Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The only surprise from the debate last night: Clinton endorsing Reagan's Social Security Commission

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
izzybeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:52 AM
Original message
The only surprise from the debate last night: Clinton endorsing Reagan's Social Security Commission
Edited on Thu Apr-17-08 07:53 AM by izzybeans
Everything else was predictable. We all could have predicted the irrelevance of the first 3/4 of the debate and we know their positions on issues.

I literally spit my water out laughing when she endorsed the Reagan solution. I mean after all the boohooing about Obama lumping Reagan in with two other Democratic presidents' penchant for diplomacy, where's all the faux outrage from the Clinton camp. Oh wait...never-mind. Don't question the Goddess of Peace, she's infallible. Nice choice of words there by the way. The Goddess of Peace. :rofl: Does that make her the Prince of Peace's mother? I suppose Chelsea's birth resulted from an immaculate conception. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. I think Hillary would endorse Satan if she thought it would get her votes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzybeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
2. Did anyone actually watch the debate?
Or are you just arguing over soundbites? :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crispini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. I think most people are annoyed over the moderation
and the Clinton people are telling them, "Neener neener" and so most of the board is falling into that trap.

I wish I had some threads left, I'd go post some substantive stuff, as it is I guess I'll just have to kick it. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzybeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. I wouldn't even bother with substance here. We should start each substantive thread with
Edited on Thu Apr-17-08 08:23 AM by izzybeans
"Let it sink" in the title just to get people to open it.

And to be ironic about our intentions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crispini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. Hee! You're right about that! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crispini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
3. Quote.
"CLINTON: Well, in fact, I am totally committed to making sure Social Security is solvent. If we had stayed on the path we were on at the end of my husband's administration, we sure would be in a lot better position, because we had a plan to extend the life of the Social Security Trust Fund and, again, President Bush decided that that wasn't a priority, that the war in Iraq and tax cuts for the wealthiest of Americans were his priorities, neither of which he's ever paid for.

I think it's the first time we've ever been taken to war and had a president who wouldn't pay for it.

But when it comes to Social Security, fiscal responsibility is the first and most important step. You've got to begin to rein in the budget, pay as you go, to try to replenish our Social Security Trust Fund.

And, with all due respect, the last time we had a crisis in Social Security was 1983. President Reagan and Speaker Tip O'Neill came up with a commission. That was the best and smartest way, because you've got to get Republicans and Democrats together. That's what I will do."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzybeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yep that's the quote.
Edited on Thu Apr-17-08 08:17 AM by izzybeans
Shhh...I agree with the "you've got to get together part"...

The only thing she danced around was whether she agreed with raising the payroll tax like that commission did. All she did say was that raising the tax on higher wage earners was not progressive, whatever that means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crispini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. I ... um... don't remember Reagan's social security commission.
Was it awful?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzybeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Nope.
Edited on Thu Apr-17-08 08:21 AM by izzybeans
Just wondered were all the outrage over Reagan was.

I suppose it was what it was, then...so I suppose we are supposed to say it worked. But By today's standards it would be political suicide. Raising the payroll tax. And we don't have sensible republicans to deal with. The commission would be forced to consider giving our money away to wall street.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crispini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. Oh, I get it. Obama praises Reagan and gets dinged....
Clinton praises Reagan, nobody cares.

You're totally right about "we don't have sensible republicans to deal with" but I do think they know SS is the third rail. Back when I had a republican representative I went to a SS town hall out in rural east Texas. Remember Shrub's "privatize Social Security" initiative?" Even the Republican County Commissioner ripped our Republican House Representative a new one! Boy, that went down like a lead balloon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunkerbuster1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. The results were A-ok.
And Social Security IS FUCKING SOLVENT as a result.

Lying assholes continue to claim that the trust fund is "bankrupt." It's "bankrupt" because we've been deficit-spending year after year and claiming the trust fund against the deficit.

Basically, SS has been paying its own way all along. Don't believe otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzybeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Exactly.
Edited on Thu Apr-17-08 08:22 AM by izzybeans
Kick this post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunkerbuster1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. And to be totally fair, Clinton indulged in this practice too
Claimed we were in balance when we weren't, not quite, yet.

I know on a certain level revenues are revenues, and FICA taxes get shoved in the same pot, but it IS accounted for, there are T-bills that are supposed to be as good as the full faith and credit of the government, and anyone who doesn't believe in that full faith and credit shouldn't be allowed to hold office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzybeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. I'm worried that when it comes up people are going to be scared into giving their money away.
Both of our candidates understand these things. It remains to be seen whether they will have the political will to standup to the interests trying to pry open the collective pocketbook.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunkerbuster1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. Hey, a few months back, Obama uttered the magic word:
"Single Payer." As in, that'd be the most efficient healthcare delivery system.

These people get it. I have every confidence that either candidate will opt to treat us like adults about this fiscal stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzybeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. I am confident as well.
First time in a long while I can say so. We have good candidates. I hope we don't destroy them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crispini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. Got it!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 06:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC