Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Have You Matched Obama's Net Worth against the Net Worth of his Opponents, Dem and Rep alike?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Mike03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:29 PM
Original message
Have You Matched Obama's Net Worth against the Net Worth of his Opponents, Dem and Rep alike?
This is just a rhetorical question, and probably a waste of one of my precious posts here at GDP.

Obama's net wealth is minimal to say the least, in comparison to the net wealth of most individuals who run for highest office.

I just want some folks here to think about that. Obama doesn't come from wealth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Here it is......




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JPZenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
40. Most of Obama's money from his books
Obama is not rich, but the money he has is from the sale of his two books. He also has a large mortgage on his house. He and his wife needed years to pay off all of their student loans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #40
49. his liabilities nearly cancel his assets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w13rd0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
45. Subprime mortgages...
...for Clinton and McCain, House(s), plural. For Obama, House, singular.

And most of Obama's "net worth" is tied up in the home he shares with his wife and children. For Clinton and McCain, it's all cash and trusts...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sallyseven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #45
53. They also are older than Obama.
They had more time to save. McCain's wife is rich. Bill raked in s lot of money since he stepped down from the presidency. Lets not com-are apples and oranges. He is no saint because he doesn't have a lot of money yet. I am sure he will manage if he gets elected to make a lot of money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. We don't know; the Clintons haven't released their numbers. What
are they waiting for? But we know they might make a bit more than Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I bet it is Theresa Heinz type money
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Oh, yea. Look upthread; FrenchieCat posted some astounding numbers. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Not that Bush & Cheney aren't, but extreme wealth seems to hurt D candidates in the eyes of the
public more. Edwards humongous house did hurt him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enigmatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. They are all over a million in net worth, Mike
None of them are poor. How many millions doesn't matter; it's about a million dollars more than 90 percent of the country have ever had.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. umm yes it does... a million dollars net worth is closer to upper middle class
in many parts of the country (particularly big cities). Clinton and McCain have well over 30 million. That's *truly* rich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enigmatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. Mean household income income in the US
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Household_income_in_the_United_States

They are all within the top 7 percent. It doesn't matter to me when they got it; they are still there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #18
37. You're in "orders of magnitude" territory now.
The difference between the 'top 7%' and the 'top 3%' is hundreds of millions of dollars.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #18
39. That's median household income - not Net Worth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #18
50. cancel his liabilities against his assets and he's down in the dirt
for a man in his position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Obama's been a millionaire for about 2 years......
His net worth is 1.3 million only due to the value of his home. Net worth represents the VALUE of your assets less your debt.

They are part of the working upper class since like 5 hours ago. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
34. There's is a HUGE difference between a net worth of 1 million and 30 million.
It boils down to liquidity. While a million is a good threshold, it doesn't translate into liquidable assets the way that 30 million does.

A million dollars net worth still means you have to budget for things like housing costs, energy, and gasoline... it just makes it easier to do things you like to do.

30 million net worth means you have funds set up whose interest pays for everything you need to get by... hence, there's little budgeting necessary.

A million net worth is nice, but it's merely upper middle class. 30 million net worth is high class bucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tpsbmam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. In fairness....
neither did Hillary and Bill. They made most of their money after Bill left office. If Obama wins, I suspect his bank account after he leaves office will begin to look like the rest of them. Some of them inherited, but many of them are self-made.....or in the case of McCain, married well. :P Though I do hold it against some who've inherited and never known what it was like to live paycheck to paycheck (Bush), I don't really hold it against most of them who made the money on their own (depending on how they made it). I have lots of Hillary complaints, but her personal bank account isn't one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RazBerryBeret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. except for the fact...
That Bill has made a TON of money after leaving office by ...
SPEAKING!!!

isn't that ironic?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Penndems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. How is that "ironic"?
He was President of the United States for eight years, he's charismatic as hell and connects with people, many of the audiences he addresses are contributors to the Clinton Foundation and charities he supports.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Just words.........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Penndems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. No, not "just words"
Edited on Sun Mar-30-08 07:02 PM by Penndems
Foreign policy speeches, speeches on energy efficiency, AIDS, relief for victims of Hurricane Katrina, just to name a few.

It makes a difference when you've actually been President of the United States. There's no other job in the world like it, and only that fraternity of men who've occupied the Oval Office know it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. I certainly wouldn't blame him.
If I could make that much just having people listen to me talk, I'd do it in a heart beat. But I think that that part isn't what people worry about--rather it's the question of undisclosed business dealings, and who's contributing to the CGI and Clinton Library.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RazBerryBeret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. But keep in mind...
those are just words,
Speeches aren't important...

words don't put food on your table
words don't pay your mortgage....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Penndems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. They may not be of importance to you, but they are to others
who will gladly pay to hear what he has to say on issues of the day.

Former President Clinton is still fondly thought of by millions of people in this country who remember the prosperity we experience during the mid-to-late 1990s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RazBerryBeret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Hey, I'm paraphrasing
his wife...
In Ohio....first week of March!
Those aren't my words...


I'm not saying Bill isn't worth the fees, Hell, I'd pay to see him.
the point is that his wife shouldn't discount a great speech.

see I'm an Ohioan still holding a grudge...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #21
55. but Clinton has matched his words with actions - Obama to date - not so much
Edited on Sun Mar-30-08 07:53 PM by papau
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #11
51. I want to know about some of the dodgy transactions that he is
supposed to be part of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tpsbmam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. LOL Yeah, but if people are willing to pay those ridiculous fees...
why shouldn't he get them? Look at the Republican assholes out there getting whopping speaking fees. :puke: And both made a fair amount off of their books. I personally want to know how much of their income comes from nefarious and foreign ties -- that, for me, is much more interesting and problematic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RazBerryBeret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. yes, I agree he
should make what he can...
I was poking fun at his wife saying words aren't important...
words can put food on your table etc. etc...

THAT I find ironic...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
35. Thanks for that post. I should have read it before I posted.
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
9. A good amount of his money is new to him too, from more recent book sales
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
13. Washington Post - Measuring Wealth of the '08 Candidates (last March)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/24/AR2007032400305_pf.html

Whole article is interesting but here are a few figures on the Dem side. Biden and Dodd were my original top 2 choices, no coincidence!

...
As a community organizer-turned-law professor-turned-state senator-turned U.S. senator, the bulk of Obama's wealth has come only in the past few years, with the huge success of his second book, " The Audacity of Hope."

Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter came to the White House without much money, but most presidents had already achieved substantial wealth by the time they reached 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. This year, the top presidential contenders have found their places among the upper, upper class in different ways.

...
Hillary Clinton was never rich until the end of her husband's term, when they each wrote best-selling books and he made millions giving speeches.
...

Some of the other candidates, though, are not wealthy by the measure of the leading contenders. One reason for this is that these candidates have spent very large chunks of their life in public office.

...
Sen.John McCain(R-Ariz.)
Net worth: $25-$38 million

Sen.Hillary Rodham Clinton(D-N.Y.)
Net worth: $10-$50 million

Sen.Barack Obama(D-Ill.)
Net worth: $1-$2.5 million*

Former senator John Edwards(D-N.C.)
Net worth: More than $12.8 million to $60 million.

Sen.Chris Dodd(D-Conn.)
Net worth: $260,000-$682,000

Sen.Joe Biden(D-Del.)
Net worth: $100,000-$150,000

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. also a CNN article has Kucinich and Gravel info
http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/05/17/candidates.wealth/index.html

While Huckabee and Gravel reported assets into the six figures, Biden, who has been serving in the Senate since he was 30, told the FEC that his assets were only between $62,000 and $405,000, with liabilities of between $140,000 and $365,000.

His only reported income in 2006, in addition to his $165,000 Senate salary, interests and dividends, was $28,700 for teaching at Widener University in Pennsylvania.

The only candidate in the race who had not filed a report with the FEC or received an extension as of Thursday was Rep. Dennis Kucinich, D-Ohio. His 2005 report showed assets between $196,000 and $352,000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #13
30. I have a hard time believing that Biden is only worth $150K
lifelong civil servant or not, his annual salary is still $169,300.

http://usgovinfo.about.com/library/weekly/aa031200a.htm


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #30
38. I think he re-mortgaged his house to help borrow money for his daughter's college tuition
but I'm not sure, and not sure how each source does its calculations? He is often cited as in the bottom 10 in the Senate for wealth. His family background is not wealthy.

His wife is a professor at a community college in Delaware. When she was hit by a tractor trailer a couple of months ago, the reports said she was driving a 1999 or 2000 car I think. I remember saying, well it's as old as my car, but mine's not a BMW...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #38
43. Sounds like the Bidens need some financial planning
they probably pull in north of $200K between the two of them. It's cool that he's obviously not in the pocket of corporate interests, but I'd think that having a very well paying job for over thirty years would have padded his accounts a bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #43
46. I remember something about avoiding conflict of interest stocks
Can't remember where I read that. So that may be affecting investments, but that's getting way into speculation (no pun intended)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #46
52. Good for Joe.
He's a good man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #52
54. here it is - owns no stock - funny quote - I can totally hear him saying this
Edited on Sun Mar-30-08 07:40 PM by JoeIsOneOfUs
"I made some very stupid judgments when I got elected. I promised I'd never own a stock or a bond because Nixon had all that trouble with what stocks he owned. Very smart thing for guy to promise," Biden said with disdain.

"The worst part is that in my neighborhood, a promise made is a promise kept. I've kept it for thirty years so guess what, lucky me, I don't own a single share of stock."

:D

edit for link: http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/26/biden-financial-literacy-begins-with-how-youre-raised/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrJJ Donating Member (657 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
17. HRC
Just a financial but one heck of a spread $10 Mill too $50 mill? 47 pages

Hillary Clinton (D-NY) - 2006 Politician Profile Net Worth: From $10,360,009 to $51,021,998 Ranks 9th among all members of the Senate. Assets: 10 totaling $10,460,009 to $51,052,000. Liabilities: 2 totaling $30,002 to $100,000.

http://www.opensecrets.org/pfds/candlook.php?txtName=clinton

http://www.opensecrets.org/pfds/CIDsummary.php?CID=N00000019&year=2006

http://www.opensecrets.org/pfds/candlook.php?capcode=h3mpd&CID=N00000019&submit=Submit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
20. I think it is instructional to compare how both Hillary and Obama came from modest backgrounds
but got ahead through hard work. McCain got ahead by marrying into money, after divorcing his first wife.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. yes, I give both of them credit for working hard nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesertRat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. Excellent point. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Penndems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #20
32. Good point. Thanks, PA Democrat.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
28. We know that Clinton donated $5 mil of her own money to the campaign
obviously that says something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quantass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. ..and charging her supporters Interest for doing so -- she might as well make money off them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #29
36. Sure am glad that I'm not one of them.
Though I probably will be if she happens to win the nomination. Maybe I'll just give directly to the DNC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bellasgrams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
31. The Clinton's didn't come from wealth either. They worked for it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JayFredMuggs Donating Member (881 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #31
41. Worked?
Or made speeches?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #41
44. Or made deals with shady people and the Saudi's?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bellasgrams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-31-08 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #41
56. She worked paying her way through law school. One of her
jobs was working one summer on a fishing boat. A very hard and dirty job, but she did it. When finished she used her law degree to make the job better for those coming after her. Do you think BO would get his hands dirty, with smelly fish? I think not. Of course you know all the jobs she's had since becoming an attorney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
33. Neither did the Clinton's. As a matter of fact, they did not own
a home until after Bill's Presidencies, and they were purchased with advances from both of their autobiographies. Obama is very young, so you should compare him to people his age, not older politicians who have been earning money for a while.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
42. Excuse me ...
but your headline was about net WORTH not net WEALTH; there is difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ysabel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
47. yes i have...
- i know the difference between his net worth and that of the other candidates i most always check that sort of thing...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MattP Donating Member (525 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
48. That Wealth is probably not the same anymore.
How much money has been lost on that house as a result of the downturn? I know that everybody that has a large amount of Wealth on paper has taken a huge hit because of home values taking a spiral. I know people that have lost 400,000 to 500,000$ in the last 6 months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC