Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

**Liz Sidoti (AP Writer), learn to do your homework.**

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Infinite Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 11:18 AM
Original message
**Liz Sidoti (AP Writer), learn to do your homework.**
Edited on Sat Apr-26-08 11:19 AM by Infinite Hope
WASHINGTON - Both parties count on victory in dozens of states that long have voted their way. The competition to reach the 270 electoral votes needed to win is expected to play out primarily in 14 states. All but one saw the greatest action in 2004. The exception is Virginia, a longtime Republican stronghold where Democrats have made inroads.

In 2004, Bush won 286 electoral votes to 251 for Kerry. This year's Democratic nominee must triumph in all the states Kerry won, and pick up 19 more votes to prevail — or come up with another game plan to reach the magic number. McCain, for his part, must fend off Democratic challenges to hang on to the GOP advantage.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080426/ap_on_el_pr/road_to270_3

-----

Think about it, Liz. Forget research, just use your common sense. Why does a candidate need 270 votes? Because 269 would be a tie. Add 269 and 269 and you get 538 total electoral votes. You said Bush had 286 and Kerry had 251. That's 537, not 538, so clearly your numbers are wrong. Where? Kerry had 252.

You clearly rushed through your article in the fashion of a hack, Liz. You were close, but as I always say close only counts in horse shoes, hand grenades, and presidential elections. Wait, Presidential elections? Maybe you close enough to count after all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. Technically, she was right due to a faithless elector in Minnesota.
However, Kerry won states with 252 EVs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Infinite Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. What was the issue with the MN elector? (Official totals are still 252). n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Actually, the way they were cast in the final count they voted for Edwards.
Apparently they were a moron. The official count in the Electoral College was 251 for Kerry even though he was legally entitled to the 252 since he should have gotten 10 in MN instead of 9.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Infinite Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Wow, just...wow. What was their explanation for voting for Edwards? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. There was really no reason given. It appeared to be an accident, but it could
not be overturned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. We can win with 269 EVs, because Democrats control Congress.
I hope Obama wins in a landslide, but if he gets 269 electoral votes and Congress votes him in, I won't be complaining.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC