Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WTF - she won't even call it a "recession"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 01:06 PM
Original message
WTF - she won't even call it a "recession"
Well so much for that standing up to the right wing bullshit. they've probably analyzed the crap out of it and figured out that they might piss off some crossover voters if they call it a recession. so they once again fudge an answer.

Check the link:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/03/27/obama-uses-the-r-word-_n_93798.html

Is there really any hope when you can't even give a straight answer to a question like "are we in a recession"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. She's a true corporate democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. growth needs to drop instead of being stagnant - 0.4% drop is still required
Edited on Fri Mar-28-08 01:09 PM by dmordue
to call it a recession (technically). Boy that 0.4% makes me feel more secure
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Isn't A Recession Two Consecutive Quarters Of Negative Economic Growth?
~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Yes, that's the working definition
But bear in mind that that's by nature a retroactive statistic, as well as pretty narrow definition. I think the only reason we're not 'formally' in recession is because the writedown of lost financial assets is being stretched out as long as possible to spread the pain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Where do you get that from?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. Suppose she did call it a "Recession"?
Then, Team Obama would be claiming that she lacks faith in America and is trying to discourage the working "folks".

They'd also hammer her on her math with that 0.4% deal. They would scream that she was deliberately lying.

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. I don't think that's realistic.
Faith in America is not analogous to ignoring the failing economy.

That 0.4% deal... where is it from?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Obama has already said we are probably in a recession. /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Um, Obama would have a hard time saying that
since he did have the guts to call it a recession.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. Facts never stopped them before.
Team Obama has mastered the art of the Double Standard like no political campaign in history. If it's ironic, Excelon nuclear lobbyist David Axelrod has turned it into a campaign technique.

And it works, extremely well. People really DO think that James Carville speaks for Hillary, but linking Obama to Rev. Wright is an unfair guilt-by-association Hillary trick.

Besides, what are they going to do when it turns out that Stein was wrong, and "misspoke" about Hillary? This weekend, while they are anxiously poring over news footage looking for more "Gotchas!" on Hillary, if they come across footage of her talking about the recession, I'm sure they'll inform the world of their error.

They'll run it right after Keith's Special Comment on the "Garlic Nose" crack.

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. no, pigwig, you're confused
That's team hilly who's full of crap and lying shit. What can you expect from Wolfson and Pig Penn?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Wow, you people really are desperate to deflect attention away from your candidate.
I don't blame you. Every time she talks her numbers go down.

Of course the deflection strategy isn't good for you either, because whenever Obama talks, his numbers go up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. "You people" -- ?
Here's the stock response whenever a HRC supporter uses that phrase:

1. RACIST!

2. :rofl:

Here's my stock response to the predictions of Hillary's impending doom:

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/us/democratic_presidential_nomination-191.html">RCP daily tracking graph

Obama now has a commanding 3.6% lead. (Metastudies like RCP's don't usually include a MOE, but it's probably around 3-5%.)

I wonder what will happen when RCP hears from the "garlic noses"?

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. If the Clinton supporters could look at themselves from outside, even for a moment...
You'd realize that everyone else can see that the Clinton campaign is circling the drain. The Dem leadership can see it, the uncommitted voters can see it, and the pundits can see it. It's over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thoughtcrime1984 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. He not only said we are in a recession, but gave his plan to help us out of it.
Did you watch his speech yesterday?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
6. There's reality and there's Hillary and her supporters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeadElephant_ORG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
11. "leave the technical definitions of the recession to the experts." YUK !! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
15. Because it isn't technically a recession, although I'm betting it soon will be
"Recession" is a very real econ term, and the current economic downturn hasn't reached the required % yet. As Is aid, I'm betting it will happen soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Where is this "required %" stuff from?
Why won't anyone explain where that's coming from?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. What do you mean "where's it from?
It's an economic term. To be a recession, it has to meet certain criteria, just like a storm isn't a hurricane unless it meets certain criteria. I've been in Spring storms with higher mph winds than some hurricanes I've sat through (and there have been alot!), but they weren't hurricanes.

As I said, I'm betting we'll officially have a recession by Summer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Yes. I know it's an economic term. I haven't seen this "it has to be such and such a percentage"
stuff before.

Where is it from?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Here
In macroeconomics, a recession is a decline in a country's gross domestic product (GDP), or negative real economic growth, for two or more successive quarters of a year.

In US, the judgment of the business-cycle dating committee of the National Bureau of Economic Research regarding the exact dating of recessions is generally accepted. The NBER has a more general framework for judging recessions:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recession
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. There is nothing in there about specific percentages...
Edited on Fri Mar-28-08 02:11 PM by redqueen
just negative GDP growth for two quarters in a row.

I'm still curious as to where the specific numbers came from.

I guess you at least have shown that it didn't come from Wikipedia. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewHampshireDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
21. She won't say 'recession' because it sounds too much like 'concession'
and she'll have gotten our hopes up for nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
23. This is Mark Penn at work.
Edited on Fri Mar-28-08 02:04 PM by NJSecularist
He probably identified a 1% subset of the Democratic primary population who is offended by the word recession - and they are pnadering to that demographic for votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 03:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC