Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton Risks Credibility Gap Over `Fudged' Claims, Stances (Bloomberg News)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
swag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 07:36 AM
Original message
Clinton Risks Credibility Gap Over `Fudged' Claims, Stances (Bloomberg News)
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aN1m3Y9LByD4&refer=home

March 28 (Bloomberg) -- Hillary Clinton, accused of exaggerating her experience and reversing policy positions, risks a widening credibility gap that may undermine her bid for the Democratic presidential nomination.

The New York senator, who this week admitted to misrepresenting the danger she confronted in Bosnia, also has come under fire for allegedly distorting her role in opposing free trade and the war in Iraq, and overstating her involvement in bringing peace to Northern Ireland and health insurance to children.

The debate over these and other statements is fueling distrust among voters, according to analysts and recent polls. A Pew Research survey released yesterday showed 30 percent of white Democrats -- a group Clinton needs in order to win the remaining primaries -- regard her as a ``phony,'' twice as many as those who perceive rival Barack Obama that way. In late February, just 7.8 percent of voters surveyed by Pew described her as ``untrustworthy.''

``She's either fudged her positions or been downright disingenuous,'' said Dan Gerstein, a Democratic strategist who isn't working for any candidate. ``Any one'' episode ``wouldn't hurt her, but the accumulated weight has turned Democratic voters against her.''

. . .

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. Latest Gallup O-48(+1), C-44(-2),
The sniper lies are affecting the latest polls.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Encouraged by the RW media of course
get rid of HIllary, make Obama bleed and unfit for the presidency, they win.......divide and conquer works every time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 07:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. HRC's buddies Murdoch and Scaife.
Cheeses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GarbagemanLB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. the same media that played Wright 24/7....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:00 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. and will continue to do so once he wins the nomination
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Window Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #2
14. Yes. Of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BumRushDaShow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
4. Now if the M$M would only do their job and start vetting Clinton
rather than spend 24/7 on a retired pastor. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. They don't have to now
It's over for Clinton. They know it. Now they have all the good stuff they've been saving for Obama. The plan worked and we fell for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 07:52 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. It was over with me for Clinton when she started praising McCain over Obama.
Actually, it was over for me with her when she voted for that war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Of course, that was the plan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Quite an all-engulfing conspiracy theory you've got going there.
Please do lay it all out for us beclouded fools.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. You don't think Rove is involved in all of this?
I am not going to waste time trying to explain all of this, just think back to yourself when Rove supposedly "quit" the White House. What do you think the slime bag was doing? Just ask yourself a few questions about how the slime machine works, connect a few dots and you will figure out some things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. I don't think the keeper of "The Math" could organize a trip to the toilet.
The Clinton campaign is sinking under the weight of its own ineptitude and mendacity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
islandmkl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. you don't think they have ANY stuff lying around for Hillary?...
jesus, they've been saving up to blow up Hillary for the past 8 years...

she is the RW wetdream...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. You don't get it do you?
They have been going after Hillary for 20 years. They don't have anything new. It's done. Obama is a gift to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Window Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. Oh, please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #9
17. I'm pretty sure they have stuff on her and Bill since 2000. Please
don't be that naive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC