|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
paulk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-01-08 03:08 PM Original message |
Why did Senator Obama support the Bush-Cheney Energy Bill? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DJ13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-01-08 03:09 PM Response to Original message |
1. Hey, now thats a new question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-01-08 03:12 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. So we aren't going to here about HC's 02 IWR vote anymore? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric Condon (761 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-01-08 04:32 PM Response to Reply #3 |
25. Yeah, because the 2002 IWR vote was no big deal, right? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-01-08 03:15 PM Response to Reply #1 |
7. can you answer it or just snark?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mahina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-01-08 03:18 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. Hi Rodeo, remember the last time we had this same conversation? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-01-08 06:28 PM Response to Reply #1 |
30. but it's never answered |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-01-08 03:11 PM Response to Original message |
2. How about from a non-Obama supporter? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-01-08 04:17 PM Response to Reply #2 |
21. of course people should change their mind when they are wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msallied (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-01-08 06:38 PM Response to Reply #21 |
33. Yes, because all of us, especially politicians, should always be 100% infallible, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-01-08 07:44 PM Response to Reply #33 |
37. but his main selling point is his superior judgement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democrattotheend (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-01-08 03:13 PM Response to Original message |
4. My understanding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democracy1st (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-01-08 03:14 PM Response to Original message |
5. Republicans always change legislation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muttocracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-01-08 03:14 PM Response to Original message |
6. do you have the bill #? I get lost unless I can look at the real thing and voting records. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-01-08 03:16 PM Response to Original message |
8. He explained it MANY times already. It had lots of money for alternative energy in it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NatBurner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-01-08 04:22 PM Response to Reply #8 |
23. what? he comprimised for the greater good? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-01-08 05:52 PM Response to Reply #23 |
29. Yes. Imagine that! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-01-08 06:31 PM Response to Reply #23 |
31. So, is this the "change" he's going to bring to Washington? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msallied (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-01-08 06:39 PM Response to Reply #31 |
34. You obviously know NOTHING about how legislation works. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-01-08 07:47 PM Response to Reply #34 |
38. since you've only been here a few weeks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-01-08 03:16 PM Response to Original message |
9. It's because he's a... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mahina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-01-08 03:17 PM Response to Original message |
10. That bill was supported by the Apollo Alliance too, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-01-08 06:34 PM Response to Reply #10 |
32. and more than half of our Democratic Senators |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yossariant (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-01-08 09:42 PM Response to Reply #32 |
43. Even McCAIN voted against it. Barack sided with Lieberman, another mentor. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yossariant (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-01-08 09:38 PM Response to Reply #10 |
42. Nuclear is renewable: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aloha Spirit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-01-08 03:19 PM Response to Original message |
12. Here you go... and why not do your own research next time/ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-01-08 04:09 PM Response to Reply #12 |
20. "nearly double the amount of ethanol used by 2012." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aloha Spirit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-01-08 04:39 PM Response to Reply #20 |
27. agreed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-01-08 05:05 PM Response to Reply #12 |
28. I generally don't consider the candidate's own websites |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marie26 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-01-08 03:20 PM Response to Original message |
13. Because he got big donations from Exelon. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-01-08 03:24 PM Response to Original message |
14. A snap shot of Obama's defense team, should he be the nominee.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-01-08 03:39 PM Response to Original message |
15. The Bush/Cheney Energy Bill Obama voted for: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSparkle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-01-08 03:53 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. So Obama voted for a bill that might have thrown some subsidies to IL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-01-08 03:56 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. Subsidies to IL is hardly the issue.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSparkle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-01-08 04:01 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. If it was so "disastrous," I wonder why Apollo Alliance supported it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-01-08 04:19 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. The Independant organization who did the analysis |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-01-08 03:57 PM Response to Original message |
18. finally this is being brought to the voters attention...thank you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-01-08 04:25 PM Response to Reply #18 |
24. You must have inadvertently missed jenmito's thoughtful explanation in Post #8 Above. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-01-08 04:36 PM Response to Original message |
26. All the tax cuts were taken out for oil companies and there was some green legislation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msallied (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-01-08 06:46 PM Response to Original message |
35. This is what happens when you have Senators running for President. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-01-08 06:47 PM Response to Original message |
36. Because Clintons spent the 90s protecting BushInc. There shouldn't BE a Bush or Cheney in WH |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-01-08 07:49 PM Response to Reply #36 |
39. the usual spam from you, I see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-01-08 07:52 PM Response to Reply #39 |
40. You asked a question and I gave you the answer that cuts through all the crap. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-01-08 09:13 PM Response to Reply #40 |
41. no, you posted the same crap you've been posting for the last |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-02-08 08:47 AM Response to Reply #41 |
44. Everything happening today IS Bill's fault for allowing BushInc to strengthen in the 90s instead |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Apr 17th 2024, 11:49 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC