|
I suppose if some people have nothing better to do than question Obama's personal decision to have stayed in the Wright church for so long they can do so, although it may just have to do with hisenjoying that congregation and all it does for the community; it gave him a connection to the community, etc. HOWEVER, the most ridiculous stats I have seen are of those who believe that Obama must somehow share many of Wright's controversial views because of his association with him and that church. To believe this, they would have to actually believe that Obama:
1) Thinks the US govt. deliberately spread AIDS. 2) Equates authorized US military action with state sponsored "terrorism". 3) Thinks god should damn his country. 4) That he is an endless victim of racism. 5) That his behavior and thought patterns are fundamentally "different" from others due to race.
And all this despite that:
1) He is half white and was raised by a white mother and to some extent white grandparents in small town white America.
2) He has achieved a level of personal and economic success most white Americans will never, ever experience.
3) He has spent a career working to bridge social divides.
4) He was the President of the Harvard Law Review, is brilliant, has taught the Constitution, and has every indication that he actually does have a mind of his own and damn good one at that.
This, frankly, does not pass the straight face test. We all have people and connections in our lives with whom we value, for whatever reason, and yet with whome we do not agree many instances. Enough of this guilt by association smear campaign ! It is ridiculous !
PS: According to this guilt by association line of logic, McCain must share every view of Falwell, Hagee, and Parsley, and Hillary must condone adultery because she stayed with Bill and must condone illegal financial acts because Norman Hsu was such a strong supporter. (?????)
|