Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

for Matthews misogyny pays

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
wrando Donating Member (949 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 06:12 AM
Original message
for Matthews misogyny pays
it's that old tingling up his leg

http://mediamatters.org/columns/200804160002?f=h_column

bill from ct
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 06:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. Media Matters nails the sexism of the chattering class. Here's more from a wealth of great points.
- snip-

Matthews is hot because he dumps all over Hillary Clinton, saying rude, sexist, and demeaning things about her week after week, and the Beltway media crowd thinks its edgy and insightful and loves to watch. (As the Times noted, "Some of most devoted followers are Washington media figures.") Matthews, desperate for attention and approval, sees that media elites love his sexist shtick so he lays it on thicker and thicker. Media elites then turn around and anoint him the Hot Journalist.

For Matthews, his boorish behavior is simply an outgrowth of his profession as a Clinton-hater. His television career was first built on obsessive disdain for Bill Clinton during the impeachment years. That pattern of contempt extended into Matthews' gruesome, dishonest attacks on Al Gore in 2000 (he would "lick the floor" to be president, Matthews used to joke), and has now continued with his 2008 coverage, which is laced with sexist commentary.

But if he says wildly offensive and sexist things on the air, why isn't Matthews shunned instead of toasted? Why would the so-called liberal New York Times lavish so much attention on him?

Simple: The press plays dumb about the misogyny, and the Times magazine article was a perfect example. (The political press hates the word misogyny and considers the idea to be cuckoo. Click here to watch Keith Olbermann jump down Elton John's throat for even daring to utter the word in the context of the Clinton campaign.)

- snip -
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Medusa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:26 AM
Response to Original message
2. Olbermann & Scarborough and the rest also suffer from the same ailment.
I seldom watch them anymore, it was so blatant and so obvious I just got sick of it. But God forbid you mention anything negative about Olbermann on this board, I actually had a couple of his fans jump me one night when I dared criticize him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wrando Donating Member (949 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Olbermann
Olbermann is probably the biggest disappointment. He's a smart guy, but his show is totally predictable and a bore. He trots out the same 4 or 5 guests each night and then makes fun of O'reilly. The ladder is like making fun of the retarded, only the retarded have much bigger hearts. Let's not forget Olbermann's first half hour is dedicated to smearing Hillary no matter what contorted logic he feels necessary to employ. His once promising show is now unwatchable.

bill from ct
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:52 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I am heartbroken about Olbermann. Yes he's smart, but you're right: his show is totally predictable
and boring.

What a loss for the progressive community. His Hillary hating is so sexist and unprofessional. It's just sickening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Agreed
But we still have Stephen Colbert. He still rants well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wrando Donating Member (949 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Colbert
Colbert is amazingly funny, he actually becomes his character. I'm afraid Olbermann has become Colbert's parody.

bill from ct
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. He used to focus on O'Reilly
Now he has two blowhard windbags to choose from. KO does the prep work for Colbert's writers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wrando Donating Member (949 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. off subject
this has gotten off the subject of the article

Eric does some excellent work

bill from ct
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Olbermann has joined the rest of the media pack that Tweety is emblematic of.
Clinton-bashing, sexism - par for the course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wrando Donating Member (949 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. double standard
Can you imagine the outrage if Matthews or any of them used such condescending remarks to describe Obama?

Every tiny negative remark against Obama takes on a racial meaning.

Well get ready because the repubs are not so dainty, they will play the race card, and from the bottom of the deck.

bill from ct
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC