So now the press tells candidates when to quit? Never before have 'journalists' said this.

rodeodance

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu May-01-08 02:06 PM
Original message

So now the press tells candidates when to quit? Never before have 'journalists' said this.

Edited on Thu May-01-08 03:04 PM by rodeodance

Clinton is being held to a different standard than virtually any other candidate in history,"

http://mediamatters.org/columns/200804300001?f=h_column

Wed, Apr 30, 2008 12:40pm ET

So now the press tells candidates when to quit?

by Eric Boehlert

History continues to unfold on many levels as the protracted Democratic Party primary race marches on, featuring the first woman and the first African-American with a real shot at winning the White House.

Here's another first: the press's unique push to get a competitive White House hopeful to drop out of the race. It's unprecedented.

Looking back through modern U.S. campaigns, there's simply no media model for so many members of the press to try to drive a competitive candidate from the field while the primary season is still unfolding.

Until this election cycle, journalists simply did not consider it to be their job to tell a contender when he or she should stop campaigning. That was always dictated by how much money the campaign still had in the bank, how many votes the candidate was still getting, and what very senior members of the candidate's own party were advising.

In this case, Howard Dean, the head of the Democratic National Committee, said he was "dumbfounded" by public demands for Clinton to drop out last month. (He now wants one of the candidates to quit after the final June 3 primary.) Yet lots of pundits have suggested that in a neck-and-neck campaign in which neither candidate will likely secure the nomination based on pledged delegates, Sen. Hillary Clinton must drop out before all the states have had a chance to vote.

I realize the political debate surrounding the extended Democratic campaign remains a hot one, with people holding passionate opinions about the delegate math involved and what the consequences for the Democratic Party could be. I'm not weighing in on that debate. I'm focusing on how journalists have behaved during this campaign.

And the fact is, the media's get-out-now push is unparalleled. Strong second-place candidates such as Ronald Reagan (1976), Ted Kennedy, Gary Hart, Jesse Jackson, and Jerry Brown, all of whom campaigned through the entire primary season, and most of whom took their fights all the way to their party's nominating conventions, were never tagged by the press and told to go home.

"Clinton is being held to a different standard than virtually any other candidate in history," wrote Steven Stark in the Boston Phoenix. "When Clinton is simply doing what everyone else has always done, she's constantly attacked as an obsessed and crazed egomaniac, bent on self-aggrandizement at the expense of her party."
��
http://mediamatters.org/columns/200804300001?f=h_column

Hillary Rodham Clinton

Clinton officially declared her candidacy for president of the United States on Saturday, Jan. 20, 2007, a few months after easily winning re-election to the Senate. "I'm in. And I'm in to win," the former first lady said in a video on her Web site. Here she is campaigning in Iowa the day before the Fourth of July (Photo: AP Photo/M. Spencer Green)

Getting to Know Hillary: Clinton nabs four New York supers

� Attorney General Cuomo, Comptroller DiNapoli, former Manhattan Borough President Fields and Assemblywoman Arroyo � after state elects its add-ons.

She is also expected to get Connecticut AFL-CIO President John Olsen.

http://thepage.time.com/2008/05/01/thursdays-super-battle/

Former President Clinton can't hide his approval as his wife stumps in Concord, N.H.