as if the rasmussen polls
lag a bit in relation to current events.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
10. I wish we could stop obsessing about minor fluctuations in daily tracking polls.
It doesn't mean a damn thing. It's waste of bandwidth to even post it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
11. If this forums views represented anything other than La La Land, Hillary would be polling at 18%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC