Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does CNN owe Obama an equal hour of air time on Monday night? re: EQUAL TIME RULE

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
kid a Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 10:24 PM
Original message
Does CNN owe Obama an equal hour of air time on Monday night? re: EQUAL TIME RULE
EQUAL TIME RULE

U.S. Broadcasting Regulatory Rule

It is the closest thing in broadcast content regulation to the "golden rule." The equal time, or more accurately, the equal opportunity provision of the Communications Act requires radio and television stations and cable systems which originate their own programming to treat legally qualified political candidates equally when it comes to selling or giving away air time. Simply put, a station which sells or gives one minute to Candidate A must sell or give the same amount of time with the same audience potential to all other candidates for the particular office. However, a candidate who can not afford time does not receive free time unless his or her opponent is also given free time. Thus, even with the equal time law, a well funded campaign has a significant advantage in terms of broadcast exposure for the candidate.

The equal opportunity requirement dates back to the first major broadcasting law in the United States, the Radio Act of 1927. Legislators were concerned that without mandated equal opportunity for candidates, some broadcasters might try to manipulate elections. As one congressman put it, "American politics will be largely at the mercy of those who operate these stations." When the Radio Act was superseded by the Communications Act of 1934, the equal time provision became Section 315 of the new statute.

http://www.museum.tv/archives/etv/E/htmlE/equaltimeru/equaltimeru.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Didn't he already have his turn on Larry Kind a few weeks ago?
I thought I remembered Larry King interviewing Obama and saying that Clinton had an open invitation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kid a Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. not sure...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
my3boyz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I know Michelle was on there but I don't remember Obama being on there. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. No
CNN is not a broadcast outlet. It's a cable network.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libnnc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'm thinking since CNN is cable, the equal time rule doesn't count
If it had been on an over the air network then yes, they would owe Obama equal time.

I could be wrong though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kid a Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. if he already did Larry King, that is the answer. But according to the link
cable is included
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libnnc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. didn't realize cable was included--thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 03:11 AM
Response to Reply #7
20. It says cable systems that originate their own programming
I'm thinking that means if Comcast, for example, aired shows of its own making.

But the government has no control over what CNN shows, nor should it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. Blitzer is in deep in MYOP.
He could pay it back by having Obama on and keeping his mouth shut.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. I thought the "equal time rule" died in 1996
Edited on Sun Apr-20-08 10:32 PM by donheld
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kid a Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Its alive, but has these exceptions, which the Larry King Show most likely falls under
From wiki:

"However, there are four exceptions: if the air-time was in a documentary, bona fide news interview, scheduled newscast or an on-the-spot news event the equal-time rule is not valid."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
10. To be honest, having Clinton on for an hour may not actually help her
Unless it's a puff piece love fest, it can actually make people see how Hillary Clinton "answers" a question. It's not always pretty.

Whatever...

:boring:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kid a Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Maybe Sean Hannity will give Larry a call tomorrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladywnch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
13. I thought 'equal time' had been part of the fairness doctrine that Ronney
threw out back in the 80s?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kid a Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. This article is about a rule applicable to U.S. broadcast licensees with respect to political candid
This article is about a rule applicable to U.S. broadcast licensees with respect to political candidates. For rules on matters of public controversy, see Fairness Doctrine.

The equal-time rule specifies that U.S. radio and television broadcast stations must provide an equivalent opportunity to any opposing political candidates who might request it. This means, for example that if a station gives one free minute to a candidate on the prime time, it must do the same to another.

However, there are four exceptions: if the air-time was in a documentary, bona fide news interview, scheduled newscast or an on-the-spot news event the equal-time rule is not valid. Since 1983, political debates not hosted by the media station are considered news events, thus may include only major-party candidates without having to offer air time to minor-party or independent candidates.

This rule originated in § 18 of the Radio Act of 1927<1>. It was later superseded by the Communications Act of 1934, where the Equal Time Rule is codified as § 315(a).

Another provision of § 315(a) prohibits stations from censoring campaign ads. A related provision, in § 315(b), requires that broadcasters offer time to candidates at the same rate as their "most favored advertiser".

The rule was created because FCC thought the stations could easily manipulate the outcome of the elections.

The Equal-time rule is sometimes confused with the Fairness Doctrine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladywnch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. thanks for the info. I haven't seen 'equal time' in so long I just assumed
it was part of the fairness doctrin. If that rule is still in place it would appear that EVERYONE in broadcasting is ignoring it. Again thanks for the info
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. House of Saud trusts Bushes and Clintons, who've proven they can be trusted to protect the Kingdom
Edited on Mon Apr-21-08 11:56 AM by blm
and its interests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthpusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
14. dont worry. nobody will want to sit through an hour of that anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
15. He had his hour on 3/20.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GainesT1958 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
16. The Equal Time Rule went out...
During the first year(s) of the Reagan Administration. Their excuse was the then-emerging cable industry.

Would be neat if Obama "just happened to call in", though!:eyes:

B-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
17. Since when is king broadcast? Who cares anyway?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
19. Hope this backfires on
hilary and consequently cnn like her big hallmark canned hall did before Texas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
23. He apparently was on Larry King already, not sure when.
I did see Michelle Obama on his show not long ago. I heard Larry King say one night a month or so ago that he had gotten mail asking why Hillary had not yet been on his show when both Obama and McCain had been on. He said that night he would love to have Hillary on his show and that she had a standing invitation (or something to that effect).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC