Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cintons arguments are a complete falacy, She can not win in the GE !

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 04:19 PM
Original message
Cintons arguments are a complete falacy, She can not win in the GE !
Edited on Fri Apr-25-08 04:34 PM by Egnever
Hillary has a problem with open primaries. Her argument at the moment seems to hinge on the idea that she is the better GE candidate but when the contests were open to all as they will be in the GE she doesn't fair so well at all. How she gets away with the I am more electable argument at all is beyond me.

I got these numbers from CNN

*Arkansas open O 26% C 70%
*California semi open O 43% C 52%
*Mass semi open O 41% C 56%
*New Jersey semi open O 44% C 54%
*Ohio open O 44% C 54%
*Rhode Island semi open O 40% C 58%
*Tennessee open O 41% C 54%
*Texas semi open O 47% C 51%


Alabama open O 56% C 42%
Georgia open O 67% C 31%
Hawaii open O 76% C 24%
Idaho open O 79% C 17%
Illinois open O 65% C 33%
Minnesota open O 66% C 32%
Mississippi open O 61% C 37%
Missouri open O 49% C 48%
New Hampshire semi open O 37% C 39%
North Dakota open O 61% C 37%
South Carolina open O 55% C 27%
Utah semi open O 57% C 39%
Vermont open O 59% C 39%
Virginia open O 64% C 35%
Wisconsin open O 58% C 41%
Wyoming open O 61% C 38%

Total Clinton 8 Obama 16
total with only open primaries or caucuses so far Clinton 4 Obama 14

Her whining about cacusses is also a complete falacy.

most of the open elections Obama won were primaries.

Alabama
DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY February 05, 2008
Open primary: 60 total delegates*

Georgia
DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY February 05, 2008
Open primary: 102 total delegates*

Illinois
DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY February 05, 2008
Open primary: 184 total delegates*
153 tied to February 5 primary, 31 superdelegates

Mississippi
DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY March 11, 2008
Open primary: 40 total delegates*
33 tied to March 11 primary, 7 superdelegates

Missouri
DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY February 05, 2008
Open primary: 88 total delegates*
72 tied to February 5 primary, 16 superdelegates


South Carolina
DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY January 26, 2008
Open primary: 54 total delegates*
45 tied to January 26 primary; 9 superdelegates

Utah
DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY February 05, 2008
Semi-open primary: 29 total delegates*
23 tied to February 5 primary, 6 superdelegates

Vermont
DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY March 04, 2008
Open primary: 23 total delegates*
15 tied to March 4 primary, 8 superdelegates

Virginia
DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY February 12, 2008
Open primary: 101 total delegates*
83 tied to February 12 primary, 18 superdelegates

Wisconsin
DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY February 19, 2008
Open primary: 92 total delegates*
74 tied to February 19 primary, 18 superdelegates


They have each won 15 primaries at this point 10 of his wins were open primaries while only 8 of hers were. So your story is completely full of holes except for the idea that clinton cant win a caucus in the whole contest she has won one, Nevada and even in that one she walked away with less delegates.

So in conclusion he has won just as many primaries as she has and he has won more of the ones that were open as the GE will be. The only time she can win is when it is limited to just Dem's or she lived in the state. Her chances in the GE are pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. With negatives above 50%, and over 60% consider her a liar, she's toast
Why some refuse to see this I'll never understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Birthmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. "Either" is the important word.
It makes no difference to me who the losing candidate is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ashy Larry Donating Member (900 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I think the "either" is sarcastic mocking in this case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Thanks for pointing that out
I was refering to her not being able to win either the GE or the primaries but I can see where it might confuse people so I will edit it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Birthmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Okay.
Question: How is Obama gonna rope in all those pissed off Clinton voters in the GE?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Gramma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I'd guess the same way we Deaniacs supported Kerry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Birthmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. That wasn't as nasty as this.
It also was far more brief. And, I hesitate to say it for several reasons, but I think Dean is a better team player than Clinton. I wouldn't take a bet as to whether she'll even endorse Obama.

I just think that this has escalated to the point where it's beyond fixing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Gramma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Well, let's look at it mathematically
Not all Clinton supporters are so rabid they'd support McCain rather than the Democrat. I think the Pennsylvania polling was 47%, so half of them would vote Dem even if it isn't their candidate. That means we need to register new voters and pull in independents and crossovers in an unprecedented
quantity. I'm willing to work on that, and I think many other Obama supporters would also be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Birthmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Good luck to you.
That looks like a pile of work. If only one-tenth of Clinton voters simply stay home, that'll be almost insurmountable. Add that to a smaller number that will vote for McCain and it looks utterly impossible.

I still think a compromise candidate is a better way to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Window Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. If they don't want a president McWar, they will vote Democratic.
Plus, maybe all the new folks in the party will cancel them out. Who knows.

I think Sen. Obama will fare better than Hillary would in the GE, since she'd be pissing off an entire race and new registrants (if she managed to win in an unacceptable manner). Not to mention the GOP are salivating to run against Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Birthmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. I think most people out there think it's war...
...no matter who is President.

Whether Obama does better than Clinton is irrelevant. What matters is if he can do better than McCain. Under the circumstances, I don't think he can. The Clinton's aren't a forgiving bunch, imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. Honestly I dont think he has to
If you look at the voting totals state by state and compare them to the pukes he can lose those 20% of clinton supporters and still win handily in most states.

So much as I would like them to face reality and get behind our nominee if they dont and carry a grudge I dont think it will have any effect other than tightening the race slightly. He should still blow Mcsame out of the water despite them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yossariant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
10. Obama 264, Clinton 284. I got these numbers from a VERIFIABLE LINK:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. A verifiable link? Half of the polls are months old
And it ignores the fact that we arent even running against mcsame yet. The second we start actually campaigning against him his numbers will drop like a rock.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
15. Excellent post, Egnever
Recommended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azmouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
16. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC