Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

It Is April, Do You Know Who Your Political Opponent Is?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 05:16 PM
Original message
It Is April, Do You Know Who Your Political Opponent Is?
I do. Mine is John McCain. Here is the second journal in my series about GE strategy that we should be working on now:

I. McCain Did NOT Learn His Lesson from Keating Five Keating Five is the worst scandal in McCain’s closet. It may be difficult for Obama to bring it up, however, since doing so will give the RNC a green light to bring up Rezko. On the plus side, it is likely to give McCain second thoughts about introducing Rezko to the general election campaign, since his own involvement in the Keating case is much, much worse. For Hillary, the Keating case is all positive, since everyone already knows about Whitewater and they know that after the millions were spent, the Clintons were cleared of wrong doing (and if they do not know it, they can be told in twelve words or five seconds).

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/03/24/politics/main3964240.shtml?source=RSSattr=Politics_3964240

In a CBS report “Keating Scandal Still Haunts McCain” which came out after his recent lobbyist scandal, the durability of Keating Five was revealed. No one has forgotten the name and the gist of this story. McCain and three other Senators got into hot water for trying to use their power to intimidate regulators who were investigating a Savings & Loan whose owner, Charles Keating, had contributed to the campaigns.

The investigation ended in early 1991 with a rebuke that McCain "exercised poor judgment in intervening with the regulators." But the Senate ethics committee also determined McCain's actions "were not improper nor attended with gross negligence."

Snip

In the Keating investigation, the committee said more than one year had passed - a "decent interval" - between the last contributions Keating raised for McCain and the two 1987 meetings he attended with banking regulators. McCain later paid $112,000 - the amount Keating raised for him - to the U.S. Treasury.


“Poor judgment.” Well color me Checkers. Now, the real problem for McCain is that though he claims that he learned his lesson, recent events prove that he did not learn his lesson.

McCain has claimed the Keating scandal sensitized him even to the appearance of potential conflicts of interest. But in recent weeks, McCain has defended himself anew over another instance in which he intervened with federal regulators on behalf of a prominent campaign contributor - years ago but after the Keating rebuke. Again, McCain denies acting improperly.

McCain wrote two letters in late 1999 to the Federal Communications Commission on behalf of Florida-based Paxson Communications. He urged quick consideration of a proposal to buy a television station license in Pittsburgh, although he did not ask the FCC commissioners to approve the proposal. At the time, one FCC commissioner's formal nomination was pending before McCain's Senate committee, and the FCC chairman complained that McCain's letters were improper.

McCain wrote the letters after receiving more than $20,000 in contributions from the company's executives and lobbyists. Chief executive Lowell W. "Bud" Paxson also lent McCain his company's jet at least four times during 1999 for campaign travel.


McCain will campaign as clean politician. His wife is rich. Why should he need money? However, America really does not know that much about him, and it would be very easy to alter its image of him with these two stories.

II. Friendly Fire From His Fellow Republicans Will Be Our Best Friend Before they were for him, many of the right were against him. Just look at this article from Newsmax in 2006 spelling out all the reasons why John McCain is not fit to be president.

http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2006/8/30/123006.shtml

The article talks about McCain’s temper.

A July 5 NewsMax.com article quoted former Sen. Bob Smith, a New Hampshire Republican who served with McCain on the Senate Armed Services Committee, as saying, "I have witnessed incidents where he has used profanity at colleagues and exploded at colleagues . . . He would disagree about something and then explode. It was incidents of irrational behavior. We've all had incidents where we have gotten angry, but I've never seen anyone act like that."

Snip

"I think he is mentally unstable and not fit to be president," former congressman LeBoutillier said.


The article repeats some of McCain’s most embarrassing verbal blunders:

"Why is Chelsea Clinton so ugly?" McCain said at a GOP fund-raiser in Washington. "Because Janet Reno is her father."
When running stories on Sen. George Allen's recent reference to a student of Indian descent as a "macaca," a genus of monkey, the media referred to inappropriate remarks by other political candidates but never mentioned McCain's 2000 statement, "I hate the gooks," a racial epithet for Asians. McCain later apologized and said he was referring to his wartime captors.


Finally, the article suggests that McCain is not healthy enough to serve because of his age and melanoma history.

The beauty of the right wing attacks on McCain is that if Democrats leveled these same attacks on him, they would sound mean. However, if right wingers and Republicans can be quoted saying these mean things about him, then they sound like they are bringing up honest objections. So, for people who have moved beyond the Clinton-Obama flame wars and who want to find something productive to do for the general election, start looking online for quotes that can be used in the general election, before the RNC starts scrubbing the internet. These things are much worse than Obama saying that McCain is better than Bush or Hillary saying that McCain has passed the Commander-in-Chief test. There is political gold out there.

III. McCain is a Serial Adulterer, Too Yep, McCain is a certified adulterer. He even dumped the wife who raised his kids while he was a POW and married a rich woman who got him into Congress.

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2006/0607.benen.html

And then he committed adultery against Cindy with Vicki.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/02/20/john-mccain-affair-links_n_87690.html

So, we can pretty much assume that Monica is off the table. And no racially charged innuendo about Black men being hypersexual, either. I would not bring this one up, unless Clinton is the nominee and some McCain staffer is dumb enough to try to make Monica an issue and McCain decides not to fire that person ASAP. Since the press really likes sex, as in really likes SEX!!! I expect them to report on the sex angle of this election without any prodding from either candidate.

IV. McCain’s Is Stumbling Down Memory Lane I have a theory. John McCain could be suffering the normal effects of aging on the mind and memory. If that is the case, he is totally unqualified to be president and his nomination is a joke. However, if his last melanoma was just a little bit more advanced than his doctors admitted and if he required Xray therapy, it could have caused some damage to a part of his brain that would explain his current difficulties verbalizing and his problems with memory. If this is the case, he might want to fess up, since this type of localized lesion would be better (i.e stable and isolated, more like a fixed disability) than the more common alternative, progressive dementia of old age.

Here is an article about some of his recent gaffes:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/us_elections/article3736044.ece

Last week, while questioning General David Petraeus in Congress about progress in Iraq, the Arizona senator also garbled the distinction between the Sunni Muslims backing Al-Qaeda and the Shi’ite radicals who are sponsored by Iran.
Senator Joe Lieberman, his friend, had already had to whisper a correction in his ear last month when he claimed that Al-Qaeda was being trained by Iran. “I’m sorry; the Iranians are training the extremists, not Al-Qaeda. Not Al-Qaeda, I’m sorry,” McCain said hastily.


At this rate, I can envision reporters starting a new game this fall Let’s stump McCain. Use strings of similar sounding words with very different meanings and see if he can keep them straight. Sounds sort of evil to me, like bear baiting, but we all know that members of the press are a nasty bunch who get their kick from pulling the wings off flies.

http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/5920188/the_press_vs_al_gore

"You can actually disprove some of what Bush is saying if you really get in the weeds and get out your calculator, or you look at his record in Texas," Time magazine columnist Margaret Carlson told radio morning man Don Imus at the height of the campaign. "But it's really easy, and it's fun, to disprove Gore. As sport, and as our enterprise, Gore coming up with another whopper is greatly entertaining to us."


This actually sounds awful, and I hope to God that they don’t do it. It will be enough if they simply report his blunders in a truthful manner.

This one is going to hurt McCain more than any of the others. Clinton will just floor him with her grasp of details. She will wash over him like a hurricane. The contrast between Obama’s youth and McCain’s mental feebleness will make the contest seem like a joke. I can not wait for the first debate.

V. 100 Years of War He said it, we just have to repeat it. I am still waiting for the buttons with McCain’s snarling face that read “100 Years of War, I can live with it” at the top. And at the bottom “I hope you can too”. These will be the "War is good business. Invest your son" of the 2008 campaign if someone will just make them. Hmmm. I have a button maker. Maybe I should whip some up.

VI. Attack His Strengths Democrats forget this one lots of times. They tell themselves “Old so and so is a blank and a blank and a blank so we can not do x, y or z, because no one will buy it.” But this is probably the most important one of all, since McCain has nothing to offer the country except his feel good I spent Viet Nam I a box for you straight shootin’ Maverick self. He has no solutions to the economic crisis. He has no plans to end the war. He has no hope. No optimism. He says the jobs are not coming back. If he is elected president, the circle of lobbyists who surround him like a pack of hyenas will run the country. Do we want that?

Now, this is going to be tricky. It has been easy for Obama to complain that Clinton was a dirty trickster in the primary when she ran attack ads, because the GOP has spent 15 years characterizing her as a bitch and even her own supporters think of her as a fighter. So, his camp has been taking advantage of a narrative that was already in play.

It has been more difficult for Clinton to get the press or voters to listen to her when she complains of deceptive mailers or attack ads, because Obama has no history, so there is no narrative of Obama as a cheater or bastard to play upon. Therefore, she wages an uphill battle.

In McCain’s case, there is a narrative that he does not cheat or attack character. So, when the RNC and Rush and FOX begin their inevitable smear campaign against the Democratic nominee, McCain is going to make like Obama. A few days after each attack,he will say "I disavow that. We should talk about the issues, not distractions." And everyone will praise him for being such a good guy--even though Dems will all know that he is a cheater who is benefiting directly from the smears he dissavows. So, the Democrats are going to have to get their act together. They are going to have to stop sniping each other and focus on the opponent which means pointing one great big Democratic finger at McCain and saying You are to blame! And they will have to use the left wing press and bloggo-sphere to denounce every attack against the Democrat as coming directly from the RNC—and McCain—even as McCain denies it.

This is one reason why Karl Rove wants to see a fractured Democratic Party. If the attacks against the Democratic nominee are coming from other Democrats as they did in 1968----antiwar Dems who supported McCarthy denouncing the nominee Humphrey—or in 1972---working class Dems who supported Humphrey splitting from McGovern—then McCain can campaign and still look like a good guy.

That is why one of the goals of the Democrats has to be to show that the “good guy, McCain” myth is just a myth. He cheats on his wives. He utters racial and sexist slurs. He gets into fights with other members of Congress. He takes bribes. But it has to be done fairly. If the Democrats look like they are crucifying a war hero, they will look like bad guys. How do you avoid doing that? It is a judgment call. If you think to yourself I am merely showing the true man behind the mask you will not cross any lines. For the sake of America's future, do not do in the general what many Democrats have done in the primary. The kind of attacks which I have seen leveled against Democratic candidates by voters who claim to be Democrats (some of them are probably Freepers) would turn Americans off the Democratic Party forever. Here is a good rule of thumb. If you are citing something that was said or done, it is probably sound criticism. If it is blanket condemnation like McCain is a "liar" "NeoCon" "warmonger" it is inappropriate. As with good fiction writing, show, don't tell.

Testimonials from people who know the man, who have witnessed him and his temper, who have seen the things he would rather not have discussed in public are probably the best way to go here, since this kind of information has the effect of unmasking the figure on the stage in the Greek tragedy, turning him human. And if it comes from a well known conservative or a Republican or a member of his own family, that is even better, because it will ring true.

The time to start is now. It takes many months to define a candidate’s character. If we wait until September, it is too late. McCain will have defined himself. And his self definition is a lie. Do we want America to buy another lie as almost half of them did in 2000? Hell, no. Our job is to help them open their eyes.

Conclusion: These are all things that Democrats can do now to improve the party’s chances this fall. I am going to start combing the internet for right wing and Republican quotes that will reveal the true John McCain and try to put together a journal entirely devoted to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well researched, K and R. And that's just the stuff we already know
I think being able to hit McCain back is going to be the crucial thing that will put Obama or Clinton over the top. Obama is going to get hit with Ayers/Rezko/Wright which is basically the same shit that has been used against Democrats for decades. The difference from Nixon/Reagan/Bush using it is that McCain isn't an incumbent and so his past is still in question.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah, fascists.
Same as always.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. Don'tmisunderestimate McCain (as bush would say)
No one was more reviled than george w. bush, we had everything on our side against him, and yet the votes for Kerry weren't strong enough to overcome election tampering.

My personal belief is that not only must we be able to assail McCain on his deficiences 24/7 until November, we must make sure that anyone whom we believe will vote Democratic must be convinced to register, or, if already registered, convinced to show up and vote. Complacency and cynicism are the worst enemies the Democratic party has. We do not operate on automatic pilot as the GOP faithful so often do.

Great post, McCamy. I say that every time, but it's true :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
balantz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. I've heard a couple of people lately say that McCain might make a so-so president.
I personally would never think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
here_is_to_hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. You kidding me?
You devote weeks and weeks and thousands of words attacking Obama and now that your martyr is fucked...
Look, your candidate gave the the RNC and Mclame so much to work with, you have some big balls to start in after just yesterday publishing yet another anti-Obama piece. I think you did one this am too...
Yeah, you can come home again but not without a spanking...
:spank: :spank: :spank: :spank: :spank: :spank: :spank: :spank: :spank: :spank: :spank: :spank: :spank: :spank: :spank: :spank: :spank:

Now, get to work undoing all the damage you have done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jettison Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. From one Kool-aid drinker to another
...that's a pretty classless response to the OP. You don't bash a post bashing a Repub even if you don't agree with the OP's choice of Democrat. That should be a pretty universally held opinion around here. If you're voting for Obama, presumably and partially because of his ability to take the high road, then the least you can do is to take his cue and follow suit. Ad hominem never contributes and always detracts from the message whether you agree or not with the sentiment.

And the "spanking" thing is just lame... and do you really want to feed lines to those people screaming "sexism"? If that was your aim then nice job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
here_is_to_hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I take it you have not read through
Taylors daily rants against Obama? Not for Hillary mind you but anti-Obama. So she digs this big fucking hole and then when she sees there is no way out...
Sorry, I have no love and very little if any respect for such a person as this OP.

And welcome to DU:beer:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Two Americas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. you are embarrassing yourself n/t
...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
here_is_to_hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. No, I support Obama but thanks....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Two Americas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. what difference does that make?
Because you "support Obama" - whatever that means - therefore you feel free to be as mean-spirited as you feel like being and think you are immune from criticism?

That is an interesting admission, and an honest one, I think.

"Say there, aren't you ashamed of yourself?"

"Ashamed? No. You see, I support Obama."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jettison Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Obama folks on this board...
... outnumber Hillary folks by a substantial margin. They read the Hillary bashing all day long. It's deafening. Do you really expect them not to go negative in return? You can't possibly believe that. The OP sounds like she's a person that will be voting for a democrat come election time. That makes her a friend. I do not agree with everything she writes, but I certainly agree with that sentiment. The enemy of my enemy is my friend. The OP is a friend. Hillary isn't even close to my first choice. Obama isn't hers. But if we both understand that McCain isn't the answer then we have enough common ground to not only act civil toward each other, but also to embrace the other's ideals once push comes to shove.

Always remember how similar the policies of Hillary and Obama, and remember how much you loathe the policies of McCain. If you can't say that's true, I'd question whether you're really a Democrat. I don't have to like Hillary, but I'll embrace her as my President should she pull of some miraculous upset because the alternative is infinitely worse, and she has many policies that resonate with me as a voter looking out for his own best interests and those of his peers and country.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ekwhite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. OK - put down the paddle
It is time for all of us to put our grudges away and focus on the upcoming battle against McCain. I will work with other Democrats to elect Obama in the fall, whether or not I agree with their choice of candidates in the primary. This was a good post pointing out some of McCain's weaknesses that we can start using against him.

Besides which, to paraphrase Nance Greggs: "Jesus may have died for your sins, but what makes you think he died and left you boss"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. I have posted many journals in defense of Obama and yet people say I am pro Hillary
I do not get it.

I try to provide balance. When everyone here goes too far one way--especially when they are all parroting the same nonsense or distortion or outright lie, you had better bet that I am going to write the exact opposite. There are two sides to almost everything.

If this place were full of people calling Obama a Muslim or anti-American I would be arguing with them, too.

I am not going to join some bandwagon, no matter how much peer pressure you apply. That just is not my nature. I have no problem being the lone voice for any cause. For example, in 6th grade, some guy came to my class in public school handing out New Testaments. When he got to me I said out loud so people could hear "No thanks. There is a law against religion in public schools. You should not be here." He went on down the line. There was a Jewish girl in class, she was the only other one who did not take one. I sure was glad I said what I did after she refused one, because it meant that she was not alone.

So, flame away. It just increases my resolve.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
here_is_to_hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Get over yourself. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. McCamy, the reason I like to read your posts whether I agree or not is
because you always start at point A, move to point B, and follow it up with point C. You use logic and reason. You tend to avoid hyperbole. In fact, you're better at it than I am. Keep your chin up and keep up the good work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnydrama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. has anybody mentioned this.
Everybody all over the progressive blogosphere gave huge amounts of shit to W for what he did right after Katrina, and where he went.

Did everybody forget who exactly was with him, during his let them eat cake moment?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
14. I agree completely. We need to start defining McCain now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tyler Durden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
17. Another kick past the rants and snide comments.
Keep doing hard writing. So SICK of the rants that pass for analysis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TragedyandHope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
18. Lots of great information. Thank you
And that's probably just the tip of the iceberg.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
20. Another trip to the top of the page for you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal_rxstudent Donating Member (69 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
21. Well said...
I've seen some of your posts from the past few weeks, and I don't think you were necessarily smearing Obama. I think that you have been trying to educate those who have become so certain that their views are correct about issues that we as a (UNITED) party face--that if we don't acknowledge them now, we will be forced to later. It is apparent that you are dedicated to keeping our party together, without regard to who takes the nomination. Thanks for your insight!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WayneF Donating Member (23 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
22. Hi, McCamy Taylor: May I use this on my website rejectmccain.com?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC