|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
WolverineDG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-30-08 06:59 PM Original message |
Photos of the improperly-run Webb County Convention |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-30-08 07:03 PM Response to Original message |
1. Can you explain what went wrong, Wolvie? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hawkeye-X (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-30-08 07:05 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Webb went unanimous for Clinton due to rule-breaking from what I hear. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Justitia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-31-08 10:30 AM Response to Reply #4 |
18. All 51 delegates to Clinton??? That is completely nuts (& wrong)! -eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WolverineDG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-30-08 07:09 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Well, take the TDP rules handbook |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-30-08 07:31 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. No wonder you're ticked. I hope this has been reported somewhere. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-30-08 08:06 PM Response to Reply #5 |
13. you can challenge it at the state convention - should be easily overturned |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Justitia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-31-08 10:28 AM Response to Reply #13 |
16. Can it be challenged if no Obama delegates to State were allowed? -eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gristy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-30-08 07:03 PM Response to Original message |
2. A little background please... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WolverineDG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-30-08 07:11 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. A complete & total disregard for the rules of the TDP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gkhouston (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-31-08 10:13 AM Response to Reply #7 |
14. it does a lot more than that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hawkeye-X (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-30-08 07:04 PM Response to Original message |
3. Thanks for the photos. What will be done about the convention? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quakerboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-30-08 07:10 PM Response to Original message |
6. so what exactly happened? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gristy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-30-08 07:17 PM Response to Original message |
8. So county conventions in Texas are either winner take all or they are not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WolverineDG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-30-08 07:21 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. No, they're not winner take all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Justitia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-31-08 10:29 AM Response to Reply #8 |
17. No, they aren't winner take all, they are proportional. -eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-30-08 07:36 PM Response to Original message |
11. that's just friggin nuts and not anyway to pick a president! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TomBall Democrat (332 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-31-08 10:21 AM Response to Reply #11 |
15. Well, you may think it's nuts - and that's ok with me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SeattleGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-30-08 07:46 PM Response to Original message |
12. Not good, Wolvie. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-31-08 10:33 AM Response to Original message |
19. Yeah... I kinda expected this would happen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Celebration (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-31-08 12:30 PM Response to Original message |
20. Thanks so much |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-31-08 01:20 PM Response to Original message |
21. You need to explain better |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Apr 24th 2024, 04:34 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC