Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mark Penn's Earlier Version Of 3 A.M. Ad Was Negative Direct Hit On Obama

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 07:04 PM
Original message
Mark Penn's Earlier Version Of 3 A.M. Ad Was Negative Direct Hit On Obama
Here's an interesting postscript to the saga of Mark Penn, who stepped down from his role as Hillary's chief strategist yesterday:

Penn had an earlier version of the infamous 3 A.M. ad that was much more of a negative spot attacking Barack Obama, and the attack prompted objections from other senior Hillary advisers, a Hillaryland source familiar with internal discussions over the ad tells me.

Among those senior advisers who objected to the ad's negative content was senior ad guru Mandy Grunwald, who's clashed with Penn in the past, the source says.

-----

"This was the way it was originally conceived," the adviser says. "It did not say the words `Barack Obama.' But there was a contrast part. It had a clear hit on Obama and it also had a much more negative feeling with the music."

The adviser continues: "The original ad asked, Who would you prefer answering the call -- someone with strength and experience, or someone who's untested?"

http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/04/mark_penns_original_version_of.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. That was a brilliant ad, I must say, even as an Obama supporter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. She/they were wise to tone it down a bit.
They still made the point very clearly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Azathoth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. It's not a brilliant ad...it's a more toned-down version of Bush's "wolf" ad
which was itself an evolution of LBJ's daisy ad. "Vote for me, cause your children are gonna suffer/die with the other guy." Not brilliant, not profound, just plain old fear-mongering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. I would assume that most, if not all, ads go through a process where different ideas are
tried out and discarded before the final script is chosen. I'm sure that several statements are rejected before they come up with the finished product and that there would be disagreement between staff members as to which would be the most effective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthlover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. Quite frankly, the harsher ad was probably rejected because of fear of a backlash
If they thought it would be more effective, does ANYONE think they would hesitate a millisecond to trash Obama?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Azathoth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. self-delete
Edited on Mon Apr-07-08 07:54 PM by Azathoth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC