Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bitter voters speak out.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 01:33 AM
Original message
Bitter voters speak out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 01:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. Pass the Lemonade now, hold the Orange Juice and the Koolaid n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JimGinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 01:53 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I Hope I'm Bitter For Change?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Median Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 01:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. Why Vote Democrat If Not Bitter?
I read comments by people saying that they are optimistic and happy about the direction our country is taking. If this is the case, then why not vote for John McCain who is even more likely to perpetuate the status quo than Hillary Clinton. I mean we are in an unjustified two front war, we are contemplating attacking Iran, the economy is going into the toilet, working class Americans are struggling to make ends meet, yet people are not bitter?

Well, if everyone is so satisfied, and to classify many Americans as bitter is elitist, then why are we bothering voting for a Democrat. You know, it is just a short jump before Hillary/McCain/Bush and Ann Coulter start asking why Obama hates America, and then he is finished as a viable candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 01:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. It's a bit too negative. How about vote from bitter to sweet 08 Obama.
Edited on Sun Apr-13-08 01:55 AM by cooolandrew
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 01:56 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Or bitter sweet symphony Obama 08.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 01:55 AM
Response to Original message
5. Bitter barely begins to describe how I feel but for the first time
in years, I feel hope things may change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Median Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-13-08 01:59 AM
Response to Original message
7. Liberal Elites - Coulter and Clinton
I read the following article that discusses the hypocrisy of the right in complaining about liberal elitists. Interestingly, the description of these privileged conservatives sounds very similar to Hillary's background:

* * *

Hypocrisy of the Right - How Elites Call the Left Elitist
Posted 4/11/2008 8:23 AM CDT
How is it that wealthy, Ivy League educated Republicans call Democrats "liberal elites"? In The Nation this month, Eric Alterman addresses this issue with a little history thrown in. He points out that that particular talking point goes all the way back to 1964 when Ronald Reagan, supporting Goldwater, accused liberals of "an intellectual elite in a far-distant capital can plan our lives for us better than we can plan them ourselves." Nixon spoke of "bureaucratic elite" in his campaign speeches. But it was ethically challenged Spiro Agnew, with speechwriters Pat Buchanan and William Safire, who used the lines, "pusillanimous pussyfooters," "hopeless hysterical hypochondriacs of history," "nattering nabobs of negativism" and "effete corps of impudent snobs," and really got the myth rolling.

Since then, the right wing myth of the "liberal elite" and "cultural elite" has been perpetuated, aligned to undermine "the rest of us". Indeed, the campaign has been effective, but it is hard to figure out what they mean by the term, and it seems all purpose, repeated endlessly on right wing hate radio and Fox Noise. Limbaugh says that his success is a result of "middle America's growing rejection of the elites," defined by him as "professionals" and "experts," including "the medical elites, the sociological elites, the education elites, the legal elites, the science elites...and the ideas this bunch promotes through the media."

But, Alterman points out that conservatives, of course, don't want to do away with elites, just replace them with their own. For example, right wing pundit Laura Ingraham, who wrote an entire book on this subject, grew up in Connecticut, daughter of an attorney, went to Dartmouth and Univeristy of Virginia Law School and now lives in a big house in Washington, D.C. Ann Coulter is another textbook example. She is also a second generation Connecticut lawyer and graduate of Cornell, another IVY LEAGUE college.

One of the funny aspects of the false, "elitist hating" crowd, is that, when given the opportunity to bring in someone from the "real America" to the seats of power, they howled to the roof. That person was Harriet Miers, graduate of SMU's Law School. They all screamed that she had no credentials and that SMU wasn't good enough. Former Bush speechwriter, David Frum, complained, "to take a hazard on anything other than a known quantity of the highest intellectual and personal excellence" was "simply reckless." Another neo-con, Andrew Sullivan said of the nomination, "I'm beginning to think that this appointment was an expression of the president's contempt for the conservative intelligentsia." When Bush caved, and nominated Princeton and Yale educated Sam Alito, all wounds were healed. This after Harvard University and Harvard Law graduate John Roberts had also been confirmed to the court.

I could go on, but you get my drift. Conservative elitists, primarily educated at Ivy League schools, sons and daughters of wealthy east coasters, have successfully turned the word "elite" into a similar negative term like "liberal". It doesn't matter that they are members of the absolute pinnacle of our society. They use this lie, like many others, to put people in social classes to gain power and maintain power.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC