Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senator Obama has to win both North Carolina and Indiana on May 6 to remain viable

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Tropics_Dude83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 03:45 PM
Original message
Senator Obama has to win both North Carolina and Indiana on May 6 to remain viable
In fact, I would say he needs to win by at least 8 in North Carolina and by 2.5 in Indiana to have a solid case to make to the superdelegates. If he can win a hotly and closely contested state like Indiana, it'll show that he has resilience and can bounce back. It will also prove that the "demography is destiny" theme state by state is correct; thus explaining Hillary's win in PA.

I also think that he needs to at least encroach on Senator Clinton's core constituencies in these 2 states.

If he loses Indiana and wins North Carolina based on his traditional base, any reasonable uncommitted superdelegate would have to assume that he has serious electability issues and vote for Clinton.

Clinton has proved that she is eminently electable by winning the big states. Now, it's time for Obama to show that he's electable by winning a too close to call contest. If not, his candidacy is in peril.

Also, yesterday's PA exit polls show why HRC is more electable at this point in time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. He'll win by double-digits in NC.... and all he has to do it tie (within 3% either way) in Indiana..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
19. SUSA has it in single digits... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #19
27. I didn't say it was double-digits now.... she won't spend any time there, she'll be focused on IN.


She can only afford to work one state or the other. She'll choose the one she has a chance in.... Indiana.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GetTheRightVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. I see you have been drinking the Koo-Aid as well,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. "Obama to show that he's electable by winning a too close to call contest."


Missouri

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. and when Hillary wins Neptune, she will wrap it all up n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Larkspur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. No, it's Uranus that she needs to win
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 03:51 PM
Original message
I was going to say Uranus, but I didn't wanna offend you
Edited on Wed Apr-23-08 03:52 PM by SoCalDem
:rofl::P:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. Just like Hillary had to win PA by double digits to remain viable
but she didn't.

and Hillary is not more electable.

She can't win Big Cities which is how Democrats win Big states.

So you are just really wrong all the way around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 03:48 PM
Original message
Guess What. He doesn't have to win a flippin' thing
That's how far ahead he is. And guess what else, he's going to win NC, OR, MT, SD and probably IN. You're suggesting we give her the nomination when she's only won 14 states??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. Which big state are you saying Obama can't win? And if HRC can't win big cities how will she win big
states in the general? That is, using your logic, of course.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
8. "yesterday's PA exit polls show why HRC is more electable at this point in time."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
9. I agree, but I fully expect Clinton to try and take this to the Convention
even if he wins by a blow out

I hope I am wrong


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iwasthere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
10. Goalposts have been moved soooo many times.....
The posts must be worn to nubs by now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tropics_Dude83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. A pledged delegate lead obtained in February will be....
irrelevant by June 5th. House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer stated today that electabilty is his key concern. That's what the superdelegates will be basing their decisions on.

That said, the math is still bad for Clinton even with superdelegates added unless you make 2,208 the magic number counting FL/MI voting in some capacity. I admit that.

Alas, the electoral college map is bad for Obama in November.

Clinton's map is better because she has strong GE support in Ohio, Florida and Pennsylvania. She wins just 2 of these and she is Madam President.

For me, it's that as much as I like Barack Obama, I'd rather win with Hillary than lose with Barack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Steny WHORE's concerns have nothing whatsoever to do with "electability"
They have to do with continuing the agenda of puke lite neoconservative bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #20
43. Ummmm
If the pledged delegate lead Obama has obtained is irrelevant, then why did/are we spending all this money on primaries and caucuses?

She doesn't have "strong GE support" in any of those states, by the way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MattBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #20
48. Wrong wrong wrong
Edited on Wed Apr-23-08 04:18 PM by MattBaggins
The very metrics you Hillary followers use against Obama's wins in southern states applies as well to OH and PA.

Hillary failed miserably in securing the needed city votes in the big states. Just like the nation each state is made up of red and blue counties. All Hillary managed to do was win in counties that will turn on her faster than a hungry alligator. Every county she won in OH and PA will vote for McCain come November and Hillary will fail utterly trying to "triangulate" a win from a base of voters pissed off at her.

Obama on the other hand starts with the cities in the bag and has to reach out to the independents in the suburbs. Yes the independents you know them? The ones Hillary gets some of her highest unfavorability ratings from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #10
51. They mounted them on a handy set of wheels after Super Tuesday. (NT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
11. I'm really glad you have turned coat to Hillary. You were giving Obama supporters a bad name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeanGrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
12. ROTFLMAO!! You guys are too much...............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
13. HRC is 14-30. If this was baseball, she'd be in LAST PLACE.
Don't worry. Obama WILL win both Indiana and North Carolina.

HRC is about as electable as a pile of rotten fish.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
14. Hillary Clinton has to win both North Carolina and Indiana or else she is out.
Edited on Wed Apr-23-08 03:54 PM by Pirate Smile
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
15. You know this reminds me of a high school basketball game I went to
Out team was leading by 20 points. One of our players shot an airball. The other side's fans starting taunting "Air-ball, air-ball, air-ball..." So our fans chanted back, "score-board, score-board, score-board...", as we all pointed towards the scoreboard that showed the only result that counted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmperorHasNoClothes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
16. If only North Carolina and Indiana matter, and none of the previous contests
then why the hell did they spend all that time and money on those contests? Heck, we should have just cut to the chase and let Indiana and North Carolina decide our candidate for us!

Hillary has already lost. She just hasn't accepted that fact yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
17. serious electability issues
Neither of them have "serious electability issues". This whole bullshit about Obama can't win here or there is whining speculation. Unless you have some info saying that not a single Hillary supporter will vote for Obama if he gets the nod. Same goes for her. These races are between 2 democrats. All these dire predictions of who can do what are nothing but peoples opinions and fantasies.

In spite of what people on DU say, McCain is a dead horse. The guy can't open his mouth without saying something stupid. Americans are voting on 3 issues. The war, which McCain wants to continue for 100 years. The economy, in which McCain's plan is more tax breaks for the wealthy. And Health care which McCain's plan is.. well he thinks health care in America is just fine. McCain is against the American people on every issue that is important. People need to quit the Chicken Little crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
18. If Hillary loses either she is done. She has to win em all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #18
34. Not just win them:
Win them BIG.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
21. He already won MO. He already encroached on his opponents core constituency in PA and WI.
Edited on Wed Apr-23-08 03:56 PM by John Q. Citizen
He's leading in pledged delegates, contests won, and popular vote.

He already won Texas, a big state and IL, a big state.

Obama will have won a majority of the pledged delegates on May 20th.

Obama will be the next president of the US. That will convince you, maybe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
22. It's Hillary who has to win them nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PetrusMonsFormicarum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
23. Wishful thinking
and you're gonna piss off them small states if you keep comparing sizes.

Obama in Indiana: by 4 points
North Carolina: double digits fer Obama
Oregon: Obama landslide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
25. Hate to burst your bubble:
If the superdelegates were to split 50-50, Obama needs to get 40% in every upcoming election in order to get to 2025.

In other words, he could get EATEN ALIVE and still be the nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tropics_Dude83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. But he'd be WEAK and you ignore the possibility of en masse SD endorsements
We might see 70% or more of the remaining superdelegates go with one candidate or the other.

He encroached on her constituencies in WI and VA before his campaign hit a rough patch. Let's see him do it after.

That said, if he wins both NC and Indiana, my doubts about him will vanish. It'll be the first too close state he won since Super Tuesday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. Not going to happen. The remaining uncommitted SDs can't stand her......
...much like most of the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #30
37. He'd be WEAK if that happened, yeah
but it's not going to happen. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tropics_Dude83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
26. 40% of HRC PA voters will vote for Mccain per exits
I used to think that Obama was right when he said that he can easily win her supporters while she can't get his. I think it's actually the other way around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Those numbers are soft and won't hold.... by Nov, they'll vote Dem.....


If you believe those exit polls will hold for November, you're smoking something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #28
59. Why do you think that? History proves that large numbers of Democrats have no problem
ditching their party and contributing to huge GOP electoral landslides.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #26
50. That is their choice..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
29. Hey Benedict! Remember your prediction about Obama's polling?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourguide Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
31. HRC has to win every remain race at 68% to remain viable
and catch up in delegates.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tropics_Dude83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. pledged delegates not overall delegates
That's a key distinction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #32
41. How so?
:shrug:

And how is she going to do that? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourguide Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #32
47. no, that includes supers...DO THE MATH!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
35. Wow you sure are brain dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
36. How is Hillary more electable when she is broke???
If I am a SD I am going to look at the fact that Obama is loaded with cash for the general and he can win states like Colorado and Virginia.

Howard Deans 50 state strategy is working and your DLC types just can't wrap your heads around running a campaign in "red" states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MattBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
38. What planet do you come from?
He could lose all the remaining contests and still have more pledged delegates. Sorry for you but Hillary has to make the case why she lose yet still be given the nomination.

I know this is very very difficult for many of you, but Hillary is not winning. She is not the front runner. She is in fact losing. The onus is on her to beg the SDs not Obama.

Besides when it comes to the convention and she is behind in PDs and pop vote her argument is going to be some version of Jackson_Dem's "ahh you know the white problem?" meme anyway. That one won't fly further than 50 pound canonball launched from a potato gun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndependentDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
39. hmm, so Obama is the underdog again and "has to win". I love how it bounces back and forth...
How about this: Clinton has to win all remaining states by at least 30% to take the lead in pledged delegates and have a solid case to make to the superdelegates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knixphan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
40. He can go 50% all the way, and be fine.
Fund-raising? he blows her away...

New voter recruits and expansion of Dean's 50-state strategy? blows her away...

Just needs to have more delegates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. You're wrong.
He could go 40% and be fine. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. yes, you're correct. He only has to lose by ten points in all remaing states to win
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #45
49. Isn't 40-60 losing by 20 points?
:shrug: :P

(And by the way, this discussion is entirely academic. He's going to beat HER by 20+ in Montana, South Dakota, and Oregon, 10+ in North Carolina, probably draw it in Indiana, and probably lose by 15 or so in Kentucky and West Virginia.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #49
53. lol, yeah, you're right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knixphan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #42
58. :)
That's 'wrong I can believe in'!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
44. wow, I want what you guys are smokin!
hey cheech! pass the clip!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
46. Boy, the next few weeks oughtta be great...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
52. Your logic amazes me - so if Obama wins NC and IN by 2 percent each - so he is not viable
and Hillary behind by around 150 delegates is viable? Are you Mark Penn? The exit polls show nothing about the general election match up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
54. Asinine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
55. Keep dreaming, Obama will be the nominee when you wake up.
NT!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
56. lol thanks for the laugh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
57. codswallop
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thevoiceofreason Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
60. I have a book for you - "Statistics for Dummies"
Not that you are a dummy, it's really the name of the book.

What type of fermented beverage would you like with your cheese?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC