Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Howard Dean must know something is in the wind, because today

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
BenDavid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 12:23 AM
Original message
Howard Dean must know something is in the wind, because today
he made the following statement: "super delegates do have the right to overthrow the popular vote and elect the best candidate to go up against John McCain."

I reckon it looks as though HRC will make a play for those super delegates when she goes ahead and wins 6 to 7 more of the states.

Shalom
Ben David
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. That is actually bad
because Hillary is claiming that she's winning the popular vote. It's her last argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Genevieve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. obviously! .nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
3. We have got the point ...3rd posting...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moochy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 02:33 AM
Response to Reply #3
22. 3 Posts a Day Thats All We Ask! oh and $5
Edited on Sat Apr-26-08 02:34 AM by Moochy
That clanking you hear is her mechanical supporters going through the motions, while she is merely hoping to defray the debt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ron Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
4. There is the smell of horseshit in the wind, but I'm not sure Dean is focused on that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
5. And she ain't going to win those states...Lotta people mad at her....
disgusted, even....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
6. As the sand slips through the hourglass of the 2008 nomination for Sen.
Clinton, she finds herself trailing in delegates, failing to persuade super-delegates, and stinking up the joint with her gutter-level political tactics.

Also she's flat broke. In debt, in fact.

The longer she remains in the race the more clear it becomes that she's trying to trash Obama to position herself for a run in 2012, for which she will definitely NOT have my support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. OC! I get that reference!!
:hi: and :hug:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Hey there gately. Awful good to run into you tonight.
Here's a big hug right back, dammit. :hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Whew.... for a second there, I thought you were quoting Days of Our Lives
And were about to tell us that Hillary was secretly working with Stefano DiMera to manipulate the superdelegates. :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. LOL! She's working with Richard Mellon Scaife and Rupert Murdock to
subvert the Democratic Party, is what it looks like to me.

Also it sure has been quiet from Geraldine Ferraro's office of late. They sent a team over there to titrate her Lamictal so fast it would make yur head spin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Yeah, those guys are worse than the DiMeras
Hell, they might even be worse than the Sopranos. (Which I've never seen - HBO deprived)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 02:18 AM
Response to Reply #11
21. Now now, let's not be too hard on those of us on "The Lam"
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
7. Shalom. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
14. Full quote from today.....
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/3d03a310-12f7-11dd-8d91-0000779fd2ac.html?nclick_check=1

""However, he added that it was highly unlikely that the superdelegates – of whom roughly 300 out of 800 remain undecided – would go against whichever candidate was ahead on the popular vote and among pledged delegates in practice. “I think it is very unlikely – I have never seen it happen. In fact it has never happened. But it is possible and they have every right to do it."

He has to quote the rules and leave it to others to speculate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 02:15 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. He's corrected described the party rules. But I think the rules need to be changed in the future.
I would like to see this be a discussion for the future. I do not believe that the philosophy behind super delegates actually works appropriately in practice.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cassandra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #20
39. I think the original point behind having SDs...
was that if the popular candidate, selected early in the primary season, turned out to have some thoroughly unacceptable scandal in his/her past or present that precluded winning the WH, then the SDs would be able to legally pick a more acceptable candidate. I think the people that dreamed up that rule assumed that in those circumstances, the Democratic electorate would be relieved rather than angry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
judasdisney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 05:21 AM
Response to Reply #14
27. Wow -- so Ben David didn't give us the full info
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Umbram Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #27
51. I would have said "is a manipulative hack" but you said it nicer. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #27
52. Wow ...then I won't feel too bad about putting him my ignore dungeon.
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peoli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #14
46. Full quotes always make me feel better. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberaltrucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
15. A golden key to the WH for McSame
Edited on Sat Apr-26-08 12:44 AM by liberaltrucker
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. the OP misunderstood
Dean said this when the superdelegates met with Hillary. as noted above, her last argument is "popular vote." The superdelegates in DC said today that Hillary would not be the nominee because her negatives are so high she would rally the republican base... and endanger democratic seats in house and senate campaigns.

this is a one-two punch to say that she needs to accept that the campaign is over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
16. You're reading more into his statement that you should.
His statement was correct according to the Dem Party rules. PERIOD! That doesn't mean he knows anything that you or I don't. Howard has asked for the SDs to make their decision soon after the last primary votes are cast on June 3rd, and I agree with that. I can understand why some delegates want to wait to see how their district votes. After all, many of them are on the ballot too. I really believe the SDs will mostly vote the way their district did UNLESS some crazy thing (like an Elliott Spitzer scandal) happens before then. That's really the reason the SD rule was put there...to prevent a disaster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
18. Are the super delegates going to go for a pathalogical liar?
one that says she and mccain are qualified to be president, but not Obama

One whose campaign has helped propogate the Obama is a Muslum myth

One whose campaign has implied Obama wasn't patriotic enough

One who says Obama is outrageous when he said he would make a pinpoint attack in Pakistan, if intelligence indicated bin laden was at a specific location, but hardly blinks an eye saying she would not hesitate to NUKE Iran if they attacked Israel. Why nukes? hmmmmmm. Conventional weapons don't kill enough people for her

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
datopbanana Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 02:07 AM
Response to Original message
19. Ben. Dude. This is BAD for HRC. He is basically saying pop. doesn't matter. It would have been...
good for HRC if he said overturn pledged delegates....

pop vote is HRC's only argument at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 03:13 AM
Response to Original message
23. Shalom
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 03:21 AM
Response to Original message
24. Hillary Clinton will never be President
Edited on Sat Apr-26-08 03:21 AM by JackORoses
She has blown her chance.
Now she is only destroying the last remnants of her tattered reputation.

Shalom. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 03:27 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. Be'hatzlacha
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #25
31. In supporting Hillary Clinton, you have succumbed to your Yetzer Ha Ra
I pray for your Soul.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. So God wants Obama to be President?
(Like Bush supporters believed about Bush?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. who knows what God wants?
but the majority of Democrats in this Country want Obama.

He is appealing to the best in each of us,
as opposed to Hillary, who is appealing to the fearful, accusatory side of Humanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. Yeah...
You can tell by his supporters/fans/worshipers on DU, he CERTAINLY is

He is appealing to the best in each of us,...


Is this ---> :sarcasm: really even neccessary?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. I had the same reaction. /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #36
40. Well...Since I have been here a lot longer than you,
You will have to trust in my wisdom.

:rofl::rofl:

:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. You're the "older" twin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SwampG8r Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #31
53. owie
that one hurt me and im way over here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 04:49 AM
Response to Original message
26. bzzzzt. dream on hilldroid
hilly is done, and you left out the part of Dean's statement where he says that the SDs will likely go for the candidate with the most pledged delegates and the popular vote. that would not be hilly. Dean is being the fair referee he's been all through this process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #26
38. Hi cali
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guruoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 05:24 AM
Response to Original message
28. He's right, they can vote any way they want to.
That's the system. If you don't like it, change it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whirlygigspin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 05:48 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. that's right
they can vote for anyone

so I say: screw em all, vote Biden at the convention for a unity ticket

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guruoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 05:50 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. Yeah, Biden's da man!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SwampG8r Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #29
54. damn joe nice ride
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bensthename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
32. Don't look too deep into that statement
He was just saying they can vote however.. He did not act as if he knew something was about to happen..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
37. They certainly have the right to do that
Most likely, the Super Delegates will side overwhelmingly with whomsoever wins the most pledged delegates because, as Wolson said himself, this contest is about delegates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
41. I thought you were going to stop taking drugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
43. actually, no
Hillary is not what he meant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whatchamacallit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
44. All that's blowing in the wind is the stench of Hillary's political corpse.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoldieAZ49 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
45. and they can change their mind right up to the time of their vote, at the convention
We will have a nominee in August
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. And that nominee will be the man with the most pledged delegates.
There is NO WAY the SDs are going to tell Obama he has to move to the back of the bus and give Hillary the seat he won fair and square....

Not. This. Time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoldieAZ49 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #47
50. or not
:hi:

The are not beholden to anyone


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #47
57. Two huge fallacies:
Edited on Sun Apr-27-08 12:05 AM by Seabiscuit
1. "give Hillary the seat he won fair and square". Obama hasn't won any seat, and *can't* win the nomination based on either the popular vote count or the pledged delegate count. Because it's impossible for him to obtain 2025 pledged delegates by the end of the primary season in June. No one can take away from him something he doesn't have.

2. "There is NO WAY the SDs are going to tell Obama he has to move to the back of the bus". Disgusting racial barb. But more importantly, you apparently still don't know or refuse to acknowledge the FACT that since neither candidate can win the 2025 pledged delegates to clinch the nomination, the SDs are not bound by any numbers (they're already very close and will likely be even closer by August) when deciding which candidate has the best chance in their judgment to beat McCain. The numbers, whatever they are by then, are only one small factor among many they will be considering when the Convention arrives.

Since Obmanoids don't want to play by the rules they prefer to pretend they don't exist. It's a form of self-delusion born of arrogance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Dawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
48. And considering that Clinton is the worst candidate, rather than the best...
You have nothing to be excited about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
49. Overthrow the popular vote?
Oh THAT will go down really well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
55. do you have a link to where he said that? thanks.
Edited on Sat Apr-26-08 11:52 PM by annie1
i hope he added "and have the right to overthrow pledged dels in favor of pop vote". he and pelosi have worked my last nerve. i'm definitely going to unregister as a democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
56. "HRC will make a play for those super delegates"???
"Will"???

Both candidates have been making plays for the super delegates since this thing began, and will continue to do so right through the Convention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC