On the subject of the VP

[Lyric]

I still think that the best course of action would be for one to choose the other, no matter which one wins, but if it doesn't work out that way then I think that whoever gets the nomination should consider North Carolina Governor Mike Easley. He's a popular southern governor, and choosing him practically hands us North Carolina in the general election on a silver platter. It also helps to potentially secure Virginia, as Virginia is a border state with another popular Democratic southern governor.

I know the consensus at DU is to favor Richardson, but I don't think he brings as much to the table as Easley would.

[BOSSHOG]

1. Easley endorsed Clinton today

will that make a big difference in his state?

My one appointment on my wish list is General Clark as Secretary of State. The best person for the job.

[Lyric]

2. I don't think so.

I just found out about Easley's "pansy" comment, though, so now I'm torn. Dammit.

I just think that for Obama, choosing a governor is the best possible solution to the "not enough experience" meme, and for Hillary a popular southern governor at least helps to give her a real chance at taking the state in the general.

Unfortunately, "best person for the job" isn't always the only consideration. Especially during a contentious year like this, the person most likely to either help "fix" perceived flaws in the ticket, or to bring us a state from the other side during the general, is more important than anything.