If "experience" is really all that matters, why not support a Cheney run?

[FlyingTiger]

After all, he's got tons. We could start a "Draft Cheney" movement, complete with spiffy website. A few good email campaigns might do the trick.

Or, hey, how 'bout a third term for Bush? Who'd have more relevant experience for running the White House in 2009 than the guy who just did it in 2008?

[Alter Ego]

1. Pretty sure you need to be human to run for President.

[Buzz Clik]

8. Well, he changed his residence from Texas to Wyoming to allow him to be VP.

Surely he could officially change species to run for prez.



Here's Baby Dick. You can bet yer ass he was never breast fed.

[mwb970]

2. Well, McCain would be *almost* like a bush third term.

With a bonus of the "extra crazy" that happens to a man when he is tortured for five years instead of being drunk on his butt for 20, as the current POS occupant was.

[MethuenProgressive]

3. Experience doesn't matter. Hence: Obama.

Nice phishing post, FT.

[stellanoir]

4. "experience" = antiquated divisive bellicose war mongering ideology

[davidpdx]

5. Hmm...let me think about that for a second...

Ok, I'm done

[Hugabear]

6. McCain has more experience than Hillary and Obama combined

And if he taps Condaliar Rice for his VP, you can't get much more experienced than that. Just sayin'.

[Buzz Clik]

7. I wouldn't support Cheney because he's a criminal and I am at odds with his politics.

Despite his experience.

[bluestateguy]

9. That's why I'm glad that James Buchanan won in 1856

Because he was the most experienced candidate.