Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kristol, NYT: Republicans see the weaknesses of party and McCain, assume Obama will prevail

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 10:02 AM
Original message
Kristol, NYT: Republicans see the weaknesses of party and McCain, assume Obama will prevail
Who ultimately wins? In politics, as in life, the grass is always greener on the other side of the fence. Many Republicans I know see the weaknesses of their party and of the McCain campaign all too clearly, and assume Obama will prevail.

But a surprising number of Democrats with whom I’ve spoken expect a McCain victory. One told me he was struck by the current polls showing a dead-even race, suggesting both a surprising openness to McCain among Americans who disapprove of Bush and a striking hesitation among the same voters about Obama.

Then there’s the fact that we’re at war. As a Congressional staffer put it, “Here’s something to consider: Although Hillary will be out in May, she may determine the outcome in November. McCain’s secret weapon — among Clinton supporters — may be Hillary’s 3 a.m. national security ad.”

And an experienced Democratic operative e-mailed: “Finally, I think McCain’s going to win. Obama isn’t growing in stature. Once I thought he could be Jimmy Carter, but now he reminds me more of Michael Dukakis with the flag lapel thing and defending Wright. Plus he doesn’t have a clue how to talk to the middle class. He’s in the Stevenson reform mold out of Illinois, with a dash of Harvard disease thrown in.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/07/opinion/07kristol.html?_r=2&scp=1&sq=bill%20Kristol&st=nyt&oref=slogin&oref=slogin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
u2spirit Donating Member (727 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. What sucks is that Kristol is never right
sigh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yeah, he likes to position himself as someone with his "finger on the pulse"...
...and nothing could be further from the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GarbagemanLB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. Is this the same guy that used a false Newsmax story in one of his articles?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
4. "experienced Democratic operative"
We still don't know who any of these schmoes actually *are*, do we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Yes...I had to make sure to include that part...
...Kristol's like the old-school Hollywood gossip columnists: "My sources tell me..."

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. it's not just Kristol.
These "operatives" and "strategists" who, poor souls, seem to not have been given names of their own, are ubiquitous in the press and every last one of them spouts this pseudo-DLC shit. I'm always reminded of "Dem_Strategist", the wanking wonk who graced us with his presence on DU four years ago long enough to drop the hilarity that, while we're playing checkers, Kerry prefers chess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. They are the people he imagines he's talking to whenever he drops acid. Which
would also explain that that shit eating grin he always has.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yurovsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
5. It will come down to getting out the base ...
and I've always held that Obama or HRC would do a better job of getting out the Dem base than gramps would do in getting out the GOP base. No way the bible-thumping/home-schooling/snake-handling wing of the GOP comes out to vote for gramps (well, maybe if he makes Huckleberry the VP, but that would kill gramps' chances with independents).

I see a big Dem win in November. If HRC drops out after PA, and Obama has 6.5 months to pound gramps & W, we could see a landslide (60+ in the senate, increased House majority, etc). It might finally be safe for poor John Paul Stephens to retire. Who knows, one or two appointments might be enough to get some of the crazy Roberts-court BS reversed.

At the very least, the war will end soon and health care will become more accessible to all. I expect both within the first year if my landslide forecast pans out.

GOBAMA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayak9 Donating Member (35 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. An electoral tidal wave
This is my greatest hope for Obama v. McCain. Absent a false flag-type terrorist attack, the Pukes aren't going to survive in any recognizable form. When poeple get their fill of stupidly high gas prices, continuing $12 billion/month cost of Iraq fiasco, home repossessions, corporate welfare, insane foreign policy, innumerable scandals, etc.,etc., the Republican brand will be forever diminished.

Obama, with his new politics, represents a movement, which has the capacity to roll over the political landscape like that tidal wave that hit in Indonesia - wiping away all the decay and older structures so that they can be replaced by new more workable ones. Then, we might actually be able to procede into the 21st century, like we might have - had Gore been elected in 2000. As it now stands, it may take us 40 years to undo the damage the Bushies have wrought. A Bandeh Aceh-type tidal wave this election would really help effect that change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC