Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Can I ask a question?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
BenDavid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:16 PM
Original message
Can I ask a question?
I saw a great toon that I dare not post here, because some readers tend to pour gasoline over their heads if they see a toon they don't like, so let me ask a question. Of course, you're free to pour that gas anyway - or - you could answer the question.

When the Duke rape case come up, Obama didn't think we needed to have a "frank talk" about race.

When the Jena 6 had that little noose problem in Louisiana, Obama didn't think we needed to have a "frank talk" about race.

But when his pastor made the news, Obama thought it was high time we had a "frank talk" about race.

Can anyone explain his timing? Can anyone explain why he had to lie?

I thank you
Shalom

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Saturday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. You make an excellent point!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yes We Did Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 03:09 PM
Original message
Almost as good as this point...
Can I ask a question? Why did Hillary Clinton vote for the Iraq War?
She is supposed to be a democrat.
Her hustband had the good common sense not to bomb Iraq.
She said Dubya was not to be trusted.

Why only when she was considering a run for president did she vote for the Iraq War?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBGLuthier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. Leave DU for a year. Come back. Same shit still going on.
Democrats tearing the party apart with snideness.

Cute post there. He HAD to make the speech when he DID becuase assholes were using his pastor's comments to smear him and those comments are racially charged. And if you truly do NOT understand that point then god help us all.

Now, exactly where did he lie?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
22. "...why he had to lie?"
Trying in vain to keep up with "Sniper-Fire Clinton." :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. Was he being smeared by the Jena 6 incident? Or the Duke rape case?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countingbluecars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. Obama did make statements
concerning those two cases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Oh man, there you go -- bringing facts to a perfectly good snark. Killjoy! (NT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reflection Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. Probably
because your first two examples involved legal situations which needed to play out before everyone started inserting themselves in the situation. The Rev. Wright controversy was just that, a controversy, and it involved Obama himself to some degree. So I completely understand.

BTW, what exactly did O lie about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DefenseLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. What did he lie about?
I bet I know your answer but I'd still like to hear it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenDavid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
20. Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., repeatedly said,
"I wasn't in church during the time that these statement were made. I did not hear such incendiary language myself, personally. Either in conversations with him or when I was in the pew, he always preached the social gospel. ... If I had heard them repeated, I would have quit. ... If I thought that was the repeated tenor of the church, then I wouldn’t feel comfortable there." Then in his race speech he said 'Did I ever hear him make remarks that could be considered controversial while I sat in church? Yes.'Yep, there is the lie and the whoremedia lets him slide.


On Friday, Obama, in an interview with the Chicago Sun-Times, Obama said something different. “I'll be honest with you. I wasn't in church when any of those sermons were issued.”


Sweet: Obama now says he heard Wright make controversial remarks. Told Sun-Times Friday "wasn't in church" during those sermons.

There is your answer....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #20
31. Oops.... lying again, Ben David


These two statements are NOT contradictory:

"I was not in church for those sermons." (Said in response to the sermons being shown on the cable networks)

"Did I hear Wright say controversial things? Yes."



You see... BOTH statements can be true. Obama was *IN* church when *SOME* controversial things were said by Wright, but not the things that we are seeing in the 5 or 6 sermon snippets on the cable networks.



See?

Not a lie.


But YOUR POST... That *IS* a lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbert Donating Member (548 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #20
32. And he told the truth
Edited on Wed Mar-26-08 03:19 PM by bobbert
The comments made by the pastor that were seen on TV were very strong and he was never present for the clips that were used.

Now, his pastor may have made some comments that made him feel uncomfortable, but not nearly as strong as the comments on the tapes that were on TV, during other sermons. The ones he heard just weren't so horrible that it deemed walking out on his church.

Where is this lie you speak of?


edit: ninja'd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DefenseLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #20
35. Okay. I'll type slowly so you can follow along.
Senator Obama was referring specifically to the portions of specific sermons which were played by Sean Hannity and made the rounds on Youtube. He was shown those clips and asked to comment on them. He said he hadn't been there for those sermons. Do you have evidence that he was? If so you need to call Mark Penn right away. He would be very interested in that information. Later saying he was there when the pastor made controversial statements does not contradict his statement that he was not there when certain specific statements shown in those clips were made. At best you can say he was parsing, but unless you have evidence to the contrary you can't say he was lying. Of course I'm sure a Clinton supporter wouldn't be complaining about parsing now would you? I guess that depends on what the definition of parse, or maybe is, is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shomino Donating Member (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
7. No, you may not ask a question.
If it's a ridiculous question like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
8. "God made time so everything wouldn't happen at once." Joseph Heller
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
9. You make false accusations and you should be ashamed of yourself.
Edited on Wed Mar-26-08 02:35 PM by Breeze54
Obama on 'Jena 6' rally: 'I stand with those who stand for justice'

http://blogs.usatoday.com/onpolitics/2007/09/obama-on-jena-6.html

As thousands of demonstrators march today in Jena, La., calling (USA TODAY's Marisol Bello writes)
for charges to be dropped or reduced against six black teens charged with beating a white classmate,
Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama has issued this statement:


Obama on 'Jena 6' rally: 'I stand with those who stand for justice'

Today I stand with those who stand for justice in Jena. The thousands of Americans from every race and region who have descended on this small Louisiana town carry forth the legacy of all those who sat at lunch counters and took freedom rides to strike a blow against injustice wherever it may exist.

When a noose hangs from a schoolyard tree in the 21st century and young men are treated in a way that is not equal nor just, it is not just an offense to the people of Jena or to the African-American community, it is an offense to the ideals we hold as Americans. I renew my call for the district attorney to drop the excessive charges filed in this case, and I will continue my decades-long fight against injustice and division as president.


His words come a day after the dust-up over a comment attributed to the Rev. Jesse Jackson, that Obama was "acting like he's white" in his response to the news from Jena. Jackson's aides later said his words were taken out of context. Jackson himself said his support for Obama, who he has endorsed, is firm.

Posted by Mark Memmott at 01:49 PM/ET, September 20, 2007 in Democrats, Issues, Presidential race, 2008
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Oops! The OP has been pwned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbonds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. You can't use reality, it has such an Obama-bias.
The OP is very uninformed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky 13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
27. THANK YOU.
I'm tired of this bullshit. People make claims about him with NOTHING to back it up.

CALL THEM ON IT EACH AND EVERY TIME.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
11. Oh, I would LOVE to see any toon you liked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
12. Sorry, but my brain is looping
on the logic of "Can I ask a question?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
13. Obama: Investigate Duke Lacrosse DA Nifong
Obama: Investigate Duke Lacrosse DA Nifong

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/LegalCenter/story?id=2980582&page=1

Presidential Hopeful Says an 'Independent Inquiry Is Needed' into Durham, N.C.,

District Attorney Mike Nifong's Conduct


By LARA SETRAKIAN
ABC News Law & Justice Unit
March 25, 2007

Another voice has joined the call for a federal investigation into the handling of the Duke Lacrosse case -- this one with the punch of presidential politics.

Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., in a written response to a constituent, said that an "independent inquiry is needed" into the conduct of Durham District Attorney Mike Nifong.


Nifong prosecuted and led the investigation into the alleged sexual assault of an exotic dancer at a lacrosse team party in March 2006.

Obama cited the fact that Rep. Walter Jones, R-N.C., has already asked Attorney General Alberto Gonzales for a federal investigation into Nifong's conduct. ABC News has learned that similar requests have been made by Rep. Trent Franks, R-Ariz., and Rep. Tom Feeney, R-Fla.

According to Obama's letter, Jones asked Gonzales to "review new evidence that Mr. Nifong withheld exculpatory DNA results from the defendants in order to determine if his conduct has illegally denied the students their civil rights as U.S. citizens under federal law."

Obama said of the call for a federal investigation that he "will be following its progress closely."

More....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky 13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #13
28. AGAIN... THANK YOU
Keep calling these people on their bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #28
40. You're quite welcome.
The OP is obviously being unfair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
15. Stop being such an ALTER COCKER!
That's just FERCOCKT !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
16. I guess it's only important when he's running for office...
And people are paying attention. Sad when you think about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #16
25. See posts 9 and 13.
*sigh*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. Too bad these things get buried...
I've never read his comments on either until just now. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky 13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #16
29. Please get the facts before you say something stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. Please STFU instead of looking stupid yourself...
I had never seen either of these articles until redqueen so graciously pointed them out to me... check the time stamps on the posts... then blow it out of your ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky 13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. So do you retract your previous insult of Obama?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. Can you read?
I'm not going to lick your fucking boots. Get a fucking life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
17. He was forced to comment on race at that point. It isn't like he planned on it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
18. Just a SMALL clue, OK?
Hillary and the Hillbots were not lying and smearing Obama about the Jena 6 or the Duke rape case...however, Wright is a different matter about which they got personal, racist and ugly. See the difference?

Duh.....:eyes:

Please take off your Hillary blinders and start looking at reality, OK?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
21. Sorry his "frank talk" worked out as well as it did
and PastorGate failed to save your candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
23. Because he was waiting for you to ask this question.
Mr "I have something so inflammatory I dare not post it here."

Truth or just inflammatory???

Gas on a fire, indeed.

Just like you're whole post.

:hurts:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
24. This OP is illogical
Shalom

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
26. Why didn't Hillary give a "frank talk" on race in response to any of these incidents?
Or is the onus for a race talk only on Obama because he's black? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #26
34. She did... Google is your friend...
I admit I didn't bother to Google for Obama's comments, but after reading the entire thread, one would think you would have before saying this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
37. Not fair, and you know that I am not an Obama supporter
The pastor is his pastor. He invited (and disinvited) him for his announcement of his candidacy (and why, or why, does one need an invocation during such an event?)

He married him, baptized his daughter, part of the family.

And since the race is a common thread in this pastor's sermons, and questions were asked, he felt that he needed to reply.

He was not personally involved in the Duke or Jena stories.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crankychatter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
39. you're so slimey you fairly ooze, with this lurid tone
go someplace you belong
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC