Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

PA is looking more and more like Texas.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 02:29 PM
Original message
PA is looking more and more like Texas.
Edited on Mon Apr-21-08 02:30 PM by Drunken Irishman
I'm not saying it'll break like Texas, but it has nearly the same feel.

Two weeks before the primary, Obama finally took the lead in Texas and held it until a few days out, when polls began to pick up a Clinton surge. It was large enough to erase Obama's lead and actually put her over the top. I'm getting the same sense, but reversed this time around. Clinton has pretty much led PA for months and in the final hours of the campaign, polls show a noticeable shift toward Obama. Now I'm not sure if it'll be enough to put him over the top, but it probably means, if he loses, it won't be by much and that's what Obama wanted all along. The trend favors him and it's actually best that he's surging a couple of days before the election, because it means his momentum won't stall prior to election day. That's what happened in Texas, as Obama surged for about a week and then leveled out. Had the Texas primary been held a week earlier, Obama probably would have won. I think we're going to see the same thing play out this time around, however, it'll benefit Obama instead of Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Justitia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. But the good news is that Obama DID win TX: Obama - 99, Clinton - 94. -eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Well yes, that was good news.
But had he won the popular vote, along with the delegate count, the election would most likely have ended.

The media was building Texas up as an Obama win, even though the polls showed it shifting toward Clinton in the final hours. Now they're doing the reverse, building PA up as a Clinton win and stating she needs to win it by double digits to carry on. If the trend is true, that ain't happening and it will be a huge blow to her campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hell-bent Donating Member (593 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. Oh, let's not forget that excellent example of democracy
in action with Hillary winning the popular vote by 101,029 votes but losing Texas by your standards. WTF kind of undemocratic crap is this where one candidate is the favorite choice by 101,029 votes over the other and yet loses! Sounds like some kind of voting that went on in the Soviet Union. "It's not who gets the most votes; it's who counts the votes."......Stalin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justitia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. blah, blah, blah - didn't hear any complaints when Bill Clinton swept Texas.
Clinton supporters can complain NOW about their sour grapes over losing TX, but they LOVED the state system when they won it twice in the 90s.

you should listen to your candidate "If you can't take the heat....get out of Texas" :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stellanoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. Little known fact
he did win after the caucuses and the convention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. I would love to see Hillary net 10 delegates into Obama's 170 point lead
then we can hear that "Pennsylvania is not important, but Puerto Rico is"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoneOffShore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Even if it's a shut-out you'll hear that, grasshopper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
20. Master Po?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
here_is_to_hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. At least Puerto Rico has some decent surf...
:spank: :spank: :spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. Obama is taking no prisoners. He's not going to let her steal this from him.
He's holding her margins down, cutting her off from gaining an inch of ground.

Block by block, state by state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. We're not seeing the same kitchen sink strategy
that wound up damagine Obama two days before the primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Yup...I honestly think they don't have anything left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. She's tried her damndest, but I think she's out of kitchen sinks. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I hope we don't get anymore Obama gaffes
As much as I totally agreed with him on "bittergate", it was a headache that we didn't have to experience. Since I doubt this whole thing will end by tomorrow, I hope he doesn't put his foot in his mouth anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. I'm afraid there will be more; he'll be ganged up again on
Edited on Mon Apr-21-08 02:57 PM by babylonsister
even perceived gaffes. As much as I like him taking the high road, I do think he has to defend himself more, and give as good as he gets. He can do that without sinking to her level. He is getting better at it, and humor does work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. He was pretty soft on her at last week's debate
I expected him to crush her over Tuzla. He let it slide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
14. With the SEIU backing Obama I'm predicting that Obama will pull out a squeaker in PA
I've watched the SEIU in action many many times; in fact, Philadelphia HQ for many major campaigns are usually at the SEIU HQ off of Spring Garden Avenue. SEIU will give their voters the day off to help get out the vote, but that's not the reason why Obama will win.

See, hundreds of volunteers from the suburbs will descend into Philadelphia to help get out the vote and they will be distributed to locations where suburbanites would want to go to help get out the vote - Main Line, Great Northeast, Old City, Manayunk and other middle class on up areas. But that leaves a large chunk of Philadelphia not canvased - North & West Philly. Areas where suburbanites would prefer to not go. However, the SEIU has no problem sending their members into these regions. They'll go in there with buses and gather up voters to get them to the polls. And they'll get high voter turnout in those regions.

I think that this is one major factor that will help Pennsylvania go to Obama. You get high voter turnout in Philadelhpia, and that was easily done for the 2002 Dem primary election when Ed Rendell wanted an upset over Bob Casey Jr, you need high voter turnout in Philadelphia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. I hope you're right!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. Let's put it this way - if I'm wrong, it's still not going to help Hillary
She needs a major upset in Pennsylvania. I think worse case she's going to pull out a squeaker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. I agree! 83,000 SIEU members! NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. I agree! 83,000 SIEU members! NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
19. There is a disconnect that I don't understand: They are saying the race
is neck and neck--but how is it that Clinton is not raising any money? If people want her to be the next president, where are the matching donations? Where is the financial support?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
21. Did they strike oil?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC