Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

a question for each side ...and i am, for sure ,serious

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
SwampG8r Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 11:08 PM
Original message
a question for each side ...and i am, for sure ,serious
i want to know what would be considered a "win"
by the clinton and the obama camps in pa.
she was up once i believe by 30 points,
now i think its in the low teens.
i have no citations for these numbers.

from obama supporters, and ,i am one myself,since it seems we will not win the vote itself,
what will be considered a "win" ?

and from clinton supporters,
since all polling says she will win pa,
what percentage point spread will make you feel she has rebuilt some momentum?

this isnt flame bait, so if all you can add to the discussion is "uh uh no way---uh huh yes way"
then please, go elsewhere.

as i said i am supporting obama but i know ,because i have actully encountered them,some democrats here are working for hillary. your ideas are still important and so is your input.
i am a floridian and i feel if we en up at the convention withoua nominee ,then so be it.
but....
i also dont want to see the '68 or '72 elections relived.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kirby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. My understanding...
is that Sen Clinton would have to get something 65-70% in ALL of the remaining states to break even with Sen Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SwampG8r Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. only talkin pa. one day at atime my friend lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kirby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. My friend?
Is that you McCain? You up late doing research with the google?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SwampG8r Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
25. mc cain is your friend? nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kirby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #25
33. You dont get the joke?
McCain always starts his sentences with 'My friend'. He uses in the same sentence that tells you to bugger off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. I got it ...
and I thought it was funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RazBerryBeret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. I would consider it a win if
Obama can come within 5 points of her. She's always been favored to win big. if they end up with ALMOST the same amount of delegates I would consider it a win. I'm still hoping he can pull it out and win more of the votes--if that would happen, it would probably be the biggest upset of the primary season....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
americanstranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. By my lights, if Obama gets within 10%
it's all good.

The Expectations game (and plenty of Clinton partisans) are looking for a blowout win - 15 to 20% to re-gain momentum going forward. If Hillary doesn't blow him out in PA, get your fork.

- as
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quakerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. I agree.
Edited on Sat Mar-29-08 11:47 PM by quakerboy
within 10% would be major for Obama.

60/40 or worse would be a setback for Obama.

And there is a really wide Grey area that doesn't really help anyone enough and just gives the damn pundits more to spin with.

Granted the 65% is what she really needs, but she can stay technically in the game with a little less, because the superdelegates can give a fair amount of wiggle room to either side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
housewolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #4
27. I heard Obama's campaign say that too... within 10 points would be a win
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky 13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #4
28. A win for Hillary is if an asteroid falls to earth and strikes Obama.
Other than that, she's toast.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. a win for Clinton is subjective
and depends on which of these narratives the press decides to run with:

- she was up 30%, so she needs at least 20% to prove it really is a win.

- she needs the 65% of the delegates required for her to be a mathmatical contestant

- she wins by even 1%, that is a win, even though a delegate tie, she is 'creeping up on obama in the popular vote' meme.

Personally, I think that a win of less than 14% is a huge loss for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. I was going to say if she wins by less than 15% she's lost. She needs 57% of the vote minimum to.
Edited on Sat Mar-29-08 11:36 PM by John Q. Citizen
barely hang on and try to spin that as momentum.

She really needs to win by 65% to honstly claim a big and significant win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RazBerryBeret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. did anyone see
Tim Russert talking about that "strategy memo" that the Obama camp accidentally sent to a reporter? It was before super tuesday, and they had surprisingly forecast the states they would win (pretty accurately). I saw it on a video, but can't seem to find it now. I was just wondering if PA was in their win column or not....I know they had forecast NOT winning Ohio or TX...just wondering...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ossman Donating Member (883 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I was just thinking about that today. It has been spot on in its predictions. It went to Bloomberg
Russert is the only one that talks about it. Let me know if you find it. Im too lazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RazBerryBeret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. ok, it took some time...
Edited on Sat Mar-29-08 11:37 PM by RazBerryBeret
but I found it!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xAPkoqW-yWo


why would it be titled "Russert Damas"?

and here's the actual "memo"

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0208/Obamas_projections.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ossman Donating Member (883 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. I found this spreadsheet too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RazBerryBeret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. awesome....
see, you shouldn't label yourself Lazy!!!

nice to see they haven't projected to win PA....
AND they won Maine, which they weren't projecting...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. Good God, these predictions are SPOT-ON ACCURATE.
Their goal seems to be to get within 5% of Clinton in PA.

Wow! The Obama team really did their homework. Also, interesting to note, they think they can win Indiana. http://journals.democraticunderground.com/Tatiana/23">So do I.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RazBerryBeret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. yes, it's amazing...
that it was written BEFORE super tuesday.
they've run such a sharp campaign.....

I HOPE they can win Indiana!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzybeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
8. One stage in a race matters as a part of the whole sum, what matters is the sum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gravity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
10. Hillary needs to win by 30%
to make a viable argument in getting the nomination.

If she wins by 20%, she will declare herself the winner, but it ain't gonna help her chances.

If within 10%, Obama will probably be better off from this because he held his ground on a state heavily favoring Hillary.

and if Obama beats Hillary by 1%, I bet she will even see that it is over for her
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
11. For Obama, a win is prolly anything that doesn't eat into his delegate lead much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
12. I would call an even delegate split a win for Obama. anything less is a loss (if only a slight one)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
17. Anything less than a 20% win is a loss for Hillary. Delegate-wise she needs more, but I'll move...
the goalpost closer for her in this case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
18. After Wisconsin she needed to win ALL states by 60% or MORE
to even close the gap (she hasn't..and won't)

PA is just window-dressing for her..

She'll probably win by single digits and the delegate count will be close..Obama will more than make it up with NC and what he wins in Indiana..

It's mathematically impossible for her to catch him..she just won;t admit it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
19. When one quits, the other remains
the winner is the one who remains

unless neither quits

then it gets interesting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
21. Funny you should ask this on the night that Obama appears to have taken TX
Edited on Sun Mar-30-08 12:16 AM by rocknation
Hillary needs to get close enough to Obama to be able to plead her case to the superdelegates without looking like a complete idiot. That will require that she win at least 65% of popular vote in PA and in all the other remaining contests, so I'd say that she has to win PA by at least 20 points just to look legitimate. (The MSM will no doubt scream "Comeback Kid!" if she wins at all, but don't believe the hype--they have an agenda of their own.) An Obama Texas victory raises that margin. Obama's "magic number," therefore, is an average of about 40% of the popular vote from here on in.

:headbang:
rocknation

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SwampG8r Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
23. i gotta go to bed
but you all have done n ol man heart good
so far almost every post replying was actually thought out
i commend both sides for this
give yourselves a pat on the back
and ill buy everyone a beer

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmperorHasNoClothes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
26. Here's some percentages
Currently Clinton needs 66% of the remaining pledged delegates to tie Obama (in pledged delegates)

If she wins 70% in PA, she will need 65% of the delegates in every state after Pennsylvania
If she wins 65% in PA, she will need 67% of the delegates in every state after Pennsylvania
If she wins 60% in PA, she will need 69% of the delegates in every state after Pennsylvania
If she wins 55% in PA, she will need 71% of the delegates in every state after Pennsylvania
If she wins 50% in PA, she will need 73% of the delegates in every state after Pennsylvania

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #26
36. thanks for this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hamlette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
29. Hillary will move the goal posts to a .0001% win as a landslide if necessary
If Obama loses by more than 10%, I'll nervously check his delegate count, which should still be fine.

A question of equal significance is NC. How will they do there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RazBerryBeret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. in the strategy memo....
the Obama campaign has projected a win in NC, 53% - 45%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hamlette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. thanks...I was hoping for a little more
my guess is the two states cancel each other out. She'll have about 10 in PA he'll have about 10 in NC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigbrother05 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
32. HRC needs +15%, BHO needs -5%
Obviously the Clinton campaign will tout 1 vote as a victory, but given that everyone has called PA Clinton country and the spread was so high, anything less than a blowout would not bring her additional SD support.

If Obama can get it close, he will match her delegate take in PA and can claim to have reclaimed momentum. With a balance of support in PA, some of the SDs on the fence should feel comfortable to declare for the clear frontrunner.

A finish in between will mean groundhog day, six more weeks of divisive campaigning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
34. Clinton would have to win every vote in the state to have a victory on this forum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC