Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary picks up 4 supers from New York

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
The Ghost Donating Member (557 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 12:50 PM
Original message
Hillary picks up 4 supers from New York
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. As explained here they are both picking up expected add ons
Edited on Thu May-01-08 12:53 PM by grantcart
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x5765553


Maryland 2
5/1/2008 Selected at the State Democratic Central Committee meeting.
New York 4
5/1/2008 Selected during the State Democratic Executive Committee
Louisiana 1
5/3/2008 Selected by the Democratic State Central Committee).
South Carolina 1
5/3/2008 Elected during the State Convention
Illinois 3
5/5/2008 Selected during the State Convention


Hillary is expected to pick up 4 from NY and Obama 7 from the other three states. IL has already announced 3 for Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texas Hill Country Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. nice!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. So that puts her down only two on the day so far?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. No she is down one at 11:00 PDT
3 more Obama states with a total of 4 add ons have yet to announce
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. SORRY ONLY TWO HAVE COMMITTED FOR CLINTON
click through the link and only two have actually endorsed Clinton
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. Unity ticket? HELLO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ampad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. 4 add on SDs from NY and you think this is big news? Obama picked up 3 fm IL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lady-Damai Donating Member (756 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. OBAMA/EDWARDS TICKET! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. Unity ticket? HELL NO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olkaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
20. Keep saying it, never going to happen.
This thing is winding down, and we'll have a candidate.

This "Unity ticket" is just a distraction from the process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
24. Why would Obama shackle himself to a loser like Clinton?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. Woo hoo! Go Hill!
:woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
7. Congrats
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Ghost Donating Member (557 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
9. Of course Obama then picks up 3 from IL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeaLyons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
10. Good for Hillary!!!
Very good!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
13. Great!
I imagine the Obama Camp is wanting to keep up the appearance of a Strong Front, thinking this latest scandal will blow over..

I doubt Obama's campain will regain it's former newness and star power. Obama has run the dirtiest campaign against Hillary. A far cry from the "new" squeaky clean politics he professed would be the hallmark of his campaign. Fizzle..shnizzle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. BWHAHAHAAAAHAHAHAHA!! "Obama has run the dirtiest campaign"?!?!
Oh dear!

You probably don't realize that's an admission that you've simply forgotten the last 8 years of Republican tactics so that you can tell yourself a patent lie.

I'm just amazed how how well people can rewrite their cognitive protocols, it's always been fascinating to me. To be able to tell yourself that 'Obama has run the dirtiest campaign' shows a strong willingness to want reality to conform to your desires.

Unfortunately, here in reality, you don't have any instance you can point to which demonstrates that Obama has run a 'dirtier' campaign than anyone.

I truly hope you come back to your senses after this is all over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. I feel very badly for you..you are a pathetic loser..
who will lash out at anyone who isn't an Obama supporter..



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. No dear... I'm pointing out your lack of rationale. You may call it "lashing out",
but it's merely an observation.

You could choose to demonstrate the basis for your 'dirtiest campaign' claim, but you do not. It logically follows that you can not do so.

So instead you choose to "lash out" at anyone who points out that you are not grounded in reality.

Shame, really.

Feel as badly as you like, but realize you do so more for yourself when accusing others of 'lashing out' at you.


Why don't you choose to defend your claims?

Because you can't.

That, my dear, is what is truly sad. Good luck to you, and I hope you can become rational again one day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
14. Very nice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
16. SORRY ONLY TWO HAVE COMMITTED FOR CLINTON
This is from your link


The state Democratic Party today elected at-large delegates for Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, the allocation of which was based on a rather complicated formula dervied from the Feb. 5 primary results.

In addition, four new unpledged at-large superdelegates were elected: AG Andrew Cuomo, state Comptroller Tom DiNapoli, former Manhattan Borough President C. Virginia Fields and Assemblywoman Carmen Arroyo.

Both DiNapoli and Cuomo have endorsed Clinton. Not sure about Fields and Arroyo - will updated
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Ghost Donating Member (557 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Alright, its all good!
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. But the title of your post is incorrect and is not supported by the facts
Not your fault but Mark Halperin didn't bother to read his own source.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Ghost Donating Member (557 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. I wasnt trying to be misleading
I support Obama, but just went with the headline from Halperin. Reading the article, its still confusing! HAHA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
19. Please edit your title to read 2 supers
your original source based on your link states only 2 have endorsed Clinton so far


http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/dailypolitics/2008/05/more-ny-delegates-for-clinton.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olkaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. grantcart, I think he's making a pretty safe assumption
There's **very** little chance these guys break for Obama.

I know it's not rock-solid at this point, but it's not really a good point to argue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
my2cent Donating Member (90 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #19
27. wong, if you look at her website, she pick up all 4 SD.
our New York Automatic Delegates Back Hillary
Cuomo, Fields, DiNapoli, Arroyo named NY Automatic Delegates Today

The Clinton Campaign announced the support of four New York automatic delegates today, after the New York State Democratic Committee elected its automatic delegates to the Democratic National Convention.

The automatic delegates include New York State Attorney General Andrew Cuomo, former Manhattan Borough President C. Virginia Fields, New York State Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli and New York Assemblywoman Carmen Arroyo.

http://www.hillaryclinton.com/news/release/view/?id=7430
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. that was added at 11:32 after various reports had partial reports, including the OP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
23. Another example of the Clinton campaign screwing up a big opportunity
Obama already announces the 3 add ons for IL even though they won't be official until Monday

Clinton's campaign should have had a huge announcement. Now the press is wondering if 2 of them are even for her


I am sure that it will be all 4 for Clinton but what campaign incompetence on what should have been a big announcement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC