Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Shenanigans at the obama campaign...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 07:48 PM
Original message
Shenanigans at the obama campaign...
Edited on Fri Mar-28-08 07:50 PM by TankLV
I attended the Nevada Democratic Party Caucuses in January here in Henderson, Nevada.

My partner could not attend because he was away in Tennesee at the birth of his granddaughter at the time.

We just noticed that the obama campaign is sending him emails thanking him for "voting for obama in the caucuses"!

What the hell are these people doing?!?!

We are currently endeavoring to contact the Hillary Campaign and the local Democratic Party and State Elections officials to officially register our complaints and fill out any affidavits, etc.

This is a PERSONAL example of the corruption of the obama campaign - and I wonder how wide spread this is!

People should be aware of this!!!

I was not planning on attending the upcomming April State convention, but now this is all changed...

THIS CORRUPTION BY THE OBAMA CAMPAIGN HAS GOT TO STOP - NOW!

How many other victums are there of his corruption?!?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. I don't really think that is corruption. Could just be a mistake on the email list..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Yeah - just another "mistake" on obama's part!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. Um, you already had your caucuses, right?
Just trying to figure out why you're outraged. Is your partner a delegate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #17
37. Did you read my OP - HE WAS NOT THERE...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krawhitham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #37
101. That's what he told you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #17
39. The caucus is the first stage
Delegates are elected on the precinct level. Tomorrow they will be elected at the county level. Then comes the state level delegate election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #39
63. Yep, that's what we do here in Colorado. But...
If the guy is NOT an Obama delegate, then he doesn't go to the convention and vote for Obama. Simple. I get those emails, too. I am an Obama supporter, in fact a precinct captain, but I am not one of the Obama delegates from my precinct. I have gotten several emails from teh Obama campaign reminding me of the convention place nad time and that if I'm a delegate to be sure to go and thanks for my support, yada yada yada.
And for this guy to say (below) that votes are public record is just hogwash. The state knows who voted but they have no idea who voted for whom. Obama has no idea who voted, much less who voted for whom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. Did you look at the headers?
What was the originating email address?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. It's from the obama campaign headquarters...
and no, obamabots - this is HAPPENING - NOW...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. yes, you say that
But what is the return email address? The originating one? Do you know how to look for it in the headers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #11
23. We are checking into it now - he got the emails, not me...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. Well, in case you need help
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. have you been drinking?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
29. Really good question....
especially now that he's added other stuff to his story. That fish keeps getting bigger and smellier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
43. nice try - I expect as much from you...
and the answer is NO...

idiot...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #43
92. idiot? jeez. by the by, I get shit all the time from people I never
heard of because they have my name in a list some place. I don't split a gut over it. I delete it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
5. Maybe it was a single clerical error.
"This is a PERSONAL example of the corruption of the obama campaign" - how can you say that with 100% certainty?

If they were so corrupt, do you think they would send out an e-mail broadcasting the "shenanigan" ?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Nope - he's gotten a few emails on this now...
we just happened to notice it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. You did not undersatnd the question.
If they were really corrupt, then they would know that people who did not vote would get upset being sent e-mails thanking them for voting - just as you are.

Thus they would not send - if they were corrupt - e-mails to highlight the corruptness.

Thus I can only conclude that this is a clerical error.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #13
41. umm - nice try - they stated that he was a SUPPORTER and a DELEGATE...
when that is impossible...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #41
80. Politicians send out appreciate mail all the time, hoping to get voters' support.
Obama doesn't know whether your partner is his delegate or not. He's sending everyone whose name was signed up for the caucus these emails, hoping to sway the decisions of undecideds. That's not corruption. That's a tactic as old as junk mail.

All politicians do this. Nobody has stolen your partner's vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
8. What corruption?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. It dovetails nicely with my personal experience at the caucuses...
we disbanded without voting on or being able to select any delegates - and Hillary won our caucuses...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #15
24. back up
You didn't select any delegates?

Why not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #24
47. The caucus ended and disbanded without our group doing any voting on delegates, etc.
It was run by people who didn't seem to know what to do - I was there as a participant...

It was total confusion...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #47
55. Well, that sucks
Do you live in a large precinct?

Do you need help with those headers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #55
60. Yes - it's a relatively large precinct - but it there were a total of a few hundred in our precinct
that showed-up to vote.

we also ran out of "ballots"...

I posted my account back in January...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa0825 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
9. Similar emails have come from the Hillary camp in Texas
I know 2 people ini my own county who voted for Obama and are delegates who got emails from Hillary thanking her for being a Hillary delegate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. Sorry - this is about obama - and a PERSONAL example of his camgain's CHEATING...
I'm not aware of any such thing on Hillary's campaign part...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #20
34. How is it cheating?
Edited on Fri Mar-28-08 08:10 PM by tammywammy
Didn't you already have your caucus? If you husband isn't even a delegate isn't it possible it's just a mistake? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #34
50. NO - we already did have our caucus - back in January - he was not there - I was...
therefore he could NOT be a delegate...

He is right across from me about two feet away from me - he is NOT a delegate...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #50
57. So, how is it cheating then?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #50
93. why don't you copy and paste the emails so we can see n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa0825 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #20
53. My POINT is that it's possible that they just pulled Democrats' emails
from various sources and sent the notices out, or that cross-checking them didn't go well, or their database had errors. There are plenty of plausible explanations, and I didn't hit the fucking roof when I heard about Hillary's misdirected emails.

BTW, you're rude. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #20
75. Both campaigns received INACCURATE spreadsheets from the Texas Dems
Guess What? Obama Is Not 'Poaching' Delegates in Texas

snip

According to spokesman Hector Nieto of the Texas Democratic Party, "the information that we gave to the campaigns was information given to us by the individual precincts. We then sent that information to a contractor to key it in to a spreadsheet. There's a possibility that an error was made when the information was keyed in." In other words, the precincts reported the correct candidate affiliations to the state party, but an outside contractor likely screwed up when entering those affiliations into a single spreadsheet --meaning that the Clinton and Obama campaigns received lists that incorrectly displayed at least a few Clinton delegates pledged to Obama (and perhaps vice versa).



Read the whole thing

http://www.blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/03/28/guess-what-obama-is-not-poaching-delegates-in-texas.aspx

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Medusa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
10. I get emails from the MCCain campaign all the time
thanking me for my support. I've never voted for him. How did he get my email? I think from my GOP Senator. I'm on his mailing list and I bet that's how the McCain campaign got it. Just saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
12. I don't get it
It sounds like they assumed everyone participated and sent thank you's. What's the big deal? How is this corrupt?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. They have him listed as a DELEGATE for obama...
this is serious...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. LOL!
Obama's campaign has no idea WHO the delegates are. Nice try.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. It's part of the public record - there are sign-in sheets, etc...
nice try my ass...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #25
44. LOL again. And nice try but no cigar. Sheesh. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #44
52. You don't know what your talkling about - nice try...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #25
77. If he wasn't there to caucus
Then how would his email be on the sign-in sheet? Did you list his email?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #77
83. That's why I know this is bogus.
Who votes for whom is not public record. The Obama campaign doesn't even know that I'm NOT a delegate from my precinct even though I was precinct captain. I get emails all the time reminding me of our convention date and time and to be sure to go IF I'm a delegate. Oh yeah, and they thank me for my support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #16
96. If so, then he can just contact them and tell them they are incorrect.
What's so difficult about that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
14. You could be overreacting just a teensy bit.
It seems more like a simple mistake than a nefarious plot. In fact, if it is a nefarious plot, I can't figure out the point of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. umm - hardball CHEATING by the obama campaign?!?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #18
28. Just a boneheaded mistake
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #28
35. seem so to be alot of them from obama...doen't it?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #35
94. they wouldn't cheat like that because it would stimulate you to turn out against him
when i've worked on campaigns before, people who support the opponent are not contacted again because it encourages them to vote against their opponent.

and the cheating thing, you are going to have to provide more information/evidence of cheating to convince anybody but yourself here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #18
31. Are you and your partner going to forget you caucused for Clinton or something?
I fail to see how sending out a piece of mail thanking you for supporting Obama is going to do that. I don't see how this is hardball cheating. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DUyellow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #31
38. We can only wish ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #18
40. Obviously I'm missing the point. How is an erroneous email suggestive of cheating?
Are you suggesting that Obama somehow stole your partner's vote, even though your partner didn't even attend the caucus? You think that Obama stole the nonexistent vote and then thanked him for it?

George W. Bush stole votes in 2000 and 2004, but I didn't get an email from him thanking me for my vote. If he stole my vote (could have - I know he stole Ohioans' votes, and probably some other states' as well) he certainly wasn't going to notify me about it!

I think your partner received either an erroneous email, or possibly a "push-poll" type of message, along the lines of, "Maybe if we send out millions of emails thanking people for their votes they'll decide to vote for Obama."

Sort of like those letters we get in the mail containing a plea for money and customized address labels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
19. !
:tinfoilhat: :popcorn: :beer:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
22. Ummm...so what?
It's called advertising.

A company (or campaign) buys a list from a company. Ideally, that list is as represented (pregnant women, Harley-Davidson owners, Obama voters, whatever). The company (or campaign) that bought the list solicits the people on that list.

Somehow, your partner wound up on an Obama voter list. I doesn't mean his vote was misrecorded. It doesn't indicate a sinister plot. For some reason, he wound up on some list.

Why in hell would this shake you up so?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #22
32. It disturbes us because it's now comming down to crunch time...
and goes to the integrity of our voting process...

obviously, corruption on obama's part doesn't "shake you up", does it?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #32
82. I don't see the "corruption". Are you sugesting that you actually believe the vote was miscounted?
Edited on Fri Mar-28-08 08:32 PM by MercutioATC
Isn't it much more reasonable to assume that this is just what always happens...mailings are made from a purchased mailing list?

Even if here WAS voter fraud involved, how does the Obama campaign have anything to do with it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #32
95. is this the argument that the caucuses are corrupted and we should only count primaries?
i'm hearing your complaint right as Bill Clinton and others in the Hillary campaign are making this argument in what appears to be a very coordinated way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:02 PM
Original message
The sky is falling!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nitrogenica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
27. What kind of corruption is this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KAZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
30. Moran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. Nice - from a typical obamabot...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #33
54. It might have something to do with the fact that delegates can shift
their votes.

I didn't stay at my caucus either to vote for delegates. I think they go through a few meetings on their way up to the final talley.

It is possible that the Obama people are getting themselves elected to the delegate positions in order to invalidate Hillary's talley.

The delegates in Florida in 2000 were planning on doing that no matter what happened, i.e. they were going to throw it to Bush.

Apparently it's legal, while being underhanded at the same time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mooney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
36. Yup, there's no way that's a clerical fuckup. It can only be malfeasance.
God knows, I have never in my life received an e-mail in error. This incredibly rare anamoly which you and your loved ones have suffered is proof positive that Saddam Hitler Osama is thuggishly trying to MUG you for the presidency!

God help us all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #36
97. Oh and the email about Obama being a Muslim, that one's correct (of course)
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
42. Zoloft is your friend.
Seriously dude, take it down a notch - your foil hat is doing some serious circulatory damage. It's a friggen email, that could have come from anywhere. As a PP mentioned, your partner was probably on a mailing list. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
45. Chamomile tea. Really, have a cup. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knight_of_the_star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
46. Epic Fail
Go take a time-out

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
48. As A Former Delegate in 04
I got calls and e-mails from all candidates, even ones I wasn't supporting. As hectic as the caucuses were this year, I'm not surprised your e-mail got on a Obama list.

Calm down, there's no corruption going on!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
49. I've decided that this is one of the top five funniest threads I've ever read.
Sorry Tank. I love ya, dude, and I'm not making fun of you, but this....

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #49
56. Good for you - it's serious to us...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #56
59. Please explain what you think is happening. I don't understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #59
61. Read by OP and responses above...
This is disturbing to say the least...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #61
62. I've got to get back to doing "work" (my job) now - I will post back what our results are...
see you all later...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #59
72. They sent their partner an email thanking them for voting, but they didn't vote.
Pretty damn simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #72
76. I got that part. How is that cheating? Why is that corruption?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #72
102. your candidate was too busy sending "Obama's a Muslim" emails or they would've thanked them
oh well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
51. Obama was accused of "delegate poaching" in Texas too, but it's been debunked.
Sounds like what happened to you might be the fault of your state party, and not Obama's campaign.

Newsweek: Guess What? Obama is not 'Poaching' Delegates in Texas

On Wednesday, I delivered what I believed to be bad news for Obamaniacs: that their man, like his rival Hillary Clinton, was passively attempting to poach county caucus delegates. Earlier, I had reported that Iowa county delegates pledged to Obama were receiving robocalls from the Clinton campaign in the run-up to the coming county conventions (when such delegates can switch their allegiances). Now, I wrote, at least one Clinton delegate in Texas had received a postcard from the Obama campaign urging him to "Support Barack Obama at your county convention!" (which takes place this Saturday). "That means that both Obama and Clinton are, in effect, asking their rival's delegates for support," I added. "If neither Obama nor Clinton clinches the nomination by the end of primary season in June, they'll be forced to spend the summer jockeying for any possible advantage--and this is exactly the sort of passive, gray-area poaching that you can expect to see."

But that wasn't the whole story.

While the Clinton camp was heartened by the report--which essentially allowed them to say that if they were wrong to poach, so was Obama--Team Obama was not. Obama spokesman Bill Burton quickly contacted me to say that the postcard in question was mistakenly sent to a Clinton delegate--not, as I previously believed, to the entire list of Texas county delegates, regardless of affiliation. "The Texas Democratic Party gave us a list of delegates that indicated him as an Obama delegate--which is why he got the errant post card," he says. "The suggestion that we have a passive strategy of trying to flip Clinton's pledged delegates by sending one postcard to one guy is pretty ludicrous on its face."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #51
58. All I can do is relate what is happening to US - NOW...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #58
64. Understood, but this also happened only a few days ago, to a Texas delegate.
I wouldn't jump to conclusions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
65. Did they also ask him to share his bank account information so that they
could reward him with $10,000,000 from a Nigerian account?

Seriously -- Spam email is a HUGE 'industry' for phishing, scamming and trojans. Don't take what you are seeing at face value.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #65
69. Yael, maybe you can help me
Edited on Fri Mar-28-08 08:25 PM by tammywammy
I just don't see why Tank would call this cheating? Am I just not understanding it. Her partner did not caucus. Is not a delegate. He got an email saying "thanks for caucusing for us and being an Obama delegate," but he's not. Obviously it's a mistake email. But I don't see where it's cheating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #69
87. What I am thinking is this
Edited on Fri Mar-28-08 08:44 PM by Yael
You know how when you get an email, your email client asks you if you want to download images from <sender>?

That is because something as seemingly innocent as an image sent through email can be a problem. It can report back to the sender your IP (physical address) as well as the operating system you are using and how you are connected to the internet.

Have you ever gotten an email that said something like "News on Brittney" or "Nude Paris photos"?

If you open them, they probably won't even reference Brittney, Paris or anything. More likely links for Phentermine from Canada or something.

If I were in the phishing business, here is what I would do (mods, please remove if TMI):

Send out emails masked to "come from" obama@barackobama.com. Title them something like "Thanks for voting for Barack". In the body of the email, have a link masked (like click here for your thank you prize instead of exposed like http://www.fakelink.com ) and redirect the computer to fakelink.com where a trojan is waiting to download itself so that I can play script kiddie games by using Tank's BF's computer to launch DDOS attacks against my rivals in the hacker world.

Less invasive (and much more common) is to redirect the computer to a site that generates ad revenue to the spammer.

By masking the 'from' email -- one will have to go into the headers to see where it REALLY came from. Few know how to do that (although the link is posted above). By masking the link -- that leads people to click out of curiosity.

Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton are the new "Brittney and Paris" for this crap.

If Tank wants to send me the headers on the email -- I can take a look and let him know what I see. Forwarding it won't work as the headers will be replaced with his own. Tank -- PM me if you want some help with that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #87
88. Ahh, that would make sense
And luckily I don't get those crap emails. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #88
103. Tank still hasn't shown us any of these emails
just sayin'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
66. One last thing - no matter what happens - we have decided to support the nominee when they are
finally chosen...

this is a big change on our part...

we cannot let the repukes win in November...

no matter how much I don't like obama...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #66
73. That's wonderful!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Growler Donating Member (896 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
67. Drink much??
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
68. This is corruption?
Why don't you take your delicate sensibilities and attack some real corruption, like the in the neo-con Bush administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasLady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
70. I once sent a bitch out letter to John Carter
here in Texas, right after Katrina. I still get the occasional vomitous email from them.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #70
79. That happens to me, too. I still get appreciative mail from Elizabeth Dole.
Believe me, the letters I sent her were not complimentary. According to her, though, I'm her biggest pal. Go figure.

I think that politicians blanket the country with emails and letters thanking people right and left, in the hope that a small percentage will actually be impressed and decide to support said candidate.

Exactly the same way that spam emails and junk mail works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knixphan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
71. I'm confused - still trying to find the corruption
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
74. Mountain meet molehill. You can't be serious. A botched address on a mailing list does not a
scandal make. No matter how much you wish it to be so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
78. victims!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
81. This thread is hilarious
Edited on Fri Mar-28-08 08:33 PM by Catherina
:rofl:


Please relax and don't set Hillary up for CaucusGate. She's been embarrassed enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #81
84. it is funny. Unintentionally. Let's nominate it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #84
85. Done. I haven't laughed so hard since I've been here n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #84
89. Ok, I'm in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoof Hearted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
86. His caucus shenanigans are finally starting to come out in the open
He's run a disgusting, crooked campaign.

Good luck to you and your partner, I hope you get to the bottom of all this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #86
90. .
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #86
98. Really? Really?
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murielm99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
91. Read this thread tank.
Pay attention to post #5 and #27.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=132&topic_id=4883640

This has been going on all over the country. Clinton supporters are not allowed to speak or vote. Caucuses are being packed by Obama supporters who may not even be there legally. In some places, no ID or voter registrations are checked, and the Obamites know it.

There is widespread cheating by the Obama people at caucuses all over the country. I can't prove it, but I have had family and friends tell me this.

The media knows and they are giving Obama a pass. Maybe they are saving it to use for later.

Any DUer who has had a negative caucus experience because of the Obama supporters should let you know, Tank. There may be no way to stop it or prove it, but I think the truth should be out there.

Want to flame me Obamites? Bring it on. I don't care for cheaters, no matter what side they are on.

And after all the things you have said about Clinton without any basis, don't ask me to prove it. You haven't proven your allegations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #91
104. invalidate the caucuses?
is that what ya want? that would even up the score between Obama and Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murielm99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #104
106. I think every DUer who has experienced something
questionable by Obama supporters at a caucus should document it. I wish some of them would post in this thread, too.

Invalidate the caucuses? I am beginning to think they were never valid to begin with. Obama found a way to game the system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
99. Is your candidate's campaign underhanded?
Second Clinton Volunteer Resigns Over Obama Muslim Email

Associated Press | Nedra Pickler | December 10, 2007 08:45 AM
Second Clinton Volunteer Resigns Over Obama Muslim Email

Hillary Rodham Clinton's campaign on Sunday requested the resignation of a second Iowa volunteer coordinator who forwarded a hoax e-mail saying Barack Obama is a Muslim possibly intent on destroying the United States.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2007/12/10/second-clinton-volunteer-_n_76047.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
100. I attended the Iowa Caucuses and left as 'uncommitted'
I attended my county convention as an Edwards alternate
I will be attending my district convention as an Obama alternate

and yet

I KEEP GETTING EMAILS FROM THE CLINTON CAMPAIGN THANKING ME FOR MY SUPPORT!!

This must STOP! I never gave her money, I never signed a pledge card and I didn't caucus for her!

BUT...I did attend an event which is where the campaign got my email address :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
highprincipleswork Donating Member (163 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
105. Clarity would be good
Seems clear to me that neither candidate or their campaigns is sure which delegates are for which candidate. What they do have is lists of all the delegates that were selected. That is who they are contacting.

No corruption in that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC