|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Bullet1987 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 09:20 AM Original message |
Do You Think the Clinton's Would Endorse Obama Right Away? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillYourVoteBCounted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 09:21 AM Response to Original message |
1. they're endorsing McCain n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
monmouth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 09:23 AM Response to Original message |
2. After this is over and HillBill go home, their marketability will be in a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 09:25 AM Response to Original message |
3. Yes -- if nothing else, I think that'll be part of any "brokering" that goes on. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UALRBSofL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 09:27 AM Response to Original message |
4. Are you kidding, I hope so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bullet1987 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 10:09 AM Response to Reply #4 |
25. I don't expect them to be out on the campaign trail...not for Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pbca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 09:30 AM Response to Original message |
5. No They're republicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 09:32 AM Response to Reply #5 |
9. So, you were in a coma during the '90s then? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buzz Clik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 09:32 AM Response to Reply #5 |
10. snicker. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UALRBSofL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 09:38 AM Response to Reply #5 |
14. You should know better then that, they are not republicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NeedleCast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 09:40 AM Original message |
Rebulicans would never nominated Hil.lary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NeedleCast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 09:40 AM Response to Reply #5 |
18. Rebulicans would never nominated Hil.lary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pbca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 10:08 AM Response to Reply #18 |
24. They currently |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 09:31 AM Response to Original message |
6. FYI: no apostrophe in "Clintons." nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buzz Clik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 09:35 AM Response to Reply #6 |
12. FYI: Anyone correcting grammar or punctuation on the Internet is behaving badly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 09:43 AM Response to Reply #12 |
19. Don't care. It's a basic rule of this language and you ought to know it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buzz Clik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 09:50 AM Response to Reply #19 |
21. I know my grammar; you weren't correcting me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UALRBSofL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 09:48 AM Response to Reply #12 |
20. Buzz Clik you tell them, good for you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LakeSamish706 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 09:32 AM Response to Original message |
7. There ain't no way in hell the Clinton's are endorsing Obama. IMO.. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uberblonde (993 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 09:32 AM Response to Original message |
8. Welcome to the Department of Pre-Crime. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 09:33 AM Response to Original message |
11. Do You Think "the Obama's" Would Endorse Clinton Right Away? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peace13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 09:54 AM Response to Reply #11 |
22. Unfortunately spell check prefers that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bullet1987 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 10:11 AM Response to Reply #11 |
26. Actually, I do think Obama would endorse her right away |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 09:36 AM Response to Original message |
13. She already endorsed McCain |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 09:39 AM Response to Original message |
15. yes. No matter how it ends up, there will be a big show of unity at the end of the convention. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buzz Clik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 09:40 AM Response to Original message |
16. A clue: did you happen to catch Bill talking about the Obama's campaign sensitivity to criticism? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lisa58 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 09:40 AM Response to Original message |
17. conceding usually includes an endorsement of the winner |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UALRBSofL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 09:57 AM Response to Reply #17 |
23. lisa58 Hillary wont campaign for Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 10:13 AM Response to Original message |
27. I have this horrible feeling the Clintons will endorse McCain |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bullet1987 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 10:22 AM Response to Reply #27 |
28. If they openly endorsed McCain...then it would be the end for them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 10:33 AM Response to Reply #28 |
29. Agreed. But there's always the Joe Lieberman model |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uberblonde (993 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 08:10 PM Response to Reply #27 |
31. Ooo, there's that mind-reading trick again! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 10:34 AM Response to Original message |
30. yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidpdx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 08:23 PM Response to Original message |
32. My take is that the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:30 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC