|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
senseandsensibility (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-30-08 04:19 PM Original message |
What do you think of Bill Clinton's argument that he was in third place |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crunchy Frog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-30-08 04:26 PM Response to Original message |
1. Not particularly valid, as far as I can tell. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MannyGoldstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-30-08 04:26 PM Response to Original message |
2. It's Probably Not True |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
senseandsensibility (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-30-08 04:30 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. He said that he was in third place behind Bush 1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MannyGoldstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-30-08 04:33 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. Then It's Irrelevant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalAndProud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-30-08 04:56 PM Response to Reply #4 |
14. Well, that's different, then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevebreeze (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-30-08 05:07 PM Response to Reply #2 |
18. super tuesday was second week in march in '92 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Garbo 2004 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-30-08 04:29 PM Response to Original message |
3. He was the presumptive Dem nominee in April 92. Third place in polls behind Bush & Perot. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-30-08 04:30 PM Response to Original message |
5. It's not the same thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
senseandsensibility (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-30-08 04:32 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. So he wasn't beating up another Dem? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueManDude (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-30-08 04:35 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. He forgot to mention he had the Dem nomination sewn up at that point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VolcanoJen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-30-08 04:35 PM Response to Original message |
9. It's about as valid as his continuing fib that he didn't wrap up the nomination... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
housewolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-30-08 04:51 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. That actually is a true statement. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VolcanoJen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-30-08 05:01 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. There wasn't a single human being in this country... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
housewolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-30-08 05:30 PM Response to Reply #16 |
21. Nonetheless |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
housewolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-30-08 04:45 PM Response to Original message |
10. No, he wasn't - there were only 2 candidates & he was the front-runner |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalAndProud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-30-08 04:52 PM Response to Original message |
12. Did he really say that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EmperorHasNoClothes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-30-08 04:54 PM Response to Original message |
13. It would be valid for him to say that after New Hampshire |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
housewolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-30-08 04:58 PM Response to Original message |
15. It may have be a true statement if he was talking about a Perot, Bush I & Clinton race |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UALRBSofL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-30-08 05:04 PM Response to Original message |
17. If you listened a little closer he said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-30-08 05:18 PM Response to Original message |
19. He was versus Perot and Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
totodeinhere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-30-08 05:20 PM Response to Original message |
20. When he was in 3rd place the race was still wide open. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikekohr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-30-08 06:05 PM Response to Original message |
22. Upon Perot's Return in 1992, He Won 19% of the National Vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Honeycombe8 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-30-08 06:08 PM Response to Original message |
23. #1...I don't think that's a true statement. #2...campaigns got off to very late start comparedtonow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:52 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC