Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Iowa District Convention Results April, 26, 2008

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 08:23 AM
Original message
Iowa District Convention Results April, 26, 2008
Total delegates including alternates:

Clinton 9
Edwards 4
Obama 21



IDP ANNOUNCES RESULTS FROM TODAY’S DISTRICT CONVENTIONS


Des Moines – The Iowa Democratic Party held its District Conventions today and Democrats elected 29 delegates and 5 alternates to represent Iowa at the National Democratic Convention in Denver. Iowa’s national delegation will consist of 57 delegates and 8 alternates. The District Conventions took place in Dubuque, Mount Vernon, West Des Moines, Boone, and Council Bluffs.


Chart of results here:

http://iowademocrats.org/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks for posting this - we didn't get home until midnight from 1st District
Convention (and we left early) (Obama 3, Clinton 2, Edwards 1 - Obama 1 Alternate)


http://www.wcfcourier.com/articles/2008/04/27/news/politics/10302371.txt


<snip>

Clinton Midwest chairman Jerry Crawford said Obama's loss of a delegate in eastern Iowa's 1st District shows Clinton gaining after her win in the Pennsylvania primary. "What we saw in Pennsylvania, which was the momentum shifting to Sen. Clinton and away from Sen. Obama, seems to have been at work today in Iowa as well," Crawford said.

A top Democrat, however, said the fact that support for the candidates changed little since the party's county conventions in March shows no one gaining much momentum. Former state Democratic chairman Dave Nagle of Cedar Falls said the results show Obama remains strong and Clinton is hanging on. Nagle said the fact one Obama delegate went to former candidate John Edwards instead of Clinton "is kind of a wash." "The Clinton people are looking for anything to hang their hat on," Nagle said. Superdelegates who remain undecided didn't get much help from the convention results, Nagle said.

"I think that they're going to have to look elsewhere for guidance because Iowa basically remains unchanged since the county conventions," Nagle said.

There are still 16 pledged delegates to be selected at the state convention on June 14 in Des Moines. Based on results from the county and district conventions, Obama has enough strength to capture eight of those, leaving five for Clinton and three for Edwards. If that holds, that would give Obama 24 of the state's pledged delegates going into the national convention, followed by Clinton with 14 and Edwards with seven.

<snip>



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. That's kind of confusing
Clinton's camp is claiming momentum for her based on a shift of one delegate from Obama to Edwards? Weird. Do you know if Clinton's supporters assisted any in making Edwards viable or anything? I'm trying to understand what went down with this. Thanks, Debi.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. You're dead on. Clinton supporters moved to Edwards after the first alignment
in order to make Edwards viable moving that one delegate from Obama to Edwards - and Clinton supporters are claiming that a victory (the Edwards delegate probably promised the Clinton folks that she would switch to Clinton at the National Convention).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Thanks
That explains it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDoorbellRang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. Now that's some spin! The Edwards delegate stayed with Edwards
and didn't move to Obama as expected from the district convention results. Now translated as Obama "lost" a delegate and Clinton gaining momentum. :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Well, had the Clinton supporters not gone to Edwards to make him viable
then the Edwards supporters would have had to go to Clinton or Obama. By the numbers if they had all gone to Clinton SHE would have gotten the extra delegate (THAT might have been seen as a win). Instead her supporters went to Edwards which really seems more of a wash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
4. Any word on resolutions at the district conventions?
Just curious...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Unfortunately we left the First District Convention before the platform was completed
I don't know what happened at the other four conventions - we're you looking for something specific? I can ask around or you can head over to the IA Forum - IA Duers have been asked to check in over there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Nothing specific, really, but...
...I was wondering if anyone took the "No Pardon for Bush" resolution and ran with it like the 16th Senatorial District did in Texas. Now that resolution is headed for the State Convention in Austin this coming June, and I can't wait for this to hit the floor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. I don't know - an investigation/impeachment plank was in the First District
but we left before it was brought to the floor. I hope to hear more from the other districts this week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
8. Here' another article on it -
http://www.desmoinesregister.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2008804270336

<snip>

But Obama received three of his total Saturday in Iowa's 1st Congressional District, where he was expected to receive four, based on projections from the county conventions.

Obama slipped by one delegate because Edwards had sufficient support in the district, where he was not expected to receive any delegates.

Edwards, who finished second in the caucuses, was also expected to receive no delegates in the 4th District, where he received none Saturday.

The shift was aided by Clinton supporters who agreed to support Edwards at the convention. Clinton had dispatched veteran Iowa organizer Teresa Vilmain, who ran Clinton's third-place Iowa caucus campaign, to the convention in Dubuque.

Crawford said Clinton supporters crossed over to boost Edwards' totals and deny Obama the fourth delegate.

<snip>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Not that it's an unusual thing, right?
I didn't remember ever hearing a campaign claim "momentum" for doing it, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BalancedGoat Donating Member (255 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. They're grabbing at anything they can right now.
What surprises me is that someone in her camp knew that math well enough to pull it off.

(Sorry, couldn't resist)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. Yeah, deals are struck all the time - it's nothing new
But moving one delegate, that is 'supposedly' going to Obama, over to Edwards isn't a BIG WIN - it's a neutral move.

Does anyone know NOW how many national delegates Edwards has now? Is it enough to make any impact at national convention?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BalancedGoat Donating Member (255 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. According to Wikipedia...
... the estimate is around 17 to 19. Don't know if that takes into account the shifts in Iowa. So, not enough to really make much of a difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Thanks, unless this race gets any tighter those delegates won't change
the final outcome. Now, if he had 200 delegates Edwards could do something, but 17 to 19? I doubt it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #10
16. Not unusual, well executed, but claiming momentum is pure spin n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
11. Thanks, Wesdem!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC