Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

it's as if lee atwater's soul took over hillary's body and is running her campaign

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
dano81818 Donating Member (185 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 11:25 AM
Original message
it's as if lee atwater's soul took over hillary's body and is running her campaign
"Her campaign has insinuated that he was once a drug dealer. Her husband has equated him with the rabble-rousing preacher Jesse Jackson. The Clintons have publicly associated Obama with domestic terrorist William Ayers, with the militant Palestinian group Hamas, and with antisemitic demagogue Louis Farrakhan. And what is remarkable about all this is that most of it was not done by surrogates, but by a former president of the United States against a senator in his own party, and directly by Clinton herself. Every time you think: “Nah, they won’t go there, will they?” – they do.

Right now, in Pennsylvania, Clinton is running only negative advertisements designed to exploit Obama’s gaffe a fortnight ago, when he described some rural Pennsylvanians as bitter, and as “clinging” to some traditional identities because they feel left out of economic and social change. It was a stupid offhand comment, easily misinterpreted, and Obama deserved a hit.

But this is what the Clintons’ actual advertisement says, voiced by several unidentified Pennsylvanians: “I was very insulted by Barack Obama.” “It shows how out of touch Barack Obama is.” “The good people of Pennsylvania deserve a lot better than what Barack Obama said.”

This is a swing state. For the Clintons baldly to coopt exactly the kind of antielitist rhetoric used to marginalise Democrats by Republicans for three decades is to take the campaign warfare to a whole new level of earth-scorching."

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/andrew_sullivan/article3778978.ece
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. Atwater repented on his death bed
this is all the Clintons' doing

it's been shown time and time again that they'll do anything for power


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dano81818 Donating Member (185 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. lol so you are saying this was an insult to atwater
i see your point :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. pretty much
and welcome to DU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Even Lee Atwater would be horrified by the Hillary campaign's tactics
possibly even before his deathbed apology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Doubtful. Were you around when Atwater was doing his thing? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
22. I remember Lee Atwater very well
what the Clintons are doing would have made him very proud when before he repented of his actions


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
21. Ouch!
but I've got to agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
4. "...voiced by several unidentified Pennsylvanians....."
....Including one who was already identified as a Clinton campaign hack from Jersey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
7. Stated more succinctly than DU'ers have, but it's been a theme in this forum...
Edited on Sun Apr-20-08 11:41 AM by HereSince1628
For a month now, Obama has been pummelled by a Democrat in ways I have never witnessed in a primary campaign. Senator Hillary Clinton has directly argued that he is less qualified to be commander-in-chief than the Republican nominee, John McCain. She has said that she doesn’t know for sure that he is not a secret Muslim. She has said his choice of church is unacceptable to her. She has said he deliberately wants many Americans to continue scraping by without health insurance.

Her campaign has insinuated that he was once a drug dealer. Her husband has equated him with the rabble-rousing preacher Jesse Jackson. The Clintons have publicly associated Obama with domestic terrorist William Ayers, with the militant Palestinian group Hamas, and with antisemitic demagogue Louis Farrakhan. And what is remarkable about all this is that most of it was not done by surrogates, but by a former president of the United States against a senator in his own party, and directly by Clinton herself. Every time you think: “Nah, they won’t go there, will they?” – they do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
8. Welcome to DU
I agree about the swing state.

I cannot imagine that there will not be consequences down the road for the block of Dems in Congress that constitute her core support.

I think this may well be the swan song of Rahm Emmanuel and the third way. Between this campaign, and the IWR, the shark is behind them now.

I think Bill Clinton may have lost a lot of good will from the African American community for years to come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dano81818 Donating Member (185 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. just an fyi
i didnt write that, it is from an article that i linked to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
9. Links to Andrew Sullivan on DU?
Puhleeze.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Sully's a progressive now. Didn't you know? LOL!
Apparently, all it takes to be redeemed now is to accept The Obamessiah as one's Lord and Savior.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Er, he also endorsed Kerry over Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. With friends like Sully
who needs enemies?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Bash him if you want, but he endorsed the Dems in '04 and '06, and looks to in '08. He's certainly
a conservative, but at the same time he's no knee-jerker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #13
23. with friends like Hillary
and Bill and Carville and the rest of the Clinton hit squad

who needs enemies
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. Er, after serving as chief courtier to Bush for years.
Does anyone else remember Sully's love affair with Bush? Oh, he was just so manly and decisive, unlike those treasonous liberal fifth columnists, and he understood the menace of "Islamofascism." Sully's heart used to flutter every time he thought of Georgie.

Back in those days, Sully could have taught the folks in the court of Louis XIV a few things about shoe-buckle-kissing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Yeah. He's a conservative. At the same time, he's not a right-wing zombie. Around '03-'04,
Edited on Sun Apr-20-08 12:08 PM by Occam Bandage
he started writing about how the Republican party had abandoned any pretense of legitimacy or true conservatism, and they became some of his primary targets.

He realizes that the Iraq war was a mistake. He's anti-corruption, anti-torture, anti-drug-war, pro-gay-rights, anti-theocrat, and has called his Bush cheerleading "stupid and premature," calling Bush now a "shallow, monstrous, weak, and petty man."

Realistically, if you want to win in '08, you're going to need 'converts' who are sick of the Republican party. Sullivan is one of them. He's neither liberal nor Democrat, but he's a voice for the millions of moderate-conservative Americans who are sickened with the Republican party--and who are ripe for conversion to the Democratic party.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. I don't trust Sully, and that goes way back before this campaign.
It's true that we need to get every vote we can, and if RAWMUSLGLUTES is willing to vote for a Democrat, then good, but that does not mean I have to treat him like a prophet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Well, you shouldn't 'trust' him; he ain't one of us and probably never will be. At the same time,
he's one of the few major voices that I can think of representing a rather large voting bloc (that is to say, moderate independent libertarians), and doing so in a generally fair manner. Yeah, he was a tool after 9/11, but his stuff from the last few years is pretty good.

We Democrats disagree with him on plenty of issues--he's pro-tax-cut, anti-welfare, pro-Social-Security-privatization, and anti-health-care-reform. At the same time, he agrees with us on a number of issues, he isn't a bully or an ideologue, and he isn't committed to either party. He seems to be writing what he honestly believes, rather than attempting to appease a rabid audience or engage in rhetorical warfare against an enemy. I wouldn't treat him like a prophet, no. But I wouldn't dismiss him as a hack, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. I use his writings
to understand the limits of Republican/Libtrn buyer's remorse.

And what I gather is that the loved ones of actual thinking conservatives have hidden all the razor blades.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
20. Why do we assume that Obama's campaign hasn't played dirty?
If there is an heir to Atwater's ability, it is undoubtedly David Axelrod's brilliant whisper campaign to the media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. pray tell
what whisper campaign

please give details


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC