|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-16-08 02:10 PM Original message |
Question for Obama supporters... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DJ13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-16-08 02:14 PM Response to Original message |
1. Because the DNC didnt allocate enough delegates for a tight, long race |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-16-08 02:18 PM Response to Reply #1 |
8. I think the amount is fair |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DarienComp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-16-08 02:14 PM Response to Original message |
2. Because Hillary's a tenacious campaigner. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-16-08 02:19 PM Response to Reply #2 |
9. Ummm... in this case, they are BOTH behind |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DarienComp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-16-08 02:25 PM Response to Reply #9 |
18. Sure, they're both below 2025. Hillary just below by more. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crispini (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-16-08 02:26 PM Response to Reply #9 |
20. Oh, I hope not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-16-08 03:25 PM Response to Reply #20 |
31. That is not so... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crispini (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-16-08 03:45 PM Response to Reply #31 |
36. It happened to *both* parties for years and years. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-16-08 04:05 PM Response to Reply #36 |
38. My dog's droppings could win against McCain in the GE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crispini (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-16-08 05:04 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. See, maybe I'm just a fraidycat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteppingRazor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-16-08 02:14 PM Response to Original message |
3. Because Hillary's won them? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bensthename (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-16-08 02:16 PM Response to Original message |
4. Because this damn thing takes too long. But he will first. I bet my house on it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpridx (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-16-08 02:16 PM Response to Original message |
5. Why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigwillq (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-16-08 02:17 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. But he still hasn't won the nomination yet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-16-08 02:20 PM Response to Reply #5 |
12. Good first post! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Windy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-16-08 02:18 PM Response to Original message |
7. A recent poll conducted in Michigan found that if people voted today, Barack would beat HRC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-16-08 02:22 PM Response to Reply #7 |
14. Polls don't mean a thing these days |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-16-08 02:19 PM Response to Original message |
10. Because he's running against the entire Clinton machine. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-16-08 02:19 PM Response to Original message |
11. Because when the contest started, people felt they knew HIllary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-16-08 02:23 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. I think you're right... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slick8790 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-16-08 02:20 PM Response to Original message |
13. Because he had to fight against the massive Clinton machine, plus the media thumping the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-16-08 02:23 PM Response to Original message |
15. Because the DLC/Clinton machine has a lot of clout, and sewed up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Egnever (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-16-08 02:25 PM Response to Original message |
17. Cause as bad as Hillary is she is still loved by many. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ej510 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-16-08 02:28 PM Response to Reply #17 |
22. Because Hillary had the name advantage and the establishment which gave her the upper hand. but..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheDoorbellRang (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-16-08 02:25 PM Response to Original message |
19. Because it's a close race: 52.2% vs. 47.8% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scheming daemons (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-16-08 02:27 PM Response to Original message |
21. Because he entered the race as an underdog with little name recognition.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RiverStone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-16-08 02:57 PM Response to Reply #21 |
27. Yes... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CakeGrrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-16-08 02:32 PM Response to Original message |
23. Because people are sticking with HRC for several reasons, IMO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-16-08 02:33 PM Response to Original message |
24. Because "screw 'em" only just broke. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uponit7771 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-16-08 02:34 PM Response to Original message |
25. He doesn't want to, Dem registation has doubled in places were Hillary and Obama campaign |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoesTo11 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-16-08 02:43 PM Response to Original message |
26. Patience, only 82% of pledged delegates elected |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dbmk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-16-08 03:02 PM Response to Original message |
28. I'll play |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dchill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-16-08 03:31 PM Response to Reply #28 |
35. You make a LOT of good points! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stillcool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-16-08 03:04 PM Response to Original message |
29. Why didn't John Edwards?.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-16-08 03:05 PM Response to Original message |
30. in the democratic party there are no winner take all primaries |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Milo_Bloom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-16-08 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
32. Media/establishment is helping to keep Clinton alive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dchill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-16-08 03:27 PM Response to Original message |
33. Because of Hillary Clinton. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-16-08 03:30 PM Response to Original message |
34. Because we represent votes proportionally. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-16-08 03:54 PM Response to Original message |
37. He's winning. There's really know way to accurately answer your |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Apr 24th 2024, 04:34 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC