Well, in another case of moving the goalposts, Hillary is now stating that the super delegates should vote for the person who wins the most popular votes, never mind the pledged delegate count. Further compounding that move, she is now blatantly lying and stating that she currently has the most popular votes. How does she come to this laughable conclusion? By counting the popular votes she won in Florida and Michigan. Yep, that's right, by counting the votes of two states which were disqualified, which according to party rules can't seat delegates. Furthermore, neither candidate campaigned in these two states, and Obama, but not Hillary, withdrew his name from the Michigan ballot. Essentially Hillary ran unopposed in Michigan, so naturally she would receive more votes.
But to contend that the popular votes from these two contested primaries should be counted as is is ludicrous. First of all by doing so Hillary will be going against the rules of the party, and her own stated word. Second of all, counting the votes in an disqualified primary is disingenuous, it isn't a true reflection of the people's preferences in either state.
But what's really disturbing is that this is simply one more indication that Hillary is willing to win by any means possible, even if it means breaking the rules, disenfranchising voters, and going against her own party. And if, by doing this, she gains the nomination, what she and her supporters seem unable, or unwilling to comprehend, is that she will be pissing off a large amount of voters who would otherwise vote Democratic, and thus throw the election to McCain.
Look, if Hillary wants to stick through with this thing until the bitter end, fine, that's her right. If she wants to make the case that the super delegates should vote the way of the popular vote, fine. But don't go lying and trying to manipulate the popular vote in order to steal the primary. That's wrong, and that will doom us to McCain. Hell, I think that having the SD's go with the popular vote rather than the delegate count will do the same. But the fact of the matter now is that Obama is ahead in both delegates and the popular vote(by 500,000). Hillary should play tough, but fair, and not sacrifice the party on the altar of her greed, ego and ambition.
<
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/25/us/politics/25campaign.html?_r=1&ref=politics&oref=slogin>