Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Can someone please tell me why Obama's performance was so terrible?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 06:55 PM
Original message
Can someone please tell me why Obama's performance was so terrible?
Edited on Thu Apr-17-08 06:59 PM by Cant trust em
He was clearly getting pounded with BS questioning by Gibson and Stephanapoulos and was deflecting their attacks pretty well based on the circumstances. There was nothing in the content of his answers that was bad. I admit that debates aren't his strongest suit and that he usually is somewhat hesitant in his answers. But I felt like he nailed it pretty well several times by saying, essentially, that the American people are smarter than they are being given credit for. While not his best, the performance was far from the abysmal display that some people on here are trying to make it out to be.

If the debate was so bad, then I want to hear some specifics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. It wasn't -- it was actually excellent
My brother-in-law (military, leaning McCain) is now voting for Obama because of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Seriously?
Good news! :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
32. I kind of agree. It allowed us to see the true character and integrity
(or lack thereof) of each of the candidates: Hillary, while strong and confident for the first time in a while, did not show Americans that she can be trusted. Meanwhile, Obama, even though he was attacked relentless, showed us, once again, who he really is. From the comments I thought he was crucified, but after watching it myself, I think Obama won. Honestly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Window Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
33. Wonderful!
I think people are fed up with Hillary and her negativity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. It was terrible because Hillary did not lie about Bosnia...
and the same people that defended her on those comments are now claiming a knockout in this debate. As her poll numbers continue to tank? It's almost like, "I broke his fist with my nose.."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Did Obama mention Bosnia? I don't recall that.
Perhaps you are confusing candidates. However, I distinctly recall Sen. Clinton joining in on the Bitter Gate and William Ayers pile-on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. Big ups to Obama for letting her Bosnia comments slide
He could have reamed her on it like she was trying to do to him, but he let it go on another Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #15
27. A fact that seems to be lost on the HRC supporter I responded to.
Every attack on Clinton is his fault.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #27
34. You should read kentuck's post again
I think it's sarcastic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. Ah, I think you are right. Must read more carefully.
:spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #27
43. To Clinton supporters that would be a weakness
You mean he didn't rip another democrat's heart out and show it to her while it was still bleeding? How's he ever going to stand up to the same exact treatment from the right-wing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticalAmazon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
30. Hillary proved that the only way she can win against Obama is by FRAUD. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GarbagemanLB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. He stumbled a bit, but it wasn't terrible, like some Hillary supporters would make you believe. He
had some good comebacks when Hillary AND the ABC hosts would jump on him, and he did pretty well overall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. I listened to the debate on radio first and THEN watched it
While listening, I thought he did really well -- only when I watched
it did I think that he LOOKED tired and somewhat lackluster. His words
were good, but the visuals ... Of COURSE HRC was going to look more
ebullient since she had Georgie and Charlie helping her beat up on
Barack ... but I think especially his comebacks about Bill C. par-
doning Weather Underground members and her own '92 "cookie" statement
were really effective. I agree that it wasn't terrible, but I think
many people were hoping he'd get into the gutter with her and when
he didn't, they were disappointed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. the cookie baking thing was excellent
I'm biased, but I felt like his answers were good. He really got after the tabloid media idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
20. I didn't think he looked tired so much as he looked supremely frustrated and annoyed.
And with good reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. Agreed ... annoyed like most of us who were watching
Not leaping over his podium and throttling those two
sad excuses for "moderators" probably required a LOT
of patience on his part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthlover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #25
38. I was thinking of that this morning driving to work....
Obama really is a decent guy. If it had been me, I would have been tempted to get really ugly at the moderators. But Obama kept his cool, even showed some class. He had a wide open opportunity to bash Hillary about Bosnia, especially when she made the excuse that she was tired. He could have asked her if she would be too tired at 3AM to answer the phone....but he basically let her off the hook. I know if the roles were reversed, Hillary would not hesitate to bash. That is one thing we know she enjoys,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. He tried SO hard to get them to move on to issues ...
and after a while, he probably just wanted to yank off his mic and leave ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #38
42. He let the Bosnia thing slide because he's a good democrat
He knows that we all lose by busting it out for the lie that it is. He's a better person than I am.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lojasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. Clintonista spin. EOM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticalAmazon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
8. It wasn't,. He was outnumbered 3:1, and he performed very, very well. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texas Hill Country Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. ummm...not, uhhh, really.... I... uh, dont think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticalAmazon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #13
29. Staphylococcolus, Gibson and Hillary against Obama = 3:1....
...and that's the only way Hillary can win: by fraud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texas Hill Country Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. read here....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #9
24. as I said, it wasn't a sparkling debate
Edited on Thu Apr-17-08 07:07 PM by Cant trust em
but there's no way it was as bad as that column portrayed it to be. Most importantly, it's tough to sound impressive when you're answering questions about flag pins, 40 year old radicalism, and if your reverend loves America enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticalAmazon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:18 PM
Original message
It was a FRAUDULENT debate, the only kind Hillary can win against Obama. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticalAmazon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #24
31. It was a FRAUDULENT debate, the only kind Hillary can win against Obama. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
featherman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
10. It wasn't
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progdog Donating Member (435 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
11. It wasn't
The pundits just want folks to think it was. They want to portray him as wimpy. I'll say it again, they are irresponsible fools.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
12. I thought he did really well and especially was presidential in his cool & calm demeanor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tribetime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
16. I thought he was fine ...I thought the questions were from the
Jerry Springer Show. The only ones who didn't think he performed well wouldn't vote for him anyway. If anything I think people will see thru this and how much he's been attacked non-stop since mid Feb. Watch the polls stay the same or even give him a little bounce in the next few days. People aren't as stupid as what the MSM thinks they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
watrwefitinfor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #16
41. Please don't insult Jerry Springer.
:hi:

In fact, I caught a little of Maury this afternoon, and got the impression he and Jerry would have had much better, more intelligent questions than the two bozos from ABC.

Wat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RazBerryBeret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
17. I thought he did pretty well,
He had some great lines and comebacks. I did think he looked a little pissed a couple times, which I thought might hurt him...but she had some crazy grin on her face the whole time with shifty eyes when she answered the first few questions....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthlover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #17
39. Hillary's eyes looked up into the sky at times....looked wierd to me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JBoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 09:12 PM
Original message
I noticed that too. She wasn't making eye contact with anyone!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JBoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #39
46. I noticed that too. She wasn't making eye contact with anyone!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BobRossi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
18. He is just a kid.
No real-world experience. I truely wish he would have waited 2 more election cycles, I think he has the makings of a great leader but he is just not ready.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky 13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #18
37. Are you being serious?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greguganus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
19. He did fine. It's just the Hillbots with fake tears in their eyes that can't see the truth. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
21. Cause the M$M says so
that's why. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoesTo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
22. Because he was forced to defend Wright and flag pins and bitter
True, this was inevitable, given that these were the questions that Steph and Gibson prepared. But some of the soundbytes in MSM news seem to be that he struggled simply because these topics were discussed. This isn't logical, but it's some of the spin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ksoze Donating Member (635 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
23. he did not have his cheering audience with him
he is probably a really good guy, but his shock over being asked questions he did not want to answer took him off his footing for the rest of the debate. If he does that in the GE with the rethugs, we are hosed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinkpops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
26. As of late last nite Stephanapoulos was saying there was no
sure "winner". Today the ABC spin is that it was bad for Obama. I think he did very well. Most of Clinton's scunge is probably behind her, with resurection of old stuff expected in the GE, so all they had to throw at her was the trustworthiness such as snipergate.

Mostly it was a non-event, but the excerpts will no doubt be replayed over and over by various interests to influence whomever lets them do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
28. HIs performance wasn't terrible.
It wasn't his best but it was still far better then Hillary's performance in any of the debates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky 13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
36. He STAMMERED!!
He seemed to lose his focus a bit, said eh, ah, um. You know... stammering. It means you lost, apparently.

What really happened:
The lights came up, the debate started, and Barack realizes he's just walked in to an ambush.

On a live nationally televised Presidential Interrogation...er.... Debate.

That's some serious motherfucking pressure.

He coulda freaked out. I would have. I would have shouted, "This is bullshit!" , kicked over the podium and stormed off.

But not our guy.

He withstood it. He answered every question. Took every punch. And all he did was stammer.

THAT'S the man I want making some decisions around here.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoof Hearted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
44. Uh. . .. uhhhh. . .uh.. .. I .... I...I. . . I ... . .uh.. ... .. I . . . uh.. . .uh...uhhhhh
I dunno.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBInMaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
45. He was poised and held his own just fine. MANY answers were very good. He did fine !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
47. His performance was fine but tell me he didnt say no more debates, please
That is going to cost him so much in the general it is not funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #47
50. I didn't get that.
Did you read this somewhere?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
48. It wasn't.
He did fine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NC_Nurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
49. The debate moderators were terrible. It's just sad to see the MSM sink to
such depths. If this is the kind of crap they're going to talk about, I'd just as soon not have any more debates.
He can debate McCain in the GE. Maybe they can leave ABC off the list of hosts. They absolutely suck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC