Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Exactly how was Obama "telling the truth" about small-town America's "anti-trade" sentiments?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 01:07 PM
Original message
Exactly how was Obama "telling the truth" about small-town America's "anti-trade" sentiments?
Edited on Sat Apr-12-08 01:12 PM by brentspeak
I keep reading threads and posts from Obama's most starry-eyed supporters where they claim that "Obama spoke the truth!" in his comments to the SF donor gathering. "He's being crucified for telling the truth!" But the Obama super-partisans are deliberately leaving something very important out when making their rationalizations:

Ignoring the rest of his comments made at the SF speech, how, exactly, was Obama "speaking the truth" when he said that rural Americans "explain their frustrations" by clinging to anti-trade sentiment? Isn't Obama supposed to be on the same side of working class Americans on that issue?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. So they're not bitter or frustrated?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. You mean he's wrong?
And that working class Americans are actually HAPPY to see their jobs shipped off to China, or Mexico, under the auspices of free-trade neoliberalism? Because that's what he's talking about. Can you honestly say it's not the case? That people aren't genuinely concerned about outsourcing, about the economic inequities between the US and these other countries that make the very idea of 'free trade' a bad joke? Come on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. he's suggesting that "anti-trade sentiment" is pathological
he lumps it in with the other symptoms of bumpkin bitterness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
20. Nope. But, project away. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #20
31. here's the quote
they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment.

see that? "Anti-trade sentiment," among the things that the folks cling to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. He named a range of things that people might latch onto
as a way to explain their situation to themselves.

That array was not closed.

He did not express an opinion about those items.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #31
38. Full quote in context:
You go into these small towns in Pennsylvania and, like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing's replaced them. And they fell through the Clinton Administration, and the Bush Administration, and each successive administration has said that somehow these communities are gonna regenerate and they have not. And it's not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.


http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/4/11/18416/8034/341/493923


Anybody who can read can see that he is clearly criticizing the politicians (like the Clintons) and corporations (like those that Clinton has represented) that created these conditions & have allowed them to continue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Holy crow
Edited on Sat Apr-12-08 01:20 PM by brentspeak
Somehow,you got everything in reverse. Obama's speech criticized rural Americans for their opposition to trade. And that's a mind-boggling criticism to make considering that Obama has up until now been saying that he himself shares their views on the issue of trade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sinistrous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Wow! What a complete twisting of what was said.
Obama was sympathizing with people for the causes of their bitterness, and you warp it into a baseless accusation of "criticism".!

Was your remark culpably dishonest, or just stupid?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. either one fits
the poster is in denial about the election
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. If there's anyone here who can translate the above post, please do so
Because I have no idea what this person is talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. Apparently, being disingenuous comes naturally to you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sinistrous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #19
35. Well, I was trying to be diplomatic.
If I had written the true evaluation of your spew, I would have been TS'd, and you are not worth that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
37. No, he was criticizing politicians & corporations for creating & nurturing those sediments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. Our government has screwed people over for 30 years
And yes, that INCLUDES Bill's two terms.

Profit margins on Wall street became the only goal, a goal that led to tens of millions of middle class jobs being outsourced.

Can you seriously believe Americans dont remember getting F'ed by every administration from Reagan through Bush today?

Wake the F up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. ..
Edited on Sat Apr-12-08 01:21 PM by brentspeak
:eyes:

You might want to state what you just stated directly to Obama; I'm someone who spends half his time on DU railing against our "free-trade" policies.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gore1FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
8. The democrats abandoned them
And the GOP wedged them with gun, "family values," etc. issues.

When the Democrats decided to write off "red" states, and "red" areas of "blue" states, the GOP swooped in with a fear strategy and then offered solutions.

Our party allowed this to happen. Rural voters are naturally Democrats, when you get right down to it. But instead of countering the GOP's strategy of setting fires and pretending to put them out, The Dems just wrote them off.

There is no good reason that West Virgina, The South, the West and the Midwest should inherently vote Republican. Obama simply addressed why they seemed to do so with such regularity.

Why isn't that the truth?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BumRushDaShow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Amen! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. You're not addressing my question
which is: why did Obama criticize rural voters for having "anti-trade sentiment" when he's been running as someone who shares the exact same sentiments?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gore1FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #17
40. I never said he criticzed them
I stated the contrary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
10. Wal Mart board executive = friend of the people!?? 109 million = non elitist? WTF!!!!
Are you fuckin crazy?

Lack Caferty said even college drop outs can understand what the hell he's saying/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #10
28. I'm not a Hillary supporter
Just someone who's going to dutifully but unhappily pull the lever for either Obama or Clinton in November. Don't take my posts concerning Obama as any kind of tacit support for Hillary. The best Dem candidates are long gone out of the race: Edwards (best), Dodd (second-best), Biden (third-best), Richardson (fourth-best).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
11. Are you kidding? There is a definite anti-trade sentiment.
Not just in the rural areas, but in the cities, too. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to see where our wonderful trade deals have gotten us. Jobs gone, cheap crap from China in and a huge trade deficit to boot. If workers were on a level playing field, trade would be just fine, but they aren't. If you think small town America is such a bunch of rubes they don't get this, you're wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Are you talking to me or Obama?
I'm not the one who criticized workers for having an anti-trade sentiment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #16
26. I didn't take his remark to be critical at all - he was stating a fact ,
not accusing people of anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. So then, is he saying that HE'S "clinging" to anti-trade sentiment?
???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. He's saying it fucking exists. For the love of God, go hunt for snipers. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
12. He was referring to overreactions
I am very much against the "free trade" con job. However, trade in itself is not a bad thing, and can be helpful to the ecoinomy and to people if it is done in a balanced way.

Obama wasn't saying guns are bad or religion is bad. He was referring to how people's anger at the government's failures to address their problems get transferred onto other issues.

I think he meant the same thing in regard to overreactions about trade.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VotesForWomen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
13. seems like he was being a little slippery. surprise. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. I've never read a positive post from you on this board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
14. He was making a truthful observation. Take it at that.
Edited on Sat Apr-12-08 03:08 PM by sparosnare
It doesn't mean he's not on their side. The only way to work through the issues dividing this country is to understand why - to talk about them. People in small town PA are deeply scarred by the plant closures and outsourcing; they are also resentful of those who move to their towns who compete for the only jobs that are left (usually retail).

Obama is on the same side of working class Americans. If the country is engaged in a discussion about what's going on with them, it only helps. Especially when they've been ignored for so long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
18. Unlike you, Obama was trying to put himself in someone else's shoes
to understand something.

I hope you're never challenged in the same way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. Uh, yeah, ok.
:eyes:

In the meantime, can you directly address the actual content of my OP? You know, about his apparent flip-flop on the issue of trade?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. But he wasn't talking about his own position. That's the point.
He was trying to understand where OTHER PEOPLE are coming from. You know, other people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #18
33. Exactly.
He's feeling the pain of many. On the campaign trail he's likely heard hundreds if not thousands of painful stories of life in rural America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #18
34. No one in Iowa needs to put themselves in someone else's shoes
where trade issues are concerned. Like Pennsylvania, brentspeak's state is paying heavily for the trade policies of the last two+ decades.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenDavid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
24. Is obama bitter because white men can jump?
The Obama Aid drinkers are out in full spinning for their messiah.He is not bitter but he probably has noticed that racists always make it about race. He's bitter because his race card, hypnotism, political/religious revival gig is exposed... and he looks like a really slick con.His big money doners are probably drying up too and losing admiration because of backing him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orangepeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
27. Trade isn't bad. Unfair trade is bad.
A WTO that doesn't enforce fair trade practices, environmental protections and labor standards is bad. Trade isn't bad. Religion isn't bad. Immigration isn't bad. Hell, guns aren't bad unless they are used badly.

:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #27
36. .They should call it the path to cheap labor. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bensthename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
39. HERE... Read this.. PA blue collar workers not bitter???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC