Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

In this thread, Bosnia veteran Dmesg explains why snipergate really bugs him

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:18 PM
Original message
In this thread, Bosnia veteran Dmesg explains why snipergate really bugs him
I didn't get a combat action ribbon for my deployments into former Yugoslavia, because the ground was considered "permissive" (my regiment's 14 casualties were all vehicle accidents, occupational accidents, sports injuries, or illness). I didn't even get a National Defense Ribbon because of the diplomatic status of the deployment (I'm not bitter about that; those diplomatic statuses are an important part of the political context in which these "brushfire" deployments play out, and sometimes those of us on the ground have to bite down on a big juicy one for the greater good).

The more I think about it, the more I realize this is what really bugs me: if a sitting First Lady were ever remotely subject to tactical danger, we failed. Our job was to secure and stabilize the area, and we made damn sure that a visiting dignitary would not be subject to dangers. Now, 1996 was different from 1998 (those were my two deployments there), but 1996 was easier. Ground operations had ceased, and the civilian population was happy enough for the respite that they didn't mind the occupation (and they still don't: remember, Bosnia-Hercegovina is still partitioned and occupied).

We didn't fail. We made the area safe. Where the **** does she get off claiming a danger we faced in her name?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AnarchoFreeThinker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. kicked and recccccccccccccccccc'd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
70. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. get over it. This smells. Using your position in the military to launch this political attack
She misspoke. Get over it. Go fight your campaign against her on issues which really matter, not this hyped bullshit. That's my opinion. And I won't put my resume in front of it to impress or intimidate anyone into accepting my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. What exactly "smells"?
And I won't put my resume in front of it to impress or intimidate anyone into accepting my opinion.

If anyone feels "intimidated" by my anonymous post on DU, I apologize; it was not my intent. My status as a veteran gives me no special wisdom about who should be President. It does, however, give me factual knowledge about the state of B-H in 1996 and 1998, just like my status as an Iraq veteran gives me factual knowledge about the state of Iraq in 2003. None of those remotely make me more qualified than you to judge who should be our next President, and I apologize if I was coming at it somewhat high and trying to stifle those who disagree with me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. don't play with the vermin, dmesg. k&r!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. bigtree is not remotely "vermin"
Edited on Wed Mar-26-08 01:27 PM by dmesg
In many ways I rather like him/her.

On edit: "him". And from MD, so that's another plus in his favor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. No apology necessary. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveAmerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. Thanks for the calm response
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
19. I'm just frustrated by this line of attack, dmesg
I think it's overblown and amazingly hypocritical of anyone who supports her rival to complain about statements which turned out to be false, no matter the subject. I apologize for leaving the impression that your own position and views aren't worthy of debate. I just resent the suggsetion (a slippery slope, I think) that one's position in the military makes a position or opinion valid. It does however, lend credibility, especially with the integrity YOU have shown on this board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. I appreciate and sympathize with your frustration
And I also respect the integrity you've shown on this board. My own perspective is that I think multiple statements of difficult-to-forget fact or non-fact is hard to describe as having "turned out to be" false.

That said, I hate the tendency of some veterans to turn veteran status into some sort of unimpeachable political asset, and I wanted to personally apologize if this thread had come off that way to you.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #24
33. my overreaction, entirely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveAmerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #19
40. I know I'm not the manners police around here, but that was an excellent response...
I think that Wright and Bosnia, once past their 'Best Buy Date' should be dropped.

This poster is doing something that's (in my opinion) difficult for the military; speaking up about politics. They're not allowed to speak their minds so when an opinion shows up in a political forum, I think we should pay attention (as long as their not threatening, etc).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #4
87. dmesg, don't apologize. you didn't intimidate anyone. arm chair
generals and disruptors don't count. hugs, honey. you said your piece and you get respect. period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. I'm sure that you would say that it is a volunteer force
and they signed up for it. Well these folks lay their lives on the line for Americans and the politicians that 'lead' us. They deserve respect. I am guessing that you have never served or you would have not responded in such a demeaning way. She that misspeaks must not be obeyed...but questioned...get over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Your opinion is gradually evolving
Congratulations.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. She misspoke 4 of five times
She's basically a lying sack of shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DefenseLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. What is your definition of "Misspeak"?
I am curious what that definition would be for one to conclude that making up a story about being shot at and retelling it in various versions in the face of overwhelming evidence that it is factually untrue would fit a definition of having "misspoke".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #12
55. I was being facetious -
She lied through her fucking teeth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DefenseLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #55
65. No, I was asking bigtree
He wasn't being facetious when he said "Get over it. She misspoke." I am still waiting for his definition, although interestingly his definition might just be "to lie through one's fucking teeth".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InsultComicDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #65
67. "misspeak"
I believe the term can apply very broadly to many different actions. It can be as benign as mispronouncing something, or as malignant as an out-and-out lie.

So to say that one misspoke does not rule out a lie.

However, I would consider it a "weasel word" applied in this sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DefenseLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #67
68. I don't think lying falls under the definition of misspeaking
"To speak or pronounce incorrectly" doesn't not encompass lying. Just people people use the term broadly enough to cover lying doesn't mean they are using the term correctly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harry Monroe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #67
82. Oh?? Then I guess Bush has simply been "misspeaking" these past 7 1/2 years??
He's hasn't "lied" to us a single time. He simply "misspeaks" every time he opens his mouth!!!:sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InsultComicDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #82
93. Every lie is a misspeak
Every misspeak is not a lie

Confucius says...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveAmerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. That was horrible and uncalled for, he gave his opinion from his personal experience.
I have forgiven you in the past days in consideration of your passion for your candidate, but you have now crossed over to the unforgivable.

I am speaking as someone who went from Edwards to trying to commit myself to one of the last two candidates. WHAT YOU ARE DOING HERE DOES NOT HELP HILLARY CLINTON'S CAMPAIGN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. My lifes ambition is not to 'help Hillary Clinton's campaign. I come here to express my opinion
along with the rest here. I expect that opinion to be challenged on equal footing with ALL comers, regardless of position or resume.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. You're really going to the mat on this one, and it's making you look totally ill in the head.
Now you're insulting actual vets? Oy vey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. Are Vets always exempt from criticism?
what a crock.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. From you, Bigtree, yes.
You are, finally, the PERFECT Hillary supporter. They were asking about you over at the duMP'er board.

c ya

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #23
31. If this place 'dumps' me it will be a hoot.
good luck with that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #23
58. I have had Big Tree on IGNORE for a long time now....
...and I can see from the responses he is getting that things have not gotten better with him.

How sad....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #20
28. No, but you might want to have more than just a hunch to avoid looking the ass when doing so.
You seem to be finally hitting the anger stage of grief...that's good. Progress! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. an ass? I think that depends on where you stand in this junior high school cafeteria spat
over this election. But, thanks for your personal observations. I'm really soaking them in. *sniff*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #32
42. Yes, that's exactly what you're making of yourself.
I've both defended you and jumped on you, so it has NOTHING to do with who I support (especially since Kucinich and Edwards aren't even the race anymore). You're lashing out in frustration, and now insulting vets based on little more than your own opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. You are really delusional if you think I'm here hanging on what some anonymous poster says
Edited on Wed Mar-26-08 02:28 PM by bigtree
. . . they think of me. It's incredible that anyone would believe I'd really care in the least. I didn't mean to 'insult' the vet and I think you know that. I question the suggestion that a military association is enough to lend credibility to comments. Enough with the overblown criticisms. You obviously (and deliberately on my part) know NOTHING of any value about me. So get off of the personalizations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #45
48. I don't expect you to care what I think.
Edited on Wed Mar-26-08 02:47 PM by Forkboy
That's fine, and a healthy approach to online forums. But I didn't know that you didn't mean to insult vets, as thats what you just did by attacking the pilot of the flight with no knowledge whatsoever about him based on nothing more than your desire to defend Hillary.

Maybe if you'd share something of value I would know that about you, but as you don't share that (deliberately) how the fuck is anyone supposed to know? Maybe if you had said that in your post attacking him I would have known, but you didn't. So it sure as hell did look like you meant to attack vets that were speaking out against Hillary. :shrug:

On edit - In light of dmesg's post below I offer you peace, and lets move on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #48
54. I'm attacking the notion that their opinion is beyond reproach just because of their service.
And you should know that was my intent, because I expressed it in my comments. The rest is bullshit that you piled on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #54
56. These were your comments Bigtree.
get over it. This smells. Using your position in the military to launch this political attack

She misspoke. Get over it. Go fight your campaign against her on issues which really matter, not this hyped bullshit. That's my opinion. And I won't put my resume in front of it to impress or intimidate anyone into accepting my opinion.



Those were the comments I responded too, and I have my own reasons why that line of attack is so wrong to me. You really layed into dmesg when there was no need, or at the very least, no need to do so in the manner you chose. Lets put it that way.

I won't respond anymore, as I said I would prefer to peacefully move on. I DO like you, but not that line of attack, from you or anyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #56
59. and I recast my statement to reflect how I felt about that impression
but, you know that, as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #42
46. I'll just point out I went to bat for bigtree in this thread
and I hope that's enough to soothe the acrimony.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #46
51. I actually like Bigtree, though I frequently disagree.
In his goodbye thread a few weeks back I told him I'd rather he stayed, and I meant it.

I find it pretty lousy to attack any vet with no actual knowledge of that person. Bigtree may be totally right about that, and he could have tried to back up his assertion with facts instead of just a frustrated urge to defend. He usually does try to put together a solid defense for Hillary here, and he always defends Dems, even when I'm not sure I want to, and he's posted some awesome positive threads in this forum. This isn't his best moment.

However, if it doesn't offend you than I can't let it offend me, and in the spirit of your post here I offer peace to both of you.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #51
53. Me too. Emtions run high
And I'm convinced bigtree meant me no personal offense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #46
79. I really appreciated your diplomatic and wise response.
Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. Get over it? Sorry, this one's going down in the history books
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #17
27. LOL!!

:rofl:


:hi:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #27
83. I'm glad you and Araxen like it
I made it just for bigtree ;) It just doesn't seem fair not to let him have one measly sniper considering there wasn't even a bumblebee flying around when the aircraft landed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Araxen Donating Member (826 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #17
29. ROFL!
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #17
90. My god!
How did she ever escape that dangerous situation :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libnnc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
21. Is Hillary worth you looking like a complete ass?
She's worth that?

You all are a sad, sad lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #21
35. worth looking like an ass, to you? mebbe.
probably, definitely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libnnc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. I feel sorry for you.
Really. You're a pathetic individual.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #36
41. that means SOOO much to me, coming from you
*sniff*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
22. This mispeaking will cost her military votes
count on it

Lying is not a minor thing for active duty, or retired personnel

Lying is NOT tolerated, just like cheating and stealing

Go ahead, call it a mis-peak, and inconsequential.

What she did was brave... but her embellishment really seats badly with anybody who has ever been under fire.

You've never worn a uniform... and I don't expect you to get it either, by the way
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #22
38. And veterans' votes ... as if she cared.
It really is a scorched earth ("burn the village to save it") campaign. A bull is a docile pet in a china shop in comparison to Hillary's campaign.

I'm coming close to going into the kitchen and trashing the four "Hillary" coffee mugs I bought almost eight years ago. The more I see of her campaign (and supporters), the less respect I have for her. It's more than a shame that the first reputable female candidate (since Shirley Chisholm) for the presidential nomination is as abominably destructive as this. Why hasn't she been 1/2 as vicious toward Cheney/Bush?? THEY deserve it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #38
91. "Why hasn't she been 1/2 as vicious toward Cheney/Bush?? "
because she is part of the same group they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Araxen Donating Member (826 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
25. You don't forget or "mispoke" about being shot at
You remember every detail because you're life is on the line. I'll take the word of a veteran over anybody else on this matter especially on this board.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
26. What Hillary did was the equivalent of lying on one's resume....
...

ONCE is a "mis-speak".


FOUR times is a LIE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grinchie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #26
85. Remember the Rule of Three's
One Miss Speak could be a mistake.
Second time is unsettling, but could be forgiven, but be on your guard.
Third time run like hell from that person, because it indicates possible pathological thinking.

"I don't know Peter Paul" -- Hillary Clinton
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
37. She giggled as she lied about being under fire.
If she thinks it's so fucking funny, send her dumb ass to Iraq.

I earned my CIB, I didn't have to lie about it. And I don't giggle when I talk about the times I was under fire. It makes me feel more like crying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egalitariat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
39. She actually made up a lie that, in her mind, bolstered her foreign affairs credibility.
She didn't misspeak. Not at all.

And it does matter. It says a lot about her character, and it implies more about her own self evaluation of the legitimacy of her "35 years of experience".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
44. Gosh, that's rude. I appreciate the OP's point of view and experience.
Also, Hillary did a lot more than misspeak. Seriously. "Misspoke" is when you introduce somebody by the wrong name by accident. "Misspoke" is when you use a curse word in front of your boss.

Creating and telling a very detailed story about being under sniper fire when none of it ever happened is not "misspeaking." It's lying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:44 PM
Original message
dupe
Edited on Wed Mar-26-08 02:44 PM by redqueen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
50. I don't think even her campaign is trying to claim she "misspoke" anymore. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
81. she didn't misspeak, she LIED
as in, she's a LIAR

how can you not grasp that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grinchie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #2
84. Misspoke Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha
Jeez Bigtree, you make it sound like it's an innocent thing.

In my book, it's a real Whopper and demonstrate an incredibly poor judgement on someone who claims to be experienced. Experienced in what? Being mislead by those malicious Republicans and their phony Iraqi Intelligence that forced her to vote YES in the Iraq WAR Resolution?

Or maybe she Mispoke on NAFTA.

Hillary needs a new nickname Miss Poke.

Ok Ok, lets all back off on Hillary, she blew it and made a miss steak. Lets move on. I'm over it.

I really think we need to have a discussion on her Tax Returns and that ongoing Peter Paul vs Hillary Clinton lawsuit.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #2
86. you don't have a resume, bigtree. get over yourself. who cares what you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. good point; future comm. in chief dissing the military? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crispini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
7. Ay yi yi!
:kick: :thumbsup: Dayum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveAmerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. Someone's got some splainin to do! : )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
30. This scandal is NOT going away no matter how often HRC tries to change the subject.
Lying about dodging fire and falsely claiming that you're in "a combat zone" with your daughter?!? Well, that's just shameful LYING and it, in and of itself, is enough to fail the CiC Text, i.e., no go on the character trait of "honesty."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
34. Good Point
You should send that to Cafferty. She should be held accountable for what she said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
43. And here's the really sad part - Bill Clinton did a good job as Commander in Chief.
The peace-keeping mission in Bosnia was a success. The United States did a good thing there, with minimal casualties. Contrast that to the unholy mess that chimp has made of Iraq and Afghanistan.

So Hillary took a success story - something that should be a positive point in her candidacy's favor - and turned it into a negative for her campaign by lying about her tiny part in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #43
47. Exactly: Yugoslavia is my one military success story
We actually were given an achievable mission and achieved it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #47
60. I wish that Hillary's campaign had stuck to that message.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
49. I really wish she hadn't told these lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquarius dawning Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
52. I question your service.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #52
57. I question your intelligence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #52
61. I don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #52
63. Good for you (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #52
72. More swiftboating from Hillbots. Nice...
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #52
92. And who the f&#k are you? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
62. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #62
66. Stay classy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northernsoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
64. Thank you for your service - you did a great job!


:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DRoseDARs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
69. This soldier was not just in Bosnia, but actually present at Sen. Clinton's visit to the air base...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
71. It was even a lie that the sniper fire cleared because there never was any.
Edited on Wed Mar-26-08 11:44 PM by Life Long Dem
K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bensthename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
73. This will cost her PA. She won't get away with making up such a B.S. story about being shot at.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ekwhite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #73
74. Don't count on it
She is going after the 'low information' voters, after all. Or as PT Barnum put it, "nobody ever lost a penny by underestimating the intelligence of the American public."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 12:38 AM
Response to Original message
75. hilary was buttering up her own damn self ..
not thinking how many people it would effect if she ever got busted..or does she think that far in advance except for the 2008 pres run?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norrin Radd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 06:59 AM
Response to Original message
76. kr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
77. Sorry you were attacked in this thread.
Edited on Thu Mar-27-08 08:33 AM by mmonk
In the real world, a first lady and first daughter would not have landed there if it were not cleared of all hazzard and made safe by people like you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juno jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
78. K&R
Thank you dmesg. I understand where the vets are coming from. I never served, nor had inclination to, but my father's older brothers served in combat in WW2, my father and his younger brother served in the Korean conflict, and over the years I have had many friends who served under fire in Vietnam. To claim to have been under fire when you really weren't is a grave insult to those who actually faced fire. My father, who was signal corps (radio operator) always made sure that we understood that he never experience any danger beyond broken fingernails and venomous snakes. he could have made up all sorts of shit to impress his kids, but he didn't. My dad was one of the most honest people I have ever known. I'm no so sure about Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #78
80. I've noticed a consistent truth. Those who have served in combat don't talk about it.
Those who never served in combat but seek to convince others that they did talk about it all the time.

John Kerry says very little about his Vietnam service, which helped cost him the election as he was unwilling to make a big deal out of the swift boat lies.

The shrimp, on the other hand, talks about his "combat" experience all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
88. First, thank you - second, I don't
blame you for being a bit angry at her false assertions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChazII Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
89. Late to this thread but...
I want to say thanks for your observation. You did not fail and I did not care for Hill's words. Thank you for your service as well.:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC