Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary's "secret" strategy is to win the popular vote.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 09:31 AM
Original message
Hillary's "secret" strategy is to win the popular vote.
That is why FL and MI are so important for her. The only way she will have any credibility or legitimacy is if she wins the popular vote. It is almost a certainty that she will not win the most delegates. However, if she is very close in the popular vote when all the primaries are over, she can stake claim to being the popular favorite of the people. Obama will say that it is all about who get the most delegates.

But, much depends on the next 3 primaries. If she loses the overall popular vote in PA, NC, and IN, then she will seriously consider her options. Without the popular vote, she will only be running a quixotic campaign with no credible way of winning. This would have to be the only strategy that the campaign is presently running on - win the popular vote and convince the Super Delegates that the people want Hillary. The voter turnout in PA and NC will be very, very important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
greguganus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. Popular votes are easier to steal. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Right. Unlike caucuses. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
2. there is NO SUCH THING as a "popular vote" in a Primary that includes caucuses
Edited on Sun Mar-30-08 09:34 AM by cryingshame
any DU'er who even posts about the "popular vote" displays a willful ignorance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. And the same might be argued in regards to FL and MI...
We cannot count the popular vote in a state where the candidates were not able to campaign or where some were not even on the ballot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. and.........
all the fake concern about "disenfranchising" us Floridians (who I can only speak for, as one) I can tell you guys this; We aren't worried whether or not our asshole delegates are seated at the convention or not because we WILL be voting in HUGE numbers in November, regardless-for Obama-at least in this household.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Florida is mostly a political pawn at the moment...
I agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. I don't know about willful but pointing out what goes into a vote count
certainly should reduce the ignorance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BumRushDaShow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
5. This contest is to select a candidate
The selection is based on delegates. Period.

She has lost. Time for her to concede and let's move on to fight McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. That is exactly the argument of Obama supporters.
However, these same folks thought Al Gore should have been President in 2000 because he won the popular vote. The popular vote still holds a lot of sway within the Democratic Party. That is why it is important for Obama to win the popular vote and the most delegates. Only then will Hillary give up the ghost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wileedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. Apples and oranges
If Florida swings the other way, Gore WINS the Electoral College vote. The argument was that because the FL election was a complete mess, then perhaps it was valid to look at the next yardstick down, which was popular vote. If Bush had in fact been winning the Electoral College by 160+ then this Gore popular vote logic would have been completely moot.

There is no valid argument for turning over a legitimate and large Pledged Delegate vote count on the basis of popular vote, unless the rules are changed before the contest.

None.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. Which same folks are you talking about?
If Gore had lost Florida by 100000 votes, he would have still won the popular vote, but no one would have argued that he deserved to be president. But there was clear evidence that illegal voter disenfranchisement that was orders of magnitude greater than the margin of victory. That is why I believe that Gore really won the election, not because he was the popular vote winner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Many, including myself, believe that Gore won popular vote in FL
that Bush and Gang stole enough votes to make it close and then refused to have all the votes counted and then appealed it to the Supreme Court, who had no business whatsoever trying to determine who voted and who did not vote in the state of Florida.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
10. She can't make that claim without considering
the popular votes from caucuses. If she doesn't consider them, she is disenfranchising another bunch of states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Aren't those votes counted in the popular vote?
Isn't that how they determine the number of delegates to each candidate??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freesqueeze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
11. FL and MI are a done deal
Continued discussion in that area on the part of the Clinton Camp is pure obfuscation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. But...
If Hillary is behind by 200,000 votes at the end, she will say that her votes in FL should be counted and that would give her the majority of the popular vote. The popular vote should not be so readily dismissed. That is why it is important for Obama to continue to win the popular vote also. That is the only card that Hillary has left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loveangelc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. You really think Hillary will close a 700,000 vote win in PA to 200,000???
bc she probably won't win NC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. Are you counting FL and MI??
I think Hillary had about a 300,000 vote majority in FL??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loveangelc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. no, bc I don't think he leaders and those over the convention will allow them to be counted
until there is a nominee.

this isnt going to the convention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wileedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. Everyone be careful
We're moving the goal posts again. Watch yer heads.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
14. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
loveangelc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
16. ...What if she wins Pa and loses Nc?
Edited on Sun Mar-30-08 12:57 PM by loveangelc
everyone knows she's going to win pennsylvania.

north carolina and indiana may just be the final showdown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. My point is that Hillary thinks she may win the overall popular vote..
when all is said and done, if FL and MI are counted? She will then argue before the Convention that she won the majority of votes and should be the nominee? She would argue that the caucuses shold not carry as much weight as the popular vote. I think Obama understands where she is headed with this. If he can continue to beat her in the popular vote, she will have no legitimate claim. I think she understands that point as well. She wants the popular vote....bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JayFredMuggs Donating Member (881 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. You mean she wants to count Michigan because.....
She was on the ballot and Obama wasn't?

Gee how CONVEEEENIENT!!!! Isn't THAT SPECIAL!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Doesn't hurt to try, huh?
She says they didn't have to take their names off the MI ballot? And the FL primary was right after Obama had won his big victory in SC. He was on a roll. Everybody knew about him and his name was on the ballot in Florida, as was john Edwards, and Hillary won by a large margin anyway. Personally, I think Hillary has a better argument with Florida than with Michigan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC