Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Undecided superdelegates don't feel bound by primaries

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 05:30 PM
Original message
Undecided superdelegates don't feel bound by primaries

http://apnews.excite.com/article/20080420/D905PE0G0.html

Apr 20, 3:15 PM (ET)

By STEPHEN OHLEMACHER

WASHINGTON (AP) - Many of the Democratic superdelegates who are still undecided say the most important factor in their decision is simple - they just want a winner in November.

Problem is, after nearly four months of primaries and caucuses in 46 states, territories and the District of Columbia, they still aren't sure who that is, don't seem be in any hurry to make up their minds and aren't interested in any artificial process that might force them to choose between Barack Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Most of the more than 100 undecided superdelegates who discussed their decision-making with The Associated Press in the past two weeks agreed that the primaries and caucuses do matter - whether it's who has the most national delegates or the candidate who won their state or congressional district. But few said the primaries will be the biggest factor in their decision.

"I think it's really important that we keep our eye on the prize, and the prize is the win in November," said Gail Rasmussen, an undecided superdelegate from Oregon.

That's good news for Clinton, who cannot catch Obama in delegates won in the few remaining primaries and caucuses.

Obama has been arguing for months that the superdelegates would be overturning the will of the voters if they don't nominate the candidate who has won the most pledged delegates. He has a 164-delegate lead in that category. Clinton, meanwhile, has argued that superdelegates should exercise independent judgment.

FULL story at link.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. I call bullshit..'cause if their eyes
were really on the prize then they would open their eyes and see hilary is a fucking mess and wouldn't win a thing in November.

HELLO. What's this guy's agenda?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. The agenda is obvious.... to promote Clintons only remaining selling point
All Clinton has left is the argument "see how badly the Republicans can tear into Obama based on our Republican campaign against him?"

Its the vilest display of crass political bullcrap I've ever seen, and I hope the super delegates refuse to support a Republican running as a Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. hilary has already freakin' Swiftboated her-
puffed up-self, if they had taken one second to notice.

I think who ever wrote this is a mediawhore with an agenda.

There is no breathing room between hilary and mccain.



hilary dishonored our Soldiers





Obama wants to honor them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. "That's good news for Clinton"
I strongly doubt that, but hang on to that thought, Hil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. My prediction is that they're just waiting for cover before they break for Obama....
... We'll see though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azmouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. The indecision of the SD is killing our chances for a win in Nov.
By letting this drag on they are wasting the nominee's time and money, and losing the opportunities to fight back against McSame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Gutless wonders maybe?
Or they could be wise. I don't know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC