Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Chuck Todd Election Analysis: The pledged delegate count is OVER (video)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 09:43 PM
Original message
Chuck Todd Election Analysis: The pledged delegate count is OVER (video)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
2020vision Donating Member (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hil only picked up 6 delegates more than Obama
According to the CNN front page.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. They can't possibly know that yet. All the votes aren't even in yet. ???? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. They are assuming she wins by 10, which is the most she will win by.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. Obama winning a majority of pledged delegates has been inevitable for weeks.
But he doesn't have 2024 of them.

I'll stick around and see how the popular vote turns out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. There is really NO such thing as "popular vote" in the primaries
This was a Clinton concept pushed when they were likely to lose the popular vote - even then they are wanting to add in Michigan without giving ANY to Obama - and they are still behind even with that.

Now remember where we started. HRC was inevitable, she had:
- Most of the Democratic party in exile in the think tanks - most of whom owe past jobs to being in teh Clinton administration
- She was thought the only one able to win the money needed to win SuperTuesday and on top of that, with her name recognition she was the default winner
- She had Bill Clinton - a "rock star"
- She could claim WJC accomplishments - and force her opponent to attack the last Democratic President.

Now imagine that this were not the US, but a third world country that altered the rules to put the wife of the last leader in power. What would we say. To argue that she is the stronger candidate if with all these advantages, she's still losing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. You can pretend there isn't.
Edited on Tue Apr-22-08 10:00 PM by tritsofme
But the fact that a large number of SDs haven't stepped forward and stopped this thing suggests to me that they believe the popular vote and other election variables do exist and do matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. You are pretending - not me
You don't have a consistent, equivalent process in each state. Do you think that a statistician would add the raw data over various cells without normalizing them to reflect that different methods and different percent participation happened in various stratas? I don't because the result would not reflect the underlying sentiment.

I assume that the SDs have not moved forward because the Clintons have successfully made it seem that it's unfair as some haven't voted yet. Look at the way the Obama campaign is not "throwing the kitchen sink" at HRC - and there are HUGE things in that sink. Why, because to win in November he can't split the party. The Clintons don't care about whether he wins or not. They are hurting the party, but ironically it might be worse if the SD step in and they go ballistic!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. Keep dreaming, Obama will be the nominee when you wake up.
NT!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. No. It has been widely reported that the SDs don't want to *appear* as preempting the vote ...
... and so are waiting for the voting to end before committing. Well, the voting to end or Hillary ending or suspending her campaign.

Popular vote exists as a talking point for the Clinton campaign, and they've had some success obfuscating the issue and getting the media to talk about the popular vote, but it is an invalid measure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. WooHoo
:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Road Scholar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. Thanks. nt K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Genevieve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
8. k and r /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freida5 Donating Member (649 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
10. He has been wrong about everything else. He is wrong again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunsetDreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. No he is gererally right! Nice try though!
Edited on Tue Apr-22-08 10:20 PM by SunsetDreams
In fact all the pundits are saying she can't possibly win the delgate count.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #10
19. Huh? He's been pointing out this EXACT scenario for 2 months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ampad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
11. There it is
Putting it into proper prospective. There is no mathematical way for her to overtake him, thank the gods.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunsetDreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
13. Checkmate Hillary, It's Over! We don't count popular vote in Primaries!
Edited on Tue Apr-22-08 10:27 PM by SunsetDreams
Congrats on your win in Pennsylvania, but you didn't win where or by what percentage you needed too.

There's no argument to even make about the big states either, because you can't say Obama won't win them in the GE.

It's over!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
14. so the 'Pelosi' Super Delegates are already for Obama
just waiting for the formality - Oregon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GetTheRightVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
17. go Obama go, general elections coming to you and me soon, very soon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC