Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Barack Obama Says “No” to Future Debates… Who Won? Recap POLL

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
politicallore Donating Member (713 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 11:56 AM
Original message
Barack Obama Says “No” to Future Debates… Who Won? Recap POLL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. American watchers lost and did legitimate journalism
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. "Should Hillary Clinton Drop Out?"
From the source...

Yes (72%, 617 Votes)
No (15%, 129 Votes)
Obama Should (13%, 107 Votes)
Total Voters: 853

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoldieAZ49 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. if you can't take the heat stay out of politics!
weak elitist

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Don't forget that Clinton has lost several debates

She got spanked in a couple of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoldieAZ49 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. And she didn't quit - she can take the heat
big difference


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #8
27. She can take the heat in the same way Joe Lieberman can
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoldieAZ49 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. ah yes, good ole Joe
the dem party black balled him and the people of CT voted for him anyway.

The "dem" candidate lost, remember?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Awsi Dooger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
20. Your header is deliciously ironic
Several? Among about 24? I'll take that percentage.

Again, the math seems to be coddled except when it doesn't favor Obama. He's fared erratically in debates and debates figure to be decisive in a general election within a cycle with one party holding power exactly 2 straight terms. That's the history, debates in '60, '76 and '00 shaping the outcome, if not reversing what would have evolved minus the debates. This is hardly '04, when one side had an incumbency edge and the debates weren't enough to nullify it.

Whether or not Obama takes more debates against Hillary, he damn sure needs to tighten and improve his debating skills for the fall. I would think a one-on-one primary debate late in the cycle would be the closest and most relevant approximation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 12:06 PM
Original message
Winning Candidate.
Democratic Nominee Barack Obama.

He has risen despite facing the CLinton Machine and the RW smear Machine at the same time.

If Clinton will ever leave the stage with her loss, Obama will grow stronger against the RW smear machine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoldieAZ49 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
10. when did he get 2025 delegates? hmmm
he is not the nominee

McCain is leading in most national polls, should we just declare him the POTUS?

Hope you can understand
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
24. Polls do not equal vote tallies.
Edited on Sat Apr-19-08 02:25 PM by tekisui
Obama needs ONLY 80 more Superdelegates, and half the remaining PD's to lock it.

Hillary needs 65% of the PD's and 275+ of the remaining Supers. It's not gonna happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #10
25. It's 2024 now that they need to obtain
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. Thank You Sen. Obama
the only network left w/o a debate is CBS - the thought of Katie moderating is frightening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
5. She just wants to drag him down regardless of herself being dragged down.
She can't continue to drag Obama down. She obviously could care less if she drags herself down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bensthename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. She hasn't earned another debate.. Her GOP antics are too costly on national TV..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
9. The CC is almost broke
and they are trying any and every ploy they can think of to try and keep her on TV. You could actually SEE her reading what she wanted to say in her head. It was like she KNEW her answers ahead of time and I'm willing to bet anyone here that she absolutely DOES have a photographic memory-my wife saw it first, the way her eyes were moving back and forth. It's either that or she really IS in-fucking-sane
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlaGranny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. I'd be willing to bet
that she WAS in on it. The Ayers thing was an obvious set-up. She had to have known it was coming up as it was probably something she had no prior knowledge of. I'm torn between wanting Obama to use the same tactics as she does and not wanting him to lower himself to that kind of dirty politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
11. This won't work well for him. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. I wish I had a list of predictions such as this one. The DU pundit class - always wrong, loudly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. It's a papier-mâché reality
... something for cartoonish minds and gnashing teeth. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frustratedlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
12. I voted in the side poll about Hillary dropping out of the race...
and it wouldn't accept my vote...said I'd already voted. Never been on that website in my life!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicallore Donating Member (713 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #12
26. Somebody sure has been... And if you had a choice of what to vote for... Then You already voted...
Once you vote... You only see the results... my guess is you clicked vote twice.

The poll is accurate, it takes a few seconds for your vote to be logged... but thats it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
13. Hillary said no to an earlier debate in NC. Why should he accept one on HER terms?
Edited on Sat Apr-19-08 12:42 PM by jenmito
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
16. NO MORE DEBATES, unless they are moderated by Bill Moyers or someone in his league.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
18. Good for him....
I much prefer he do town halls and answer the questions that people have, than playing in the sandbox with the elite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whatchamacallit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
19. If debates are so stupid and fucked up that nobody wants to watch, what's the point in having them?
Maybe Hill supporters like this tabloid bullshit, but the rest of us have about had it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicallore Donating Member (713 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #19
29. I guarantee people from Penn. were watching.
I guarantee people from Penn. were watching.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
21. There will be no need for any more primary debates.
The superdelegates come aboard after PA, and the nomination is settled.

What the Obama campaign DOES need to do, is to look ahead to the debates in the fall against Grandpa McLoon. Usually there are three of them. No doubt FAUX will insist on at least one. They should only agree to debating on FAUX, if the moderators are NOT employees of Rupert Murdoch. Needless to say, Charles Gibson and Snuffleupagus have disqualified themselves.

Overall, they should insist that at least one of the debates, preferably ALL of them, are REAL debates, sponsored by the League of Women Voters or some other non-partisan group, discussing ACTUAL issues, and not fucking lapel pins or other irrelevant horseshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crankychatter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
22. Clinton associated herself with the attackers and lost credibility
Edited on Sat Apr-19-08 02:11 PM by crankychatter
people remember the right wing attack machine of 2000 and 2004

we had a nearly visceral reaction

they attacked her too... in an unfair way... perhaps not as much

BUT she associated herself WITH the attack...

She overestimated the virtue and utility of those tactics

and UNDERESTIMATED the intelligence of Democrats

Obama did well, although understandably shaken and not his best performance ever...

but he WON

we'll find out in PA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
23. Fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
cking whore? Not Hillary, you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicallore Donating Member (713 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #23
32. who are we fuuuuing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
28. Works for me.
After 21 debates, I don't think I could sit through another. It's rather pointless at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicallore Donating Member (713 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. One on One debates... count more for me though... I figure they should just invite McCain too, lol..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC