Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary Uses Holocaust Reference To Jobs Lost in Indiana

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 06:25 PM
Original message
Hillary Uses Holocaust Reference To Jobs Lost in Indiana
The New York Times reports from one of Hillary Clinton's campaign stops in Indiana, that she used the famous Niemoller quote as an allusion to jobs being lost in Indiana. The original quote from Niemoller goes like this:

“First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out, because I was not a Socialist,” goes the version inscribed on a wall at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington. “Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out, because I was not a Jew,” it continues.


The way Hillary Clinton took this quote and altered it is listed below in the excerpt:

Mrs. Clinton’s version went like this: “They came for the steel companies and nobody said anything,” she intoned. “They came for the auto companies and nobody said anything. They came for the office companies, people who did white-collar service jobs, and no one said anything. And they came for the professional jobs that could be outsourced and nobody said anything. So this is not just about steel,” she finished.


I thought the use of the Niemoller quote in this way was rather classless. Equating the lives of six million Jews lost in the Holocaust with factories going overseas?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hillary+NAFTA=perfect attack ad
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. She was 1st Lady and Senator. Did she "say anything"? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I don't think so
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Yes she did. But now, she's saying she didn't say what she did.
In other words, we was one of the "THEY" that comes for you.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. her husband was the one that lobbied for NAFTA to pass. He came after those people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #8
56. She left out that...
they came for our young men and women for an illegal war and hillary said YES,YES,YES...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. Bingo.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
39. Uh, Hillary your husband was president when the steel industry collapsed .
He wouldn't impose tariff's to protect it from foreign competition because it was against WTO rules.

Obama should remind people of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #39
44. Yes, he should.
She's leaving herself sooo open. I'm wondering if she wants Obama to attack her, or thinks he won't attack her or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #44
70. I was thinking the same thing...She wants him to attack!!
My guess is that everyone sees how she bloodied him up in PA, and that she's behaving
like a loony toon ("I'm really winning!"), so if she attacks him---she'll suffer for it.

However, if she can get Obama to attack her---she can come back swinging at him and defend
herself and then step up more attacks.

She'll make it look like he started the attacks, and well....if he's an attack dog, then
she should be able to be an attack dog too!

In my opinion, she just needs to STFU. I really have no patience for her anymore.

It's useless to respond to sheer lunacy that makes no sense. It just needs to stop.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #39
60. that should be an important reminder
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spoony Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. You've got to be fucking joking.
If you really think that's what she was doing, you've gone beyond partisanship and into full on stupidity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeff30997 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. What was she referring to?
The Bhagavad Gita ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spoony Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. So, you really think, your political aims aside
that she was, "Equating the lives of six million Jews lost in the Holocaust with factories going overseas?" Instead of, oh I don't know, using a familiar (and way over-used) saying that is quite often co-opted by all sorts of people for all sorts of causes? Really now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #22
36. yes, it's a very bad construct she used
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nebula Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. The worst dem candidate in US history

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeff30997 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
21. Bwahahahaah!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChimpersMcSmirkers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
46. Oh my, that's a scorcher...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lady-Damai Donating Member (756 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
67. Thanks for the pic...

n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. Well, nobody in her crowd "said anything"
The elite never do. But there were plenty of people saying things when they came after the mills and the working people.

What a stupid, out of touch thing to say.

Nobody said anything? Sheesh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. um.....when she says NOBODY said anything
that kind of includes her doesn't it? :o
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I believe that it does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. I never heard that much from ANYONE, just like she says
Edited on Sun Apr-27-08 06:32 PM by Skittles
they're now squawking about the effects but to see people campaigning on what they WILL do, knowing none of them did much of ANYTHING - it is truly sickening
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
10. And Bill signed the legislation that opened the gates for "they."
Hillary did not speak out about alot--then and recently. Remember IWR?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Obama should hit her on that.
Edited on Sun Apr-27-08 06:30 PM by anonymous171
"She had the chance to say something, but didn't. In fact, she supported the administration's efforts."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. that should be a TV ad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #14
29. He knows better than to do that,
given his own support for "free trade" and the fact that he has the likes of Austan Goolsbee whispering in his ear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. you also forget that same story mentioned that Obama would put environmental and labor protections
on any renegotiation of free trade deals. Also, that Clinton campaign contacted Canada about this too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #31
37. Bill Clinton also said he would add labor & enviro. protections to trade deals.
We can see how well that worked out.

Neither candidate has any room to be talking about the impact of so-called "free trade." They are both ardent free traders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. It's not about support/non-support, it's about her integrity and willingness to lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
12. Hillary the lying toad supports NAFTA
how can she sleep at night and if she is now using the Holocaust then she is not worthy of being the nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. it is rather shameless of her to equate the Holocaust with the jobs going overseas
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. she's often surprisingly tone deaf
it's justs a wee bit tacky.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #17
42. she is undergoing 'bunker mentality'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. It's just plain insensitive
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #45
48. Maybe members of the Democratic Party should write to Howard Dean
we as Democratic Party members should write to Howard Dean because this is getting out of hand!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
20. Is this today's manufactured outrage talking point from Obama hq?
If so, it's a really lame one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spoony Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Three threads from now, they'll be saying she's a Holocaust denier
It's astonishing how far people will stretch to trash each other at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #24
32. A couple more threads and she will have been the commandant of Auschwitz. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeff30997 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #24
51. Meanwhile in Hillary land...
Three threads from now, they'll be saying she's Mother Teresa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
23. I just heard her say "I never intended to run for public office" on Cspan
saw some threads but didn't know what they were talking about.

I now believe that she could stand up there and state in a straight face< "I am from the planet Grotoon and if you don't vote for me the planet will be incinerated".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. SHE'S SWINGING SOOO WIDE!
OBAMA ATTACK HER!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeff30997 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #23
34. But,but...
She IS from the planet Grotoon! You don't seriously think that she's human do you ? :P

And about that quote:"I never intended to run for public office".Yeah right.Somebody twisted her

arm to force her to run.Gee!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
26. If you're going to compare the loss of jobs in this country to the words of Niemoller, Hillary....
Then who would that make you and Bill, the ones who embraced NAFTA and other such trade "blitzkriegs"??

**Must resist.....urge....to...Google.....pictures..........**
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. it's a bad construct for her to use
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #26
35. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
nebula Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #26
68. The woman is unhinged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
28. Is there video of this? It sure would make for a nice commercial
She actually thinks her audience is STUPID.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
30. Hillary's detractors are merely attempting to make it sound like Niemoller, who talked about attacks

In Milton Mayer's book, They Thought They Were Free: The Germans, 1933-45 (Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1955, 1966), p. 168f quotes a German professor in "Kronenburg" (probably Frankfurt/Main) whom Mayer interviewed between 1950 and 1954, as follows:

    "Pastor Niemöller spoke for thousands and thousands of men like me when he spoke (too modestly of himself) and said that, when the Nazis attacked the Communists, he was a little uneasy, but, after all, he was not a Communist, and so he did nothing; and then they attacked the Socialists, and he was a little uneasier, but, still, he was not a Socialist, and he did nothing; and then the schools, the press, the Jews, and so on, and he was always uneasier, but still he did nothing. And then they attacked the Church, and he was a Churchman, and he did something--but then it was too late."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeff30997 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #30
47. Sure.
Everybody have heard about that interview.And if she had said:

"a date which will live in infamy—the United States of American was suddenly and deliberately

attacked by corporation forces of the Empire of Japan." She wouldn't be referring to President

Roosevelt's quote isn't it? She would be talking about the interview of Joe Schmoe about his book

on WWII.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
38. Rather classless ?
Totally fucking tasteless more like. I have no recall of such an appalling use of paraphrase. Woman needs locking up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
40. Way to go, Hillary.
Why don't you tell them they'll be obliterated next.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pisces Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
41. She has become the Enquirer of canidates. She is nothing more than a shock jock.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
43. fuck that shit--we were fucking screaming and no one listened
since the mid 70`s and i`ve watched my industry go overseas or to mexico..

we heard--- retrain! retrain for the jobs of the future..well where are those jobs? they never existed.

we have had presidents come and go and each time we lost jobs and the last straw was the trade agreement with china and nafta. her fucking husband pounded the last nail in the american workers coffin.

we cost to much for the fucking money class in this country...so buy your fucking cheap shit from china and when it breaks throw it in the trash...

we have as much worth as that cheap ass ten dollar toaster from walmart.

will this shit ever end ........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #43
49. in other countries there would have been all out strikes
the problem is apathy. In other countries for other reasons they've taken to the streets, marched and successfully overturned. The workers could have taken the whole country to a standstill but no, they don't want to be disturbed they don't want to miss the football and American Idol!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #49
53. or as in argentina we would go back and restart the factories
well i must admit the problem with that is they sold all the machines to south east asia and what they did`t want they melted down.
we can not make a nuclear plant in this country because we no longer have the machines or material to make them. it is this way across our entire industry..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #53
55. China basically owns us
how can we be in this situation owing billions to the Chinese and we basically depend on them for our goods?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
50. So who does Mrs. NAFTA think is responsible for this holocaust ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeff30997 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #50
52. The evil Japanese Empire of course. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #52
54. nah-- it was ourselves who stripped this country of the machines
and the labor to produce "things"......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #50
59. Best.Name.Evah.forHillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeff30997 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #59
64. Eva ?
Yea I'm sure that after she loses the nomination she will have her own Broadway musical and sing:

"Don't Cry for Me America".:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
57. The Nazis were an extreme version of American corporate fascism.
We see the same kind of genocidal treatment here of African-Americans who are denied equal education, health care, clean environment in which to grow (so that they start life with health problems) and the emotional problems that come from being poor in a land of affluence and who are incarcerated at insane rates. Latino immigrants who live without civil rights are also treated this way. So are women, So are Native Americans---deliberate attempts were made to destroy their cultures. So are gays. The treatment of each group varies somewhat. However the underlying motives are basically the same---consolidation of power in the hands of a few.

In Nazi Germany, the Holocaust included Jews, gays, communists, Gypsies, the physically and mentally handicapped. The purpose was not merely to "purify" the race. There was the same goal as above---the consolidation of power in the hands of a few. The Jews became a convenient scapegoat. Consider that Jewish men married to nonJewish German women were exempted at one point from being rounded up, because the German women applied so much political pressure on the government---they needed and wanted their breadwinner husbands---that it would have been politically untenable for the Nazis to take these men away----and you will see that there was a high degree of political calculation involved. It was not the "Jewishness" that was being punished. It was the otherness. People who were not part of the system were being removed so that the Nazis would have perfect control. Jews became scapegoats, just as the US has had many different scapegoats---often the poor themselves are scapegoated in this country.

Many of the worst acts of inhumanity in recent times have come as a result of capitalist greed. The money owning classes attempting to acquire all the good and wealth, persecuting vulnerable groups because fear will make the masses give up their rights and poverty makes people desperate and desperate people will work for low wages in miserable conditions.

By showing the inhumanity of a system that has rejected the needs of so many Americans, Clinton does not disrespect those who died under Hilter---or Stalin or in Rwanda. She shows that money is the root of all evil. And she draws a line between herself and her more pragmatic husband.

It is no wonder she can not raise money. The Chambers of Commerce put a $60 million bounty on Edwards head when he talked like this.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
58. When are they coming for the Jews at the steel mills?
And who are "they"? Now I'm so confused. :freak:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #58
61. I suppose she's referring to free trade deals
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #61
62. She's either much too tired to be writing her own speeches
or shes gotten into the slave trade. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cottonseed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
63. Perot said something.
And everyone laughed him out of the room without listening to a word he had to say. I don't think he should have been President, but it goes to show that even 16 years ago there was no substantial discussion of subjects (which disproportionately screw the middle class) by any of the crappy news networks whether they be in Cable or the Networks.

One thing I'd like to see during an Obama presidency is a LONG, HARD look at our press in this country. They are not the 4th estate, they are a propaganda arm of the rich and powerful.

That being said, Hillary's use of the quote in this way is insensitive and stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
65. I wouldn't have done it.
Edited on Sun Apr-27-08 10:44 PM by mmonk
Since the Clinton administration was NAFTA, should she have said we instead of they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1776Forever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
66. Boy what is next? She is such a lier - take a look at what she did to Buffalo NY! Tata is coming!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
69. oh come on. neither niemoller nor the 6 million jews own that paragraph structure
unless there's a very key component to this that you've omitted, there is no "equating" going on here.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC