Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

We Have Indulged the Clintons Long Enough

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:09 AM
Original message
We Have Indulged the Clintons Long Enough

It's over. Get off the stage.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pbca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. Maybe Jimmy Carter can find something for them to do n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. it takes a clinton to build a village?
but who would want to live there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pbca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Well I wouldn't let them BUILD the village
maybe they can do some painting though?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelewis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #4
18. When Hilary was in Bosnia, she built 2 villages with some duct tape and a swiss army knife. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pbca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. What I heard was that she was actually catching bullets in
midair, flattening them out with her bare hands and using them to make roofing shingles...that's what I heard
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. It's true!
As far as I know...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
3. Yeah, the 90's are soooo ancient history. Stop the indulgence now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
5. You know, they have had 8 years to shape this country. They did
some good things. She's a Senator now, she's well-respected, and she's doing some good things there. Bill does some good things in his post-Presidency. They raised a fine daughter. They still have a lot to contribute. I would like to like them again, but I can't, until they concede that they HAD 8 YEARS and it's time to let another Democrat take the reins of power. They need to let go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. She WAS well respected.
She's done a lot of damage to herself. She's never going to have the solid wall of Democratic machine support she's had up until now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fredda Weinberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
7. Sorry, you're going to have 2 learn 2 endure opposition - you think McCain
will just drop out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. This is not opposition, it is obstruction.
Edited on Thu Mar-27-08 09:46 AM by Stephanie
She has become a bad joke. The new phrase she is floating, "so-called pledged delegates," is just laughable. I'm embarrassed for her.




Last question Senator. Some people look at the current state of the delegate counts and say the only way you can win the nomination is at the convention, with a convention where delegates move around perhaps, and you'll make your case side by side. Are you comfortable if that's the way you win the nomination, going all the way to Denver and winning it there? Is that a comfortable outcome for you?

You know it's the same thing for Senator Obama. Neither of us will reach the number of delegates needed. So I think that that is, you know, the reality for both of our campaigns. And all delegates have to assess who they think will be the strongest nominee against McCain and who they believe would do the best job in bringing along the down-ballot races and who they think would be the best President. And, from my perspective, those are all very legitimate questions, and as you know so well, Mark, every delegate with very few exceptions is free to make up his or her mind however they choose. We talk a lot about so-called pledged delegates, but every delegate is expected to exercise independent judgment. And, you know, I'm just going to do the best I can in the next 10 contests to make my case to the voters in those elections and then we'll see where we are.

Sounds like you'll still be in the race by the time the next few issues of TIME magazine get published.

(Laughs) Well, I think so.

http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1725514-2,00.html




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fredda Weinberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. I'm not. Women have to learn that others aren't qualified to set our
Edited on Thu Mar-27-08 10:31 AM by Fredda Weinberg
expections for ourselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. What?
You're incoherent. What are you trying to say?

HRC has moved the goalposts so many times we're all getting dizzy. Now she would like to say that pledged delegates are not actually pledged. She's gone over the edge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fredda Weinberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Nope. She's my candidate n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jakem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
9. times is up, clintons!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
10. what do you mean by "indulged"? in what way did we indulged them?


what are you saying?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. It's like playing Scrabble with a child.
You're the adult so you indulge them when they want to change the rules so they can win, or when they play a word that doesn't exist. But eventually you have to stop indulging them, for their own good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. we haven't done that, the dems haven't done that. you are making it up


give me a specific indulgement
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Allowing her to pretend that she can somehow "win" when it's been over for weeks now.
It's just a courtesy at this point, but it's gone on too long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #17
26. you live in some other world then I do

Hillary is not being "indulged"

however, she is being attacked by other so called dems, 24/7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #26
39. She is being CORRECTED when she LIES
Which is fairly often.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #11
40. Maybe if you try a little harder
you could sound even more condescending. What are you suggesting? Taking them out back and shooting them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #40
47. Um, what? As I clearly stated, I'm asking them to get off the stage.
For the sake of the Democratic Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #10
16. they've been indulged since Wisconsin named their fate
They haven't had a chance since the Land of Cheese handed them their walking papers.

They are still around because of Money, Media, and Manipulation.
But Hillary's candidacy is little more than an annoying phantom at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoldieAZ49 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
19. I didn't know you were against democracy and allow all to cast a vote
interesting change some 'democrats' have taken

In the GE if after 3/4 of the states vote and McCain is in the lead, I guess you will be ok with the rest of the states not getting to vote, just call it for McCain.

Interesting position you have.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. They will still get to vote.
But we will have stopped the bleeding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Voltaire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #19
25. Had she been in the lead after WI
would she be as interested in counting all the votes? I think NOT. And if you are honest with yourself you know that too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoldieAZ49 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #25
35. same thing, regardless of the candidate
It isn't over until all votes are cast.

It is neither candidates fault that they are so close but the fault of the voters that there wasn't one candidate they would all vote for.

Democracy isn't always easy but it should not be stopped.

The winner should have the lead after all votes are cast, regardless of which candidate it is. It will go a long way to start to bridge the divide in the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #25
37. she didn't expect any vote to count after Super-Tuesday
and really, neither did I. I expected she would have the nomination won after that day. In 1992, for example, Bill Clinton wrapped up the nomination pretty quick and the remaining states just pretty much rubber-stamped the inevitable. Same as 1996. Same as 2000, and the same as 2004.

In fact, this year was not much different, since Dodd and Biden quit after Iowa, Richardson quit after New Hampshire, Edwards quit after Florida and Gravel and Kucinich never had a chance anyway. By the time super-Tuesday came around, there was not much "choice" left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
End Of The Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
23. I love 'em both and hope they stay around for a long time. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
24. indulged = double standard
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #24
27. show me an example please
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #27
31. If Hillary Clinton had
a lead

in the popular vote
in the delegates
in endorsements by senators
in endorsements by govenors
in money raised
in the number of donors
in the number of primaries won
in the number of caucuses won


and had conceded that going into the national convention would still have all of those categories intact the opposing candidate

would have been forced from the field.


Also no other candidate would be allowed to have their surrogates run free 'branding' other candidates as Judas.

Only Hillary Clinton is allowed to play into overtime when the democratic will of the pledged delegates has been well established.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. that's the "so-called" pledged delegates, grant
the goal posts have been moved again, try to keep up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #31
46. in your mind


nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RememberWellstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
28. Make them
Oompas telling Clintons to get off the stage? Make them, Braveheart, go ahead.:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
29. I'm sure she's just been waiting for your decision.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wowimthere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
30. K&R Please, PLEASE! Retire the side!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
32. Amen, hit the road, chumps. The whole world is on to your DLC neoliberal bullshit.
The best they can hope for now is to be buried in secret so their graves won't be defiled.

DLC delende est.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rubiconski2009 Donating Member (212 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
34. Find them a white house trailer in Arkansas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
36. This thread got 17 recs?
Who the hell recommends a thread with no content?

Seriously, folks, what's the point of posting bihourly calls for Hillary to drop out? She's not going to, at least not before Pennsylvania. All you're doing is pissing her supporters off and creating ill will towards Obama. We need their support in the fall, so stop with this crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. Are you the thread police?
Your concern is entirely sincere, I'm sure. As far as I know...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDeathadder Donating Member (731 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
41. get off your high horse
only half of you have had enough, the other half want more Clinton. It's not Clinton get off the stage...it's get out of Clinton's way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
42. As someone once said...
"you ain't gotta go home but you can't stay here."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #42
48. Here's your hat, what's your hurry?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knight_of_the_star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
43. Epic Fail
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crankychatter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
44. the truth isn't diminished by repetition
you go girl

k n r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
45. Indulged is the right word - and when beloved children become nasty little brats...
Edited on Thu Mar-27-08 04:02 PM by polichick
...it's time to stop indulging. (Or when beloved relatives become nasty self-serving cranks.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC