Were you satisfied McAuliffe used our DNC donations fr2001-2005 to secure the election

[blm]

Poll question: Were you satisfied McAuliffe used our DNC donations fr2001-2005 to secure the election

process and vigorously counter the RNC as it worked for the four years after 2000's theft to continue gaining control of every level of the process where the votes are allowed, cast and counted?


You are also encouraged to post how you feel about the differences you see from McAuliffe's stewardship of the Dem party and its infrastructure and the rebuilding of infrastructure Howard Dean has pursued through his stewardship of the party.

Personal view - Dean had a tough job rebuilding so much of the Dem party infrastructure that had been collapsed by previous party chairs, and the difference is starting to be noticed, especially in states long left to collapse to dominant RNC thugs since 1994. But, I think the election process for 2008 will be at LEAST 50% more secure than 2000 and 2004, thanks to Chairman Dean. And ANY Dem can win with that.

[Swamp Rat]

1. McAuliffe should be in another profession,

like washing dishes.

[blm]

3. If he was so unwilling to work for Dem voters and candidates WHY did Clintons TAP HIM to head DNC

with all its serious duties around the country and at such a crucial time after 2000s theft, when they wouldn't even tap him to run Hillary's 2008 campaign in any way other than to secure DONATIONS?

[Swamp Rat]

4. Because they preferred Mark Penn&Co., campaign 'jeenyus' extraordinaire.

:D

[havocmom]

2. McAuliffe is a neocon & PNACer enabler at best

And a collaborator with traitors at worst.

He should NEVER hold a position with the Democratic Party again.

[blm]

5. Well, apparently SOME Dems here at DU were satisfied with McAuliffe's stewardship.

Four years is a LONG TIME To control what shape the party and its infrastructure is in by the time the nominee is known.

[havocmom]

7. Some believe a youngster with poetry = sniper too

Some believe some pretty damaging things.

[blm]

6. poll kick....would love to hear from proMcAuliffe posters, too.

.

[havocmom]

8. We will...

when the C.O.D.A. meeting lets out ;)

[blm]

12. Well, 11 are satisfied but decided not to explain why they believe so.

.

[TexasObserver]

9. He earned the moniker McAwful.

He is the worst party chair ever, another part of the sad Clinton legacy.

[KittyWampus]

10. All he did was modernize the data bases to make it easier for the Clinton Machine to rake in money

FOR THEMSELVES and control the levers of power.

[blm]

11. This is what we've heard for years before - now with the reality of HRC's campaign for prez we

know the truth about their machinations. Sad to say those pundits who called this years ago were the ones who SAID the Clintons and their loyalists were planning her 2008 run and didn't CARE about Dems succeeding in 2000, 2002 or 2004.