Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is anyone watching Press The Meat?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 08:25 AM
Original message
Is anyone watching Press The Meat?
Obama's campaign director is pwning Clinton's


discuss amongst yourselves
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. its not on here for another 40 mins
is it worth tuning in for?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. oh yes, Axelrod comes out swinging and Hill's guy cant look anyone in the eye
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. So slimeball Penn's replacement is a dud? How can we trust her to run the country...
given how ineptly she's run her campaign?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. he got asked about Moveon and choked
competent, he is not. If Hillary picks people like this to run her campaign, I'd be scared of her Cabinet

Enjoy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vanje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #9
53. Hes a dud
On some tough questions, Clinton's guy says, "I've only been working on the campain a few weeks".

He repeatedly passes up chances to defend his boss, and her campaign, and defends himself instead.

Pretty weak.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ORDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #53
57. He really said that? On national TV??? OMG!!! If this is the best she
can come up with she's in a world of hurt.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScarletSniper Donating Member (699 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
11. 40 minutes here too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lisa58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. it's not on here for another hour...
...is it worth watching?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasLady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
4. thanks for that teaser! I am definitely going to watch it now
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oviedodem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
5. You can't be anymore right; Penn at least does a better job. This new guy said some crazy stuff like
Edited on Sun Apr-20-08 08:30 AM by oviedodem
"Iran is the biggest threat to the middle east".

Now if that does not sound like EXACTLY what the republicans said about Iraq AND now what they are saying about Iran. Folks wake up she is a DLC republican in sheep's clothing.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Don't forget Lieberman; that's been his battle cry of late, too. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. oh yeah, she is neo-con or neo lib or whatever it is
this is what she said during the debate

SENATOR CLINTON: Well, in fact, George, I think that we should be looking to create an umbrella of deterrence that goes much further than just Israel. Of course I would make it clear to the Iranians that an attack on Israel would incur massive retaliation from the United States, but I would do the same with other countries in the region.

You know, we are at a very dangerous point with Iran. The Bush policy has failed. Iran has not been deterred. They continue to try to not only obtain the fissile material for nuclear weapons but they are intent upon and using their efforts to intimidate the region and to have their way when it comes to the support of terrorism in Lebanon and elsewhere.

And I think that this is an opportunity, with skillful diplomacy, for the United States to go to the region and enlist the region in a security agreement vis-a-vis Iran. It would give us three tools we don't now have.

Number one, we've got to begin diplomatic engagement with Iran, and we want the region and the world to understand how serious we are about it. And I would begin those discussions at a low level. I certainly would not meet with Ahmadinejad, because even again today he made light of 9/11 and said he's not even sure it happened and that people actually died. He's not someone who would have an opportunity to meet with me in the White House. But I would have a diplomatic process that would engage him.

And secondly, we've got to deter other countries from feeling that they have to acquire nuclear weapons. You can't go to the Saudis or the Kuwaitis or UAE and others who have a legitimate concern about Iran and say: Well, don't acquire these weapons to defend yourself unless you're also willing to say we will provide a deterrent backup and we will let the Iranians know that, yes, an attack on Israel would trigger massive retaliation, but so would an attack on those countries that are willing to go under this security umbrella and forswear their own nuclear ambitions.

And finally we cannot permit Iran to become a nuclear weapons power. And this administration has failed in our efforts to convince the rest of the world that that is a danger, not only to us and not just to Israel but to the region and beyond.

Therefore we have got to have this process that reaches out, beyond even who we would put under the security umbrella, to get the rest of the world on our side to try to impose the kind of sanctions and diplomatic efforts that might prevent this from occurring.



Watch this - 2 minutes into the video is when they begin discussing it
http://youtube.com/watch?v=fCd-LsG9820&feature=related
http://youtube.com/watch?v=yMA-_RP1Z_Q&feature=related

Hell, Pat Buchanan picks up on it and the insanity of it (or the unconstitutionality of it).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
6. No, but I will be in 1/2 hour. Sounds good. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
7. I live in NYC and the only thing on here is the Pope at ground zero. It's bad enough he ties up....
traffic all day and I can't get anywhere, but now he's taking up my TV.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScarletSniper Donating Member (699 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. lol ouch..I send my sympathy..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. That's it. I've had enough. I'm moving next door to the Clintons. After Hillary loses this.......
primary it will be nice quiet neighborhood as they disappear into obscurity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DangerousRhythm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #7
34. Ugh.
If you can't catch the show later, it's always available to download free on iTunes, in case you didn't already know!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
15. I have to say
I like this guy much better than Mark Penn-who was a slimeball
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
a kennedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
16. Love that Press the Meat....
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
17. OMG on second thought this Geoff Garin
really isn't a very good spokesman...Tim pressing him on Iran-will she send our troops if Iran attacked the Saudis, or Jordan....answer? stuttering and no answer-Iran the biggest threat? Sounds a lot like McCain to me-sounds like more fucking war is top priority
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #17
56. He's a weak spokesman
and it shows
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
18. Best thing said was the last statement by Garin
on which Axelrod agreed-DEMOCRATIC UNITY IN NOVEMBER!!!!!! UNITY people...we are democrats all
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
19. Poor Geoff, he really is pretty bad. I almost feel sorry for him.
Getting his feet wet on Meet the Press was probably not a good move.

Especially going up against someone like Axelrod.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
20. "Did you not put on a 100% negative ad against Senator Obama in Philadelphia?"
"No we did not."

"Yes, you did. Go back and check with your people."

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
21. Just flipped the TV on to see this.. ouchie. Garin doesn't sound like a believer in his candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #21
24. He really does sound like he is laboring to support Clinton.
His answers are pretty tortured.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
22. Halperin's take on this sit-down -
Meet the Press: Obama’s Axelrod and Clinton’s Garin debated almost every current political issue with respectful intensity. Axelrod skillfully took a question about the apparent gap between Obama’s rhetoric on running a positive campaign and his campaign’s negative tactics and put Garin on the defensive on NAFTA. Garin then got enmeshed in a series of weak moments involving Clinton’s honesty and Mark Penn. Garin on several occasions begged off answering questions, citing his newness to the campaign and/or his unfamilarity with the details of her policy positions.

http://thepage.time.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. reminde me a lot
of the Bush administration-with the "I'm not responsible, it's the guy who was here's fault" answers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ice-9 Donating Member (141 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #22
59. Halperin's take is spot-on (see also #58) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
23. Like others have said, it's not on here yet.
I love that these shows air at different times though. The summations other DUers provide help me decide whether it's worth my time to watch. Thanks, I'll definitely be tuning in! :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #23
27. one thing is for sure
ABC's This Week with Stephanie will NOT be watched...David Brooks is shameless and pretty much despicable on this show
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #27
30. I'm hoping someone will be brave and provide us with a recap.
I, too, am done with that show and Georgie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #30
37. and I ripped off an E-mail a little while ago Tatiana
telling them that This Week with Georgie has come and gone and that I did NOT watch like I said I wouldn't and will not watch again EVER
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #27
38. I can't speak for others, but nothing could make me watch This Wanker,
with George Snuffleupyerass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
26. This is a good discussion. If only these issues were covered in the last debate with the candidates.
Edited on Sun Apr-20-08 09:19 AM by Tatiana
They are talking about things that matter to the voters and the American people.

Changing Washington, special interests, health care, Iran, the economy, NAFTA...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. yea an actual debate
go figure
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
29. "The problem is that Senator Clinton speaks her MINDS."
"She usually has two positions on these issues."

:rofl:

Ouch!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DangerousRhythm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #29
33. That was a great line, ahaha.
I love these two duking it out. Ooh, the Move On audio clip now...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aaronbees Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #29
35. Love that line
Garin really seems in over his head here. But at least it's a civil, intense discussion. Nice to see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #35
42. That and the "THAT is what your negative ad was about" and "go check with your people"
Clinton guy acts clueless about negative ad and then quotes it verbatim a minute later. Obama rep calls him on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aaronbees Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #42
45. Axelrod is really tough
And thinks quickly on his feet.

Looks like Obama had the beer drinkers' vote ... need to improve the bowlers' vote. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
31. Just tuning in. Good stuff :)
Wait I take that back. Now Russert is bringing up the patriotic crap :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DangerousRhythm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
32. Haha, I call it that too...
And I am. Obama's campaign guy just made me laugh out loud when he was asking Clinton's guy about Mark Penn... why did he have to leave if it wasn't a bad thing? His expression as Clinton Guy explained and stammered through his reasons just cracked me up. Great stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
36. This proves that you can sit two people with opposing interests and positions in the same room
and have a substantive, passionate, intense, yet RESPECTFUL and informative discussion on the issues people care about.

Charlie and Georgie should be ashamed of themselves when Timmeh the Consummate Washington Elitist proves to be a better journalist and moderator than either of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #36
49. Charlie and Georgie set the bar so low
Timmeh said "hey, it looks like I can jump over that one!"

after all they had to dig a friggin' TRENCH before they could even put the bar that low...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #49
52. That's exactly what happened!
The shameful conduct by Gibson and Stephanopoulos is going to have some ramifications in the media, which could turn out to be a good thing.

Normally, I rarely watch MTP unless I have a good idea of what Timmeh I will get. There's Gotcha!Timmeh and then there's Puff!Timmeh, who lobs softballs at conservative guests like Condi Rice. But neither showed up today. It was almost as if he said to himself, "If I just do a decent job sticking to the important issues as moderator, I'm going to look way better than that those ABC clowns."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
39. "I've only been here for 2 weeks, that comment was made before..."
Nice disclaimer. Sorry, guy, you get the whole fucking package not just 2 weeks worth.


He kind of reminds me of Elmer Fudd minus the hunting hat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #39
44. No kidding - what the heck?
Her opinion has changed now that her campaign has a new talking head on the tee vee :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
40. Brooks' phony hand-wringing is tiresome.
He thinks Obama should give a speech on "class" now, given Bittergate. Oh, and he says Obama should re-give the speech on religion that he gave a few years ago.

Brooks demands more Obama speeches!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
41. Garin (New Clinton guy) stammers and is hard to follow. Tit for tat.
Basically, he's all about more bottom feeding. More 7th grade miniscule petty irrevelencies. "Obama's people are nasty."

Obama's guy is easy to follow and somes off quite sympathetic. But this is al preaching to the choir. Most voters can't translate this to Obama or Clinton, or their own vote. So I doubt if this will have much impact either way.

Clinton's guy says wait until June 3rd as usual.

Oh, god, it's not over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #41
43. Obama's guy just landed a good point about Clinton's honesty.
Edited on Sun Apr-20-08 09:50 AM by jazzjunkysue
He got her saying Obama's health care will "leave lots of people out in the cold." That dishonesty shows up in the polls where people say she's untrustworthy.

Landed a good one and Clinton's man had no return fire.

He's really weak. This is more evidence that the HRC campaign is broke and broken and coming unhinged. She's lost her strong supporters. If this is her best showing before PA, she's in real trouble.

Obama's guy is landing another good point about Clinton garnishing wages for healthcare fees. Clinton's guy is pathetic.

The people in clinton's hotel room are all hiding their heads in shame at this point, if they're even still in the room watching.

It's a little too early on sunday to go out and get sloshed. Not going to be a happy day in the clinton compound. Expect a little defensiveness today if clinton does any public speaking. She is now bruised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #43
46. He argued that Clinton never said she'd garnish people's wages to cover insurance costs
http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewNation.asp?Page=/Nation/archive/200802/NAT20080204b.html

Uh, yeah she did :eyes:

Has this guy not been watching the campaign at all?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #46
63. So would have been a good time to add...
Edited on Sun Apr-20-08 01:12 PM by rainbow4321
that HRC talks about everyone paying for healthcare premiums yet didn't pay Blue Cross/Shield and Aetna for her OWN PEOPLE'S health care for months acording the last FEC report. Guess SHE is the one who needs her wages garnished!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #43
51. It's great that Axelrod had the chance to talk substance
and he seemed to have his facts in order.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
47. Watching now...Geoff Garin..needed the face to regocnize him. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
powergirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #47
48. Poor Geoff - Why didn't they send Wolfson??
Why would the boss, presumably Sen. Clinton, send Geoff out there to twist in the wind. They couldn't sent Wolfson - but then they might ask him about his and Penn's swearing match. I'm glad Axelrod is on the Obama team. He is fully committed to this race and his heart is in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #48
50. Axelrod is also very good: Not fancy or sexy-Just solid and real.
Easy to follow and says things plainly. No washington dc insider jargon. He's solid without being emotional or defensive.

The talent has obviously voted and they've signed up with Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #50
54. That's a good description of Axelrod: solid.
He's not flashy, he doesn't feel the need to be important, he doesn't place his own interests above the candidate he works for. He communicates and connects with everyday people, but he is equally at ease facing off against the DC elitists.

Most of the upper campaign management/strategist staff is of a similar vein. Plouffe is very low-key, but that masks a brilliant mind and fierce determination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #48
55. Twist in the wind is right.
He clearly was not prepared. I couldn't believe his MoveOn answer. Someone at Camp Clinton had to know it would come up.

:thumbsup: to Axelrod. He was great as usual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ice-9 Donating Member (141 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
58. Axelrod washed his clock
I felt bad for Garin, though, because he's the new guy. A lot of the exchanges that Garin fumbled (e.g., the exchange about health care cost controls) were clearly about things that Garin just wasn't up to speed on yet. I think he would have done a better job had he been in that role longer and more familiar with the campaign. There were a couple of questions that he basically answered by saying, "Look, I've only been on this campaign for two weeks and am still figuring that out."

But the exchange about Mark Penn was pretty funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #58
60. I think Axelrod felt bad for him too
He mentioned early on in the discussion that Garin was a good friend and a good guy, and, it kind of seemed Axelrod was holding back a bit, at first anyway. But, clearly, as you point out, Garin is in a tough spot and not up to speed. Must be a difficult thing. Made him look like his heart wasn't in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
61. It is repeated later in the day on MSNBC
6PM and 2AM EDT! That's how I watch it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
62. Today's MTP video ("netcast") available on MSNBC.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
64. I was pissed off that
Tim tried to perpetuate the "he clasped his hands during the pledge of the allegiance" myth when it was the national anthem, and was disappointed that David Axelrod didn't catch it. Tim Russert is a friend to no Democrat, whenever he is on MSNBC lately, he completely distorts the answers that Clinton and Obama have given him in previous debates that he moderated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC