Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

can anyone explain why the convention is in late August? seems really late...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
darue Donating Member (383 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 02:23 PM
Original message
can anyone explain why the convention is in late August? seems really late...
that seems extraordinarily late, just about 9 weeks before the general election? Maybe it's a good strategy, I'm not sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. Seems late to me
Typically, they are in June-July.

But I hope that's just a function of convention hall availability.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. Because 4 years ago Repukes decided to Exploit 9/11 and moved it to later
for some states you have to be on the Ballot by September 1st. Since the republicans were having their convention in New York City they wanted to milk it for all it was worth. We had fun protesting that convention!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. So the election "season" would be short
plus the Olympics delayed it too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Actually it is because of the Olympics
They couldn't get tv coverage if it was held during the Games. At least not from NBC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. Last election we held it a month earlier and we got burned.
Kerry accepted public financing (an $85 million dollar limit)... as did George W Bush. The difference is that they used their $85 million over an 8 week period (their convention was held 5 weeks later than ours) while we had to use that $85 million over a 13 week period.

Obviously it's much harder to be able to use $85 million over a 13 week period than it is an 8 week period.

That is why the convention is so late. If our candidate accepts public financing, we can use our $85 million over a shorter time period. That benefits us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Saint in the City Donating Member (10 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Has something to do with Public Campaign Finance rules notext
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Yep - Terry McAuliffe set up 2004 Dem convention 6 Weeks BEFORE the GOP convention
Edited on Fri Mar-28-08 03:05 PM by blm
which was part of McAuliffe's "I don't care about 2004' strategy in order to protect Hillary2008.

Hey Terry - Was it worth it to TeamClinton to undermine 2000, 2002 and 2004 elections to keep Bush in power till Hillary could take over?

How has that subterfuge worked out for all y'all, anyway?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. The incumbent party always goes last
And did McAuliffe set this date? Wasn't he long gone when this happened?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. True
the party that's "out" always goes first. It's supposed to even things out and give them a slight advantage to campaign longer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. I know - but not with 6 weeks in between. McAuliffe set up the 2004 convention
including the date. He left in Feb 2005. Dean set up this convention, including the date.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. I'm sorry, I thought your earlier post said he set up the '08 convention
I wasn't reading carefully enough. Missed the 2004 date in there.

Thanks. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. I added it when I realized you thought I was talking about 2008.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
6. The best part of it..... August 28th, the night Obama gives acceptance speech... is the 45th....
...anniversary of Dr. King's "I Have a Dream" speech.


Gives me chills thinking about how much that place will be rocking that night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. WOW!
That is so COOL!!! :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
darue Donating Member (383 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. thanks for the clarity, makes sense to me now.,,
if only the admiral's son were running against two candidates instead of them running against each other. Hopefully that'll clear up soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
13. In '04, the Dems fucked themselves by holding it way early.
Edited on Fri Mar-28-08 03:00 PM by Drunken Irishman
Typically a candidate gets a bounce out of the convention and sure enough, Kerry saw a bounce, but it vanished by the time September rolled around and the Republicans held theirs. Bush then got a bounce, in fact led by 10-15 points until October, when the debates started and Kerry gained ground. It was a horrible mistake by the Democrats to hold it so early that year. Having it in August is actually pretty good, since it will give Obama a nice bounce -- especially with it being so historical (he'll be giving his acceptance speech 45 years to the day MLK gave his I Have a Dream Speech).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. You assume the Dem party then was working for a win in 2004. Nope. TeamClinton ran the DNC
from 1993-Feb2005, and no doubt they ran that party to only serve the goals of Hillary2008. After 2000s massive election fraud, McAuliffe found no need to secure the election process in states where the party had been long collapsed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
17. Because the candidate gets the same amount of money in public financing...
...regardless of how many months are left until November.

In 2004, Kerry had to spread that money over 3 months and Bush over 2 months.

This year, the candidates will each have about 2 months to spend the public financing (if Obama takes public financing.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 27th 2024, 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC