Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Barack Obama would never run a Bosnia-gate hit ad against Hillary Clinton

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
rhombus Donating Member (678 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 06:33 PM
Original message
Barack Obama would never run a Bosnia-gate hit ad against Hillary Clinton
That folks, is the difference between one candidate who is thinking long term about the Democratic Party and victory in November, and another candidate who will do and say anything even at great cost to our party and our chance to defeat McCain.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. No
because he's smart enough to know that's a non-issue that doesn't affect voters. But many here urged him to, though. NOw those same people are pretending to be upset that clinton's running an ad against Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Wrong. He just has too much class. Lying like she did is a MUCH bigger issue than saying
something truthful in a clumsy way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. A picture is worth 1000 words.. You call this class?




I call it what it is: ARROGANCE!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smiley_glad_hands Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. What do you call it when a dem uses republican frames
to attack a fellow dem and damages the party and the progressive movement at the same time? Traitor? Republican? Freeper?

Mind you these aren't just any old republican frames, these are the ones responsible for the mess are country is in now. Denial is not a river in Egypt. Repugs have been dividing the working and middle class since the 60's to the benefit of the true elite in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Practice!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smiley_glad_hands Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. So its true then, Hill will destroy the party in order to win the nomination. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. If thats what it takes to save the country!
so be it!

You are aware the DNC has NEVER WON and election?

And you are aware, the Party never dies?

Good! You've just been promoted to Poly102..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smiley_glad_hands Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. How republican of you. At least you are honest. Disgusting, but honest.
Edited on Mon Apr-14-08 07:35 PM by smiley_glad_hands
On edit, i feel like i've just met karl rove. I need a shower now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #35
41. It's got nothing to do with being Republican..
Or haven't you figured that out yet?

The entire DNC is Supporting Obama...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #31
39. "SIR! ...WE had to destroy the village....
...in order to save the village". :nuke:

Please Hillary, don't try to "save" the Democratic Party.
We'll muddle through.
Go "save" the Republican Party. They NEED you.


"And you are aware, the Party never dies?

Good! You've just been promoted to Poly102.
"---Tellurian


Phone up the Whig Party or the Bull Moose Party.
When you get back to me, YOU will be ready for promotion to Poly103.




"There are forces within the Democratic Party who want us to sound like kinder, gentler Republicans. I want us to compete for that great mass of voters that want a party that will stand up for working Americans, family farmers, and people who haven't felt the benefits of the economic upturn."---Paul Wellstone


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. Oh, my... throwing a tanturm are we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InfiniteNether Donating Member (155 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #13
27. Lol, tool. Is this all you got?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #13
30. Maybe he's smelling something bad....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #13
32. Yes. He has more class in his little finger than Hillary has in her entire body.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhombus Donating Member (678 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. people are rightfully upset with Hillary right now
How is she not damaging a likely nominee? This attack ad is beyond the pale.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. All the attacks on Clinton
thus far have been attacks on a possible nominee. Obama doesn't get immunity by being slightly ahead.

This is politics. Obama said something I'm sure he regrets, and it's being used, properly, against him. She's trying to win. She doesn't owe it to Obama to excuse his fuckups.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhombus Donating Member (678 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. to put up an ad over this? C'mon.
Edited on Mon Apr-14-08 06:46 PM by rhombus
No one is asking that Hillary go soft on Obama or vice versa. The question is -- To what degree are you willing to go to damage your opponent on the Democratic side, who's going to face McCain in the fall?

This ad coming from Hillary is way beyond the pale.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 06:40 PM
Original message
Actually, "snipergate" speaks to Clinton's honesty and judgement.
If she had really just "misspoken" once, as she and Bill claim, I agree...it would be a non-issue.

However, she completely fabricated the story, told it FOUR TIMES, and then lied about the reason for telling it.


Calling her on it is absolutely fair game, in my opinion...and it wouldn't be a "non issue" to a lot of people...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gabeana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. Her lying is a trend its who she is as a politician
that is an issue, but he has too much class
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
34. Integrity and honesty. Non-issues.
Typical pap from a Hillbot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. And that pisses me off...
you can't win by being nice.

If it was me I'd show that sound byte over and over until that heinous witch dropped out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. He would, however, empower his surrogates to play the race card prior to the SC primaries.
:think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
21. You have it back-wards. The Obama campaign doesn't want to go near race baiting
because then he gets labeled the "black candidate". Time and time again, Hillary's campaign has been caught race-baiting and it's been documented each time.

I use to like Hillary until she started the race-baiting crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. .
Edited on Mon Apr-14-08 07:03 PM by Quixote1818
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #6
40. Like Hillary, you have "misremembered".
It was Bill Clinton who played the Race Card in South Carolina.

This correction of your post is FREE.
No Charge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
7. You have got to be kidding.
Edited on Mon Apr-14-08 06:44 PM by cornermouse
:rofl:

He was ridiculing Hillary about her statement that her grandfather took her out behind the barn and taught her to shoot. Those of us who live in the midwest (again) are frequently taught to load and unload a gun, how to aim by a parent and engage in target practice when young whether we go hunting later or not. He's not going to score any brownie points in the midwest on this one either. I'm starting to think he has no idea who he's talking about or to.

In fact, I'll go further. He has "misled" people about his maternal grandmother, about his childhood and poverty, about his experience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arrowhead2k1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. He wasn't demeaning people who use guns at all.
He was mocking Hillary for spewing this story about her shooting a duck in an attempt to impress the blue collar voters like she was one of them. It was transparently laughable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #15
44. I know exactly what he said.
I watched him say it on tv and you're wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
8. what are you smoking? He would do or say anything to beat her.
It is politics, remember.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Why has he not spent more of his VAST war chest on negative ads, then?
He CERTAINLY has the money to do it -- why have we not seen some of
these negative ads on "Hardball" or Fixed Noize or elsewhere? Had
he done them, I'm sure we would have seen them nationally, thanks to
the pundit shows. Haven't seen one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bensthename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. Pull the needle out of your arm. Drugs are bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. so is following false Gods.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
10. Now he should. I don't give a shit anymore. He needs to get fuck her up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. I know just the ad for him to run
"Hillary Clinton says she's against the Columbia Trade deal, but how can she exercise independent judgment on trade when she's benefitted from nearly a million dollars in personal family income from President Clinton promoting that deal? She said she was against it as one of her closest advisors was working with the Columbian Government to pass this damaging trade pact. Hillary says she's not a free trade proponent in spite of her history of promoting NAFTA. Can you trust her?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
14. So maybe MoveOn ought to. I am so fed up with Hillary, I could spit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bensthename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
16. And that is why will voted Obama and never Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
17. I'm beginning to think he should
I'm so pissed at her right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
19. I think the difference is that Obama is not willing to throw anything and everything at Clinton.f
Hillary wants to join herself at the hip with her husband--all of his experiences were evidently hers also (well, most of them), but she cherry picks only the good experiences and disregards anything that is even remotely questionable. I am sure that Obama would have a ton of stuff to bring up if he wanted to do it, but I don't think that he is willing to win at any and all costs.

After Wisconsin, Obama was clearly in a commanding position and on his way to the nomination. It was Clinton who has did and said everything she could, trashing and throwing mud at every opportunity. Obama was faced with either allowing himself to be swiftboated or to answer the charges and to fight back. So I think it is clear that it was Clinton who chose to take the low road in this campaign. They are like 2 quarterbacks competing for the starting position on the same team, but Clinton is willing to break Obama's legs to get the job, even if it hurts the team in the regular season (the general election).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
24. I am an Obama supporter, however Obama must be careful attacking Clinton



and he knows it. He needs Clinton voters in November and if he attacks her too hard he will lose them.

Obama is in between a rock and a hard place. She can attack him constantly and he basically has to take it or let his surrogates attack for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBInMaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #24
37. BULLSHIT ! She drew first blood ! You never, ever allow yourself to get swiftboated!
He hits her in an ad on NAFTA, LOBBYIST $, etc. etc. and knocks this issue right back down her throat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. I agree to a point. It's too bad Hillary is pulling this crap. It is certainly going to
hurt us in November. Clinton and Obama supporters are beginning to despise one another and their candidates with such disdain, there may be no way to patch things up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KaptBunnyPants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
29. Obama would have quit a long time ago.
ANYONE would have quit a long time ago, except for everyone's favorite power couple. Anyone else would have too much respect for the people, and themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tribetime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. I agree for the good of the party...Edwards did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBInMaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
36. Yeah, but he needs to BLAST her as the REAL "elitist" in an ad about NAFTA, Lobbyist $, WalMart, etc
I think she is going to screw herself in the end by overplaying this hand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
43. I disagree
Edited on Mon Apr-14-08 08:44 PM by RiverStone
There come a point in time when you can no longer ignore a bully.

Obama has taken the high road, but Hillary is throwing wild punches and Obama is in a position to deliver a knock out.

This battle needs to end - he has already won - but the MSM wants to keep it going.

If going negative ends it and allows the healing to begin, millions of dollars and volunteer hours to be saved - and our focus to shift to the GE - do it!

Enough already!

In fact, I suggested fighting her negative PA ad with:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=5505814&mesg_id=5505814



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-14-08 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
45. He could rub her face in that and NAFTA.
But he won't. He has run a spectacular campaign and doesn't need to match her ugly with more ugly. He just tells the truth and, so far, she hasn't quite grasped what's hit her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC