Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What Do You Think Should Be Done About Michigan & Florida?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 07:41 PM
Original message
What Do You Think Should Be Done About Michigan & Florida?
I didn't want to do a poll because I don't think I'd make enough choices, because I happen to think there are many that can be made.
For me, and I'll say right here, I don't know too much about the situation, just that Obama was not on the Ballot in Michigan and both Clinton & Obama were on the ballot in Florida.

I would like Michigan to seat a percentage of delegates, based on the votes that were cast. The percent of eligible voters who voted would determine the number of delegates for each candidate. Those who didn't vote, or were "uncomtittnd," could still vote for the candidate of their choice, and that would determine where the remainder of delegates go.

For Florida, since bother Clinton & Obama were on the ballot, seat the Florida delegates.


Just my thoughts, nothing more, nothing less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
iamthebandfanman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. nothing
Edited on Thu Apr-24-08 07:42 PM by iamthebandfanman
you cant change things because you dont like it... not this late in the game.

this discussion should have been had and resolved BEFORE there was any vote, but it wasnt.

so too bad, so sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I Think MI & FLA Will Bite Us In November If We Do Nothing
And that could hurt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. As has been mentioned in previous posts, it will have to be something that....
both candidates can live with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Yup
Whatever that is? (I sure don't know).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamthebandfanman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. only if everyone continues to make a big deal outa it.
if someone in the party would just drop the subject (COUGH COUGH HILLARY COUGH COUGH) i doubt there will be any backlash from it..

ur either going to vote for a democrat or vote for the same ole thing weve had the last 8 years.

if the primary makes people not vote, then maybe they shouldnt anyway... cause thats a lame issue to base such a big decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. I Agree, It Might Be Lame
But if they aren't at the convention, they won't be happy, that's for sure. And that attitude, in my opinion, wouldn't bode well for our party in November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. 50/50, both states
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamjoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. Seat The Delegation...BUT
seat the delegation, but each vote only counts as half.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunsetDreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
32. wrong place delete
Edited on Thu Apr-24-08 08:25 PM by SunsetDreams

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. Seat Florida. Revote Michigan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
6. Seat the delegations and let them caucus and come up with their own damn solution.
That will keep them distracted until the thing is over
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GarbagemanLB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
7. Nothing. Hillary had a gigantic advantage in Florida with her name recognition and
the voters there were told beforehand that their votes wouldn't count, so who knows how many people didn't vote because of that. In Michigan Obama wasn't even on the ballot.

Both state legislatures broke the rules, and the voters of those states should hold THEM accountable. I am sick of this 'blame the DNC!' bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I Don't Blame The DNC Like The repuke Legislatures In Each State
(If I am right on that.*)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #9
25. You're half right
The Dems went along with the Repukes. I blame the state Dems more than anyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #9
40. Florida is Repuke controlled, Michigan has a Dem Governor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldgrowth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
8. Florida 50/50 Re-vote Michigan.nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olkaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
10. Seat Florida 50/50, Caucus Michigan
So we don't have any more of that Operation Dipshit going on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
11. Seat Florida and penalize them with a 50% loss of delegates.
Michigan should have a caucus, paid jointly by the DNC and MI Democratic Party. Seat the delegation according to the results of the caucus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. Caucuses are built to disenfranchise minorities. Vote on paper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #18
44. There is not enough time or $$$ to conduct a primary at this stage.
It's got to be a quick and dirty caucus or nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
15. They were two illegitimate elections
I think delegates will end up being seated and I think they should be. The question is are they certified after there is a nominee or before? My preference, if this comes before there is a nominee, is that the delegates be awarded by the DNC, half to each candidate, so that the election results in either case are not honored, since the elections weren't sanctioned, but the states have their delegates. Michigan shouldn't be treated any differently than Florida. They both broke the rules. (Believe it or not, I would say the same if it were Obama in Clinton's position with these states.) I think what's most important is that the party rules be respected by all concerned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BklynChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
16. split in down the middle, seat the delegates
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
17. What the point of rules without consequences???
FL and MI both broke the rules knowing full well what they were doing.
Now they are daring us to punish them. Fuck the arrogant bastages.
If the people want to change things, they should be storming their legislatures.
They elected those bums.... they can throw them out.
No sympathy for cheaters.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. I Know, But I Just Wish There Was A Way To Make Them "Pay" Without Hurting The Democratic Party
As far as I know, it was repuke legislatures who did this. (If I'm wrong on that, please correct me.) At the very least, the voters in MI & FLA should vote out the bums who screwed this up, whether they are repuke, Dem, or otherwise. I think they can still do this, at least with some of those idiots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. So do I, so do I
but i don't know.... 50 50 doesn't seem right...
seat them but take their votes away???
Y'know these clowns can't set precedent or every other state is gonna be pulling the same shenanigans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
20. Seat Florida and Revote Michigan as soon as possible before convention. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Secret_Society Donating Member (466 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
21. Seat both...can't afford to piss off swing states
Possibly punish by only seating half like the Republicans did with Florida
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
22. Same thing that's being done now, not a damn thing. Why reward those that don't want to play.......
by the rules, and spare me the disenfranchisement diatribes. The Democratic leaders of both states should of thought about it before they almost all (in Fl it was all but one Democrat) voted for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #22
30. I Think This Might Be Like Cutting Of One's Nose To Spite The Face
Something has to be done (punish), but not in a way that hurts the person who doesn't deserve it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gsaguyCLW54 Donating Member (178 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
24. Anything suggested that does not benefit Obama is a racist solution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
27. Why fix wasn't isn't broken?
The State Conventions deliberately chose to break the rules, and they knew full well what the consequences for breaking them would be. Hillary and Obama both agreed to abide by the rules and not participate (although Hillary left her name on the ballot in Michigan, and thus broke her pledge as well...and, that pledge was made too late for anyone to remove their names from the Florida ballot.)

Hillary should not now be rewarded for MI & FL (and, her own, IMO) shenanigans.

Rules are not made to be broken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quakerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 08:09 PM
Original message
Simple
For expediency, 50/50 on the delegates. 0/0 on the superdelegates.

All involved parties knew beforehand that the votes were invalid. Both of the remaining candidates agreed to that. Thus the votes that have occurred are no different than any other pre-election poll, aside from having a larger sampling size.

Thus, if we do not want to do the expedient thing, and the involved local politicians(and the hillary campaign) step back and allow it, the way to go is most likely a modified caucus, mainly due to a cost standpoint. I would suggest a "show up whenever, write down your vote, and go" caucus, or Caucus in Name Only.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
featherman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
28. Seat the delegations... "no vote on the first ballot" as penalty
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thoughtcrime1984 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
29. They should both have a firehouse caucus and count 1/2 delegates. NO SUPER D's
The cost to be shared by the DNC and the states. There HAS to be a penalty for gaming the elections. Rules are NOT made to be broken. This way they can count somewhat, and if it is important to count, than these states will agree to foot half the bill with the DNC, although I realize it'll be tough to get the FL Gov. and Repubs in both state legislatures to go along. If they are counted as they were, it'd be a damn travesty, the cheating would be validated, even rewarded with full delegates and the publicity of "defeating" the "evil" DNC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
31. They should be seated
all for Obama. That's fair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunsetDreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
33. 50/50 Just like the RNC...with no Popular vote awarded(with a long explanation)
Edited on Thu Apr-24-08 08:43 PM by SunsetDreams
Florida and Michigan broke the rules, the other 48 states did not.

They voted 115-1 in Florida to move their primary up, DNC warned them last summer if they did that, they would lose their delegates. ALL Candidates agreed to it! Hillary signed an agreement just like everyone else. She is even on video saying they won't count for anything. The blame first and foremost rests with those states parties. They chose to ignore the warning. 48 other states followed the rules, hence they will be punished by not being able to decide the outcome of the election. If they had stayed where they were, they would have been fine. It is Florida and Michigans fault period! Not their voters, but their Parties! They will be seated, Howard Dean has already said so, but they will be severely penalized to the point they don't effect the results. You don't reward states for bad behavior, otherwise it would cause chaos in future elections, if states could decide that they could do whatever they wanted to.

Hillary only decided to scream disenfranchisement, when she decided she was losing and would need those votes. Barack was not even on the ballot in Michigan. Both of these states have had voters publicly say that they knew the votes wouldn't count for anything because thier parties said so, and there were notifications up in the polling places. You cannot accurately judge a voters intention in that situation, because they know it won't count. Furthermore, there were many who stayed home, it is HIGHLY unfair to them to not be included. It is in the courts and has been turned down by appeal. Michigan has already went through the oourt system, where the judge said the vote was unconstitutional and would not be counted. Howard Dean has offered revotes in both states, and was turned down, due to money reasons, and more than likely selfishness. The people calling the shots in both states, support Hillary. They have an agenda, that is clear.

They will be counted this summer, but not in the way they existed in those "mock" vote totals. They were illegitimate period. They will be penalized, like it or not, to respect the integrity of the rules, that both states knew they were violating, but did it anyway.

Hillary will not win on this. The courts have already turned it down, and will continue to do so in Florida no matter what kind of lame excuse they come up with, such as their latest whining fit that the DNC is discriminating against white voters. That will get laughed out of court, because you cannot tell me that Florida is nothing but white voters, and frankly it is rather discriminatory of them to pretend otherwise. This is nothing but a game to them, and it will be denied. If FL doesn't have money for a recount for their voters, how do they have money for all these bogus lawsuits?

As for offering money for a recount, that is like buying votes from Hillarys' campaign. The attorneys involved said so, it doesn't fly. Their parties screwed up, it has nothing to do with the DNC period!
They also wanted to pay for a mail in vote, but BOTH Michigan and Florida decided it was not possible due to time contraints and how would it be measured for accuracy, who would over see it? It would take several elections to work out all the kinks and bugs.

As for Hillary, she is stirring things up just because she is losing. She agreed to it. Aug, Sept, Oct, Nov, Dec, Jan, and part of February, she never uttered a word. If she thought they were being disenfranchised she should have opened her mouth. If Sen. Obama has "won" those "mock" votes, she wouldn't have been arguing for them. If anyone thinks otherwise, they are sadly mistaken. Hillary only cares about political expediency period.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
34. Saw 'em off and set 'em afloat.
That way the Yoop can become a state.

NGU.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CalGator Donating Member (517 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
35. they had their chance for a revote
it didn't happen, and both states gleefully moved the primaries up despite the DNC threat. What should we do about them? Nutin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kevinbgoode Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
36. And what about the people who didn't vote because they knew
the primary wasn't going to count?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
37. Nobody can agree so why ask us?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosemary2205 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
38. We may have to eat them since Costco is all out of rice.
You know this would be a total non issue if Hillary were way out front.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunsetDreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. exactly
She wouldn't be making it an issue if Obama had won the "mock" votes, she is pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
39. They could mate.




Hey, it might fit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
42. Divide it totally equal, right down the middle...
which makes it a draw and is the only fair to go since these two states didn't follow the rules. It would still give the delegates (the voters) a seat but not give either candidate an advantage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ileus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
43. Seat them both...we need Hillary this fall!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC