Where is the video of Olberman wishing harm upon Hillary?

[DS1]

Please post a link in a reply. Thanks.

[SunsetDreams]

1. He did no such thing

He basically said only one would emerge from the room as the winner

[Evergreen Emerald]

7. No. He said take her in a back room and HE emerges a winner.

[leftstreet]

23. So then DC "back room" deals are violent? Wow, I didn't know that

This could explain the random bruises on Bush's face though.

[backscatter712]

28. Oh my god, he used a male pronoun!

BURN HIM!!!

:eyes:

[Evergreen Emerald]

33. I sure wish you were that forgiving of language, and usage of terms

when you disect anything and everything Clinton says. The double standard again shows its ugly head.

He used the male pronoun to suggest that one person leaves alive--he did not use the male pronoun when both entered.

[DS1]

34. Oh noes! I can haz a grammar fight

she emerges a winner, obviously doesn't work
they emerge a winner is ambiguous
it emerges a winner is changing the entity to a non-human

he

oh, he

right. I guess that's the only viable option which makes any sense in the statement. So, let's add some beatings and murder just to make it clear.

:sarcasm:

[Evergreen Emerald]

35. Amazing gymnastics to avoid the reality of what was stated.

this coming from the crowd who disect everything Clinton says and twist into something negative. This coming from the same crowd who said elitist = uppity.
This coming from the same crowd who said that "fairy tale" is racist.

Double standards abound. When Clinton says it = evil. When anyone else says anything that could possibly be an attack on Clinton= molehill.

At least employ the same standards to both sides.

[DS1]

36. I'm being absolutely fair.

First, you're arguing against arguments based on what Clinton said, and using what an non-party entity said against her.
Second, you're using a false injection of suggestion to back it up, which is a poor and shaky base for your argument (or lack of argument, to be more accurate)
Third, you're throwing in a well-known attack of character by suggesting that people who argue against Clinton always use words such as "uppity"
Fourth, that only takes the mask off you, and you should just go all out and call him and uppity nigger who should know his place by now
Fifth, I can't imagine how or why anyone with a sense of reasoning would call "fairy tale" racist, unless there were perhaps some comments before or after "fairy tale" which you conveniently snipped out. Do I really go have to look up the quote, or will you acknowledge that you've aborted the statement which was originally in your favor, in order make it against you, and then complete the 360 and claim people using it must be bad and then must be in Clinton's favor?

And people wonder why they call it spin.

[Evergreen Emerald]

39. Racism, sexism and spin.

Nice. Call me a racist. Typical Obama—attack supporter: when anyone disagrees with you call them a racist. And in order to do that, you must twist and distort what I said to reach that conclusion. And you seem fully willing and able to make that leap.

But, to review a statement that may perhaps on some level, suggest that a Clinton supporter may have a point—you shut your eyes and close your ears and shout lalalala to avoid any agreement.

Olberman was out of line. And, as a woman who works with victims of violence, I see how our society reinforces the values that contribute to that violence. But instead of acknowledging that fact, you attack.

Uppity: When Obama sounded like an elitist Obama supporters said that suggestion was racist. When Clinton said that Obama’s claim that he was always against he war was a “fairy tale” you all shouted “Racism!” from the rooftops.

Spin? You are damn right it is spin. When Clyburn appears conveniently before SC and NC to shout “Racism!” that is spin.

When Olberman and Tweety and Shuster unveil themselves as the misogynists that they are that is a shame. When “progressives” on DU call people who disagree with them “Racist!” it is time to re-evaluate how you define progressive.

[RC]

27. And Olbermann was obviously talking about someone else hypothetically in the room.

He neither said nor implied physical harm to Hillary. If anyone gets anything other than that from watching the video, then they need a reality check. Either that or Rove spin, which in itself is reality deficient.

[leftstreet]

2. I'd like to see this, too

:shrug:

[DS1]

3. I've read about it countless times, and yet I'm still surprised to not see it

in the political videos forum.

[leftstreet]

6. You'd think it'd be a hot ticket!

;-)

[Aloha Spirit]

4. this?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZP4e28b9hpw

[Aloha Spirit]

5. @3:00

[leftstreet]

10. "Take her into a room and only he comes out" ? That's what this is about?

:shrug:

[Aloha Spirit]

12. Yes. I can offer no explanation.

[DS1]

9. watching now, thanks

[DS1]

14. Oh my God. That's what this is all about?

Abrahams wept :rofl:

[gateley]

18. Thanks for posting that SMOKING GUN vid --

:eyes: I hadn't seen it. Pretty anticlimactic from what I'd been led to expect.

Don't we have anything better to do than create outrages from thin air?

:hi:

[DS1]

31. Why can't it be fat air? Are you some kind of pro-thin voter?

:eyes:


;-)

[high density]

8. Where is the video of Bill O'Reilly raping that young child?

Please post a link in a reply. Thanks.

[DS1]

11. What the fuck are YOU talking about? If you have nothing, stay out of this

[high density]

15. I got the same question about the OP

I see you got the message.

[Name removed]

16. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[DS1]

38. You have no message, and deleted messages aside,

oh, you still have no message.

[AlCzervik]

19. what a disgusting mind you have, that was the first thing that popped into your head

sick.

[high density]

21. Give me a fucking break

It was sarcasm to show out how outrageous the OP's phrasing was. Like DS1 has never heard of a damn search engine before.

[DS1]

25. I've heard of the search engine, and have used it effectively

The problem is there's so much chaff floating around this topic it was difficult to pinpoint the actual video. As I suggested earlier, you'd think such a controversial video would be posted in the "Political Videos" forum. Either that forum is entirely run by Obamatrons, or the Clintonistas are too lazy or technically hobbled to do it themselves.

Or, it serves them no benefit to post it. Hmmm. :think:

[DS1]

22. It's so hypercynical I can't even tell which angle it's trying to come from

What a scumbag

[ZinZen]

13. Rachel Sklar

who is Huffington Post blogger had a major delusional hissy fit and alerted MSNBC to her delusional perception that Olbermann said Hillary needs to be beaten up physically to get out of the race. Sklar is a hyper Hillary supporter so this is no surprise.

[DS1]

17. God forbid there's a meeting involved

What kind of person injects physical violence into that statement?

[Aloha Spirit]

24. As a woman, I completely understand how people sometimes get oversensitized to stuff like this...

a lot of us have quietly suffered abuses, assaults and violations... it would be really easy, for example, for me to just assume that Men Suck. But, I have a highly developed critical thinking center (a brain) that prevents me from making such assumptions.

[DS1]

26. and therefore you rock

:hug:

[Aloha Spirit]

30. awww.

now I just have to convince some other ladies on DU that O is not the Big Mean Devil, and my work will be done.

[Adelante]

20. You'll never find it

It never happened.

[DS1]

29. I found it, thanks to a poster above

but there's really not that much there.

[Adelante]

37. He never wished harm on Hillary Clinton, though

He used a metaphor that fits in politics and was accused of promoting murder. As a feminist, I was embarrassed by the reaction.

[backscatter712]

32. Nothing but molehill politics.

Yet another triviality the Hill-bots are using to play gotcha.

:eyes:

[donheld]

40. Much ado about nothing.